<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PATRIOT CAMPAIGN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/patriot_campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/patriot_campaign/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:53:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/patriot_campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-11036</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4734#comment-11036</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In fact, the Patriot Act passed the U.S. Senate by a margin of, get this, 98 to 1 -&lt;/i&gt;

ahhh- The &#039;ol &quot;Don&#039;t vote for Bush because we are stupid&quot; line of attack.

Like Kennedy wanting to vote again on Iraq because the Dems did not know what they were voting on the first time.

Somehow &quot;vote for us we were too dumb to know what was going on&quot; is not the campaign slogan I would choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In fact, the Patriot Act passed the U.S. Senate by a margin of, get this, 98 to 1 -</i></p>
<p>ahhh- The 'ol "Don't vote for Bush because we are stupid" line of attack.</p>
<p>Like Kennedy wanting to vote again on Iraq because the Dems did not know what they were voting on the first time.</p>
<p>Somehow "vote for us we were too dumb to know what was going on" is not the campaign slogan I would choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/patriot_campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-11037</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4734#comment-11037</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Somehow &quot;vote for us we were too dumb to know what was going on&quot; is not the campaign slogan I would choose.&lt;/i&gt;

For my own party, I agree. For the other party, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Somehow "vote for us we were too dumb to know what was going on" is not the campaign slogan I would choose.</i></p>
<p>For my own party, I agree. For the other party, though...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judicious Asininity</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/patriot_campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-11038</link>
		<dc:creator>Judicious Asininity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4734#comment-11038</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Having It Both Ways&lt;/strong&gt;
James at Outside the Beltway thinks Bush was fishing for Dems in the SOTU speech last night:

John Podhoretz argues that President Bush made a brilliant, gutsy move last night by 

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Having It Both Ways</strong><br />
James at Outside the Beltway thinks Bush was fishing for Dems in the SOTU speech last night:</p>
<p>John Podhoretz argues that President Bush made a brilliant, gutsy move last night by </p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
