<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OTB Reader Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:46:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: slickdpdx</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42608</link>
		<dc:creator>slickdpdx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42608</guid>
		<description>I agree with Todd Pearson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Todd Pearson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42549</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42549</guid>
		<description>I like the jump page. If I am browsing I can get the gist of the post. If I am digging, well one click and it is all there. 

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the jump page. If I am browsing I can get the gist of the post. If I am digging, well one click and it is all there. </p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42438</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42438</guid>
		<description>Mark: Mine does that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: Mine does that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark J</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42436</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42436</guid>
		<description>On my site, I use JavaScript to show the rest of the entry without having to leave the front page (e.g. &quot;show the rest here...&quot;).  I find this to be a good compromise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my site, I use JavaScript to show the rest of the entry without having to leave the front page (e.g. "show the rest here...").  I find this to be a good compromise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42397</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42397</guid>
		<description>Continued is better.  There is a good reason why newspapers don&#039;t put entire articles on the front page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continued is better.  There is a good reason why newspapers don't put entire articles on the front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42385</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42385</guid>
		<description>When I click in, I scroll down until I find the thread I&#039;m looking for (usually one I&#039;ve read and commented on) and then I use the entry-to-entry navigation at the top to read the subsequent posts.

Clicking &quot;continue&quot; won&#039;t bother me. I might like entry titles in the links up yonder, but if I haven&#039;t complained about it before, it must not bother me much anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I click in, I scroll down until I find the thread I'm looking for (usually one I've read and commented on) and then I use the entry-to-entry navigation at the top to read the subsequent posts.</p>
<p>Clicking "continue" won't bother me. I might like entry titles in the links up yonder, but if I haven't complained about it before, it must not bother me much anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sgt Fluffy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42382</link>
		<dc:creator>Sgt Fluffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42382</guid>
		<description>Keep the long posts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep the long posts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42381</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42381</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind either way, although I like for there to be enough of the piece for me to get an idea what it is about and what is going on, also I don&#039;t like it on every single post either.  Some posts are just so long that giving a good idea of what it is about in conjunction with the continued is sometimes a good option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't mind either way, although I like for there to be enough of the piece for me to get an idea what it is about and what is going on, also I don't like it on every single post either.  Some posts are just so long that giving a good idea of what it is about in conjunction with the continued is sometimes a good option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Henley</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42376</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Henley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42376</guid>
		<description>I follow OTB via RSS, so it&#039;s immaterial to me personally. But when I experimented with &quot;Continued . . . &quot; a little over a year ago, my readers on balance disapproved of the change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow OTB via RSS, so it's immaterial to me personally. But when I experimented with "Continued . . . " a little over a year ago, my readers on balance disapproved of the change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am I A Pundit Now?</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42375</link>
		<dc:creator>Am I A Pundit Now?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42375</guid>
		<description>That is, &quot;continue reading&quot; I meant. Hmm, gotta find a way to add that feature . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is, "continue reading" I meant. Hmm, gotta find a way to add that feature . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Am I A Pundit Now?</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42374</link>
		<dc:creator>Am I A Pundit Now?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42374</guid>
		<description>I find the expand comments thing to be a great thing.  If you have enough of the article at the top, I can do a quick read and see if I even want to invest the time in a full read.  Social Security? My eyes glaze over, move on. Lebanese protest babes?  Interested.  You get the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the expand comments thing to be a great thing.  If you have enough of the article at the top, I can do a quick read and see if I even want to invest the time in a full read.  Social Security? My eyes glaze over, move on. Lebanese protest babes?  Interested.  You get the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42373</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42373</guid>
		<description>I have never been a big fan of the &quot;continued&quot; bit and don&#039;t find scrolling a probelm at all.

The only time I find the &quot;continued&quot; button to be useful is when there some kind of &quot;surprise&quot; that is hidden for effect.  

I find hiding content just for length to be annoying more than anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never been a big fan of the "continued" bit and don't find scrolling a probelm at all.</p>
<p>The only time I find the "continued" button to be useful is when there some kind of "surprise" that is hidden for effect.  </p>
<p>I find hiding content just for length to be annoying more than anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_reader_survey/comment-page-1/#comment-42372</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10028#comment-42372</guid>
		<description>Clicking &quot;continued&quot; is aggravating.  And I rarely scroll by articles anyway.  Keep the long stuff going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clicking "continued" is aggravating.  And I rarely scroll by articles anyway.  Keep the long stuff going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
