<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pentagon Giving Turkey Intelligence on PKK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:01:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/comment-page-1/#comment-253444</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/12/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/#comment-253444</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t think that Israel will be making the calls for bombing inside our country, so your last statement seems to be so general as to obscure the issue.  Basically, the US is still occupying Iraq and they don&#039;t have anything approaching sovereignty as we would normally recognize it.   I certainly understand the - uh - practicalities involved, but what&#039;s striking to me is that they didn&#039;t even give the &lt;em&gt;illusion&lt;/em&gt; that this was the Iraqi&#039;s decision.  Basically, it seems, this is a pretty nasty slap in the face to Iraqi sovereignty and it&#039;s just weird that they didn&#039;t even try to mitigate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don't think that Israel will be making the calls for bombing inside our country, so your last statement seems to be so general as to obscure the issue.  Basically, the US is still occupying Iraq and they don't have anything approaching sovereignty as we would normally recognize it.   I certainly understand the - uh - practicalities involved, but what's striking to me is that they didn't even give the <em>illusion</em> that this was the Iraqi's decision.  Basically, it seems, this is a pretty nasty slap in the face to Iraqi sovereignty and it's just weird that they didn't even try to mitigate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/comment-page-1/#comment-253438</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/12/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/#comment-253438</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You mean &quot;Iraq&quot; in the last sentence, right?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes - fixed!

Of course, in reality, every state&#039;s sovereignty is constrained by practicalities, certainly including ours. Some more so than others, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You mean "Iraq" in the last sentence, right?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes - fixed!</p>
<p>Of course, in reality, every state's sovereignty is constrained by practicalities, certainly including ours. Some more so than others, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/comment-page-1/#comment-253435</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/12/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/#comment-253435</guid>
		<description>You mean &quot;Iraq&quot; in the last sentence, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean "Iraq" in the last sentence, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/comment-page-1/#comment-253427</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/12/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/#comment-253427</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think the real issue is sovereignty, don&#039;t you?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s one of many issues, yes. Turkey has the right as a sovereign state to defend itself from attacks and Iraq has a duty as an ostensibly sovereign state to prevent terrorist groups from launching attacks from its territory.  Iraq&#039;s sovereignty is, of course, constrained by practical realities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think the real issue is sovereignty, don't you?</p></blockquote>
<p>It's one of many issues, yes. Turkey has the right as a sovereign state to defend itself from attacks and Iraq has a duty as an ostensibly sovereign state to prevent terrorist groups from launching attacks from its territory.  Iraq's sovereignty is, of course, constrained by practical realities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/comment-page-1/#comment-253424</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/12/pentagon_giving_turkey_intelligence_on_pkk_/#comment-253424</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;for us not to give them the best intel at our disposal so as to minimize collateral damage.&lt;/em&gt;

I think the real issue is sovereignty, don&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>for us not to give them the best intel at our disposal so as to minimize collateral damage.</em></p>
<p>I think the real issue is sovereignty, don't you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
