<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perspective?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perspective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perspective/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:16:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-17493</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6247#comment-17493</guid>
		<description>So.... the media goes stupid over a few panties on people&#039;s heads and it is Rumsfeld&#039;s fault?

Where the the media&#039;s responsibility? 

Let&#039;s look at facts. So far he have 7 people who put panties on prisoners&#039; heads. It is now approaching a month at the top of the news cycle.

The term overkill seems woefully inadequate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So.... the media goes stupid over a few panties on people's heads and it is Rumsfeld's fault?</p>
<p>Where the the media's responsibility? </p>
<p>Let's look at facts. So far he have 7 people who put panties on prisoners' heads. It is now approaching a month at the top of the news cycle.</p>
<p>The term overkill seems woefully inadequate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-17494</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6247#comment-17494</guid>
		<description>I agree with Paul. Presumably, the media is made up of adults, who have a responsibility to their professional code of conduct and to report the whole truth - not just their sensationalist, entertainment-quality version of pick and choose truth. Or lie. Or whatever.

There may be few who want to lose the war in Iraq, but there are many who want to lose &lt;i&gt;for the time being&lt;/i&gt; in order to achieve their political aims. They think there&#039;s a difference - that the latter serves a greater good.

While information dissemination is an important role of government, it is not the primary one. In a democratic society, we should be able to depend upon those whose job it is to desseminate information to behave with ethics, honesty and responsbility.

At this moment, they are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Paul. Presumably, the media is made up of adults, who have a responsibility to their professional code of conduct and to report the whole truth - not just their sensationalist, entertainment-quality version of pick and choose truth. Or lie. Or whatever.</p>
<p>There may be few who want to lose the war in Iraq, but there are many who want to lose <i>for the time being</i> in order to achieve their political aims. They think there's a difference - that the latter serves a greater good.</p>
<p>While information dissemination is an important role of government, it is not the primary one. In a democratic society, we should be able to depend upon those whose job it is to desseminate information to behave with ethics, honesty and responsbility.</p>
<p>At this moment, they are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockefeller</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-17495</link>
		<dc:creator>rockefeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6247#comment-17495</guid>
		<description>I honestly doubt that there is anyone in the mainstream press who seriously wants the U.S. to &quot;lose&quot; in Iraq.

I know some people may feel vindicated with their anti-war position if the United States doesn&#039;t achieve all their goals. But I don&#039;t think they want that to happen.

Kind of like a &quot;I told you so, Unfortunately&quot; kind of position.

I think understanding that is the key to understanding the other side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly doubt that there is anyone in the mainstream press who seriously wants the U.S. to "lose" in Iraq.</p>
<p>I know some people may feel vindicated with their anti-war position if the United States doesn't achieve all their goals. But I don't think they want that to happen.</p>
<p>Kind of like a "I told you so, Unfortunately" kind of position.</p>
<p>I think understanding that is the key to understanding the other side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-17496</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6247#comment-17496</guid>
		<description>If the coverage were even, and placed equal emphasis on the progress, and corrections for past errors in reporting, I&#039;d agree with you. 

But it isn&#039;t and they don&#039;t. Every time the media pundits have been proven wrong, or premature, the story is trampled by the goalpost movers.

These actions speak much louder than tacking on insincere disclaimers like &quot;unfortunately&quot; to sentences that start &quot;I told you so...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the coverage were even, and placed equal emphasis on the progress, and corrections for past errors in reporting, I'd agree with you. </p>
<p>But it isn't and they don't. Every time the media pundits have been proven wrong, or premature, the story is trampled by the goalpost movers.</p>
<p>These actions speak much louder than tacking on insincere disclaimers like "unfortunately" to sentences that start "I told you so..."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-17497</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6247#comment-17497</guid>
		<description>Let me display my own cynicism about the press&#039;s cynicism: What makes you think they would give &quot;all the information available&quot; any coverage?  It&#039;s not like it suits their biases, so obviously it&#039;s not news.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me display my own cynicism about the press's cynicism: What makes you think they would give "all the information available" any coverage?  It's not like it suits their biases, so obviously it's not news.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
