<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PERFIDY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perfidy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perfidy/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:58:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PB</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perfidy/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>PB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=151#comment-53</guid>
		<description>&quot;At that point, our moral obligation to defend the weak overrode our moral obligation to mind our own business.&quot;

Is this the key element to be satisfied in a &#039;humanitarian interventionist&#039; policy? And if so, does this justify us to, at any point, resume and complete our &quot;obligation[s]&quot; of the past?



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"At that point, our moral obligation to defend the weak overrode our moral obligation to mind our own business."</p>
<p>Is this the key element to be satisfied in a 'humanitarian interventionist' policy? And if so, does this justify us to, at any point, resume and complete our "obligation[s]" of the past?</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
