It’s the Jihadists, Stupid
 |
James Joyner | Friday, July 23, 2004 |
Steven Taylor discusses WaPo’s analysis of the 9/11 Commission report, “The 567-Page Story Of a Humbled America,” especially citing this passage:
It begins with a view of the enemy larger than just Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda operation. “The problem is that al Qaeda represents an ideological movement, not a finite group of people. It initiates and inspires, even if it no longer directs,” the commissioners found. “Killing or capturing [bin Laden], while extremely important, would not end terror.”
Quite right. For a more detailed examination of this point, see my TCS piece Saddam and al Qaeda and, if you’re really a glutton for punishment, my Strategic Insights article Iraq and Jihadist Terrorists: A Review Essay. Or, you can just take my word for it: It ain’t just al Qaeda.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Caption Contest Winners
- OTB Latenight – Styx
- Berlin Wall Fall: 20 Years Later
- Oklahoma High Schoolers Are Very Familiar With George Washington, Thanks
- Was Fort Hood Massacre ‘Terrorism’?
- Making Jobs More Expensive
- House Trades Freedom for Health Coverage, Senate’s Move
- Hasan a Muslim First, American Second?
- OTB Caption JamTM
- Taking “No” As Iran’s Answer
- The Key Monk linked with Commission Report Roundup
You know, so many people seem impervious to the fact that Islamic hostility towards us goes back a lot further than 9/11/01.
The real difference Al Queada has made is in the quality and intelligence of its leadership, particularly in terms of coordinating resources for attacks and of tactical acumen in carrying those attacks out.
Leadership and planning on that level is scarce. (For example, all the reports coming out now about our "intelligence failures" indicate that we don't have a whole lot of it either.) We have always had much more to fear from Osama than, say, Zaccarias Moussoui. That is WHY it is so vitally important to interdict the known and proven leaders and worry less about the dispersal of the followers.
Comments are Closed
