working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

PICK ONE

Reading various commentaries on President Bush, there seem to be two mutually exclusive opinions floating around:

  • He’s in danger of losing his base because he does not fight hard enough for conservative principles and is willing to compromise on damned near anything.
  • He’s energizing his opponents and driving away moderates in droves because he is a right wing ideologue who refuses to make even the slightest concession to achieve consensus.

    Which is it? It can’t be both, can it?

    About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

    Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
     
     
    Related Stories:
      • None Found
     
    Recent Stories:
    | Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
    • CalPundit linked with Splitting the Difference
     
    Comments
     

    Or, it's (a) for domestic policy and (b) for foreign policy. Of course, nothing drives away moderates and energizes opposition like the appear of failure and/or actual failure.

    Posted by Norbizness | September 8, 2003 | 11:26 am | Permalink
     

    He's in danger of losing his base because he does not fight hard enough for conservative principles and is willing to compromise on damned near anything.

    He's energizing his opponents and driving away moderates in droves because he is a right wing ideologue who refuses to make even the slightest concession to achieve consensus.

    It’s certainly possible that he could end up with the worst of both worlds, seen by his base as overly compromising but at the same time seen by moderates and opponents as too inflexible. Perception is everything, and it’s plausible that the same actions would be seen in an entirely different way by these factions. For a simple example, look at the situation the Palestinian P.M. finds himself in, where he’s unable to satisfy either the hardliners on his own side or the Israelis.

    Posted by Gunther | September 8, 2003 | 11:52 am | Permalink
     

    Welcome to the squeeze.

    Posted by JohnC | September 8, 2003 | 12:20 pm | Permalink
     

    does the name jimmy carter ring a bell when it comes to this conundrum?

    Posted by howard | September 8, 2003 | 01:48 pm | Permalink
     

    RSS feed for these comments.

    Comments are Closed

  •  
    Search OTB
    Lijit Logo
    OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

    For Advertising Info, write
    otb@blogads.com

    FOLLOW US

    ADVERTISERS

    OTB MEDIA

    MANzine logo

    OTB Gone Hollywood

    OTB Sports

    Allie is Wired

    ATLANTIC COUNCIL

    New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



    Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

    All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.