<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Consultant Racket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/political_consultant_racket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/political_consultant_racket/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/political_consultant_racket/comment-page-1/#comment-128219</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 02:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/political_consultant_racket/#comment-128219</guid>
		<description>But why is Yglesias so loudly going after Shrum? You don&#039;t suppose it could be that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8PA5VM80&amp;show_article=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;he exposed what a lightweight John Edwards is,&lt;/a&gt; and that Kerry regretted his choice for a running mate?

As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,275093,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hume&lt;/a&gt; pointed out a few nights ago:

&lt;blockquote&gt;    Veteran Democratic political consultant Bob Shrum is portraying John Edwards as a political lightweight who was a major disappointment to John Kerry when the two of them ran against President Bush and Vice President Cheney in 2004.

    Shrum characterizes Edwards in a new book as, “a Clinton who hadn’t read the books.” He says Kerry — “wished that he’d never picked Edwards, that he should have gone with his gut,” and selected Dick Gephardt.

    Shrum is a former campaign aide for Edwards — and their relationship soured when Shrum left the Edwards team to work for Kerry in 2003. This is not the first time he has attacked Edwards.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Look closely, James, and you&#039;ll find Yglesias doing his typical thing; Carrying Democrat Water. IN this case, John Edwards. As such, and as usual, I fail to be impressed by Yglesias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But why is Yglesias so loudly going after Shrum? You don't suppose it could be that <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8PA5VM80&amp;show_article=1" rel="nofollow">he exposed what a lightweight John Edwards is,</a> and that Kerry regretted his choice for a running mate?</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,275093,00.html" rel="nofollow">Hume</a> pointed out a few nights ago:</p>
<blockquote><p>    Veteran Democratic political consultant Bob Shrum is portraying John Edwards as a political lightweight who was a major disappointment to John Kerry when the two of them ran against President Bush and Vice President Cheney in 2004.</p>
<p>    Shrum characterizes Edwards in a new book as, “a Clinton who hadn&rsquo;t read the books.” He says Kerry — “wished that he&rsquo;d never picked Edwards, that he should have gone with his gut,” and selected Dick Gephardt.</p>
<p>    Shrum is a former campaign aide for Edwards — and their relationship soured when Shrum left the Edwards team to work for Kerry in 2003. This is not the first time he has attacked Edwards.</p></blockquote>
<p>Look closely, James, and you'll find Yglesias doing his typical thing; Carrying Democrat Water. IN this case, John Edwards. As such, and as usual, I fail to be impressed by Yglesias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
