<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guantanamo: Torture or No Torture?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:19:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51832</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51832</guid>
		<description>Being forced to wear women&#039;s underpants on one&#039;s head IS torture- just ask Ron Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being forced to wear women's underpants on one's head IS torture- just ask Ron Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51782</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 23:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51782</guid>
		<description>I was just watching the news on FOX and saw some of the lefty senators at a hearing on this subject. Kennedy made a comment, &quot;If we mistreat the GITMO prisoners, what do you think would happen if the terrorist took some prisoners&quot;

DUH     DUH    DUH   DUH 

Everyone knows that the taliban and the Iraqis treat their prisoners with understanding and care.

Kennedy and his Democrat chicken friends should become prisoners of the Taliban</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just watching the news on FOX and saw some of the lefty senators at a hearing on this subject. Kennedy made a comment, "If we mistreat the GITMO prisoners, what do you think would happen if the terrorist took some prisoners"</p>
<p>DUH     DUH    DUH   DUH </p>
<p>Everyone knows that the taliban and the Iraqis treat their prisoners with understanding and care.</p>
<p>Kennedy and his Democrat chicken friends should become prisoners of the Taliban</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51778</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51778</guid>
		<description>&quot;You have to establish legal distinctions or you canât enforce the rules you write. And if you canât enforce the rules, then for all intents and purposes there are no rules.&quot;

  Read article 133 of the UCMJ - Conduct Unbecoming of an Officer and a Gentleman.  It&#039;s so loosely defined as to be a catch-all for anything the UCMJ doesn&#039;t cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"You have to establish legal distinctions or you canât enforce the rules you write. And if you canât enforce the rules, then for all intents and purposes there are no rules."</p>
<p>  Read article 133 of the UCMJ - Conduct Unbecoming of an Officer and a Gentleman.  It's so loosely defined as to be a catch-all for anything the UCMJ doesn't cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51771</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 21:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51771</guid>
		<description>McGehee, I didn&#039;t mean there shouldn&#039;t be rules--quite the opposite.

I meant that the rules should forbid a wider range of conduct than the torture statutes do, and that the rules should forbid any conduct unbecoming of a U.S. soldier (but not in so many words--as you say, more detail&#039;s needed, but I do not have time or credibility to compose the rulebook).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McGehee, I didn't mean there shouldn't be rules--quite the opposite.</p>
<p>I meant that the rules should forbid a wider range of conduct than the torture statutes do, and that the rules should forbid any conduct unbecoming of a U.S. soldier (but not in so many words--as you say, more detail's needed, but I do not have time or credibility to compose the rulebook).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51755</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51755</guid>
		<description>McGehee,
I agree w/ you 100% that our guys are never treated as well as they should be nor as we treat POWs/EPWs, but that still is no excuse for torture. The rationale that &quot;hey they do it so we should be justified in doing it&quot; is not something that a country like ours should condone. Should we lop off some heads to show the terrorists that we mean business b/c they do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McGehee,<br />
I agree w/ you 100% that our guys are never treated as well as they should be nor as we treat POWs/EPWs, but that still is no excuse for torture. The rationale that "hey they do it so we should be justified in doing it" is not something that a country like ours should condone. Should we lop off some heads to show the terrorists that we mean business b/c they do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51751</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51751</guid>
		<description>Anderson:
&lt;blockquote&gt;While outright torture should be prosecuted, we shouldnât let legal distinctions preempt the question âwhat should American soldiers do?â&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The way you answer the question &quot;What should American soldiers do?&quot; is by writing rules. Basing those rules on &quot;I know it when I see it&quot; is bad for discipline.

You &lt;b&gt;have&lt;/b&gt; to establish legal distinctions or you can&#039;t enforce the rules you write. And if you can&#039;t enforce the rules, then for all intents and purposes there &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; no rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anderson:</p>
<blockquote><p>While outright torture should be prosecuted, we shouldnât let legal distinctions preempt the question âwhat should American soldiers do?â</p></blockquote>
<p>The way you answer the question "What should American soldiers do?" is by writing rules. Basing those rules on "I know it when I see it" is bad for discipline.</p>
<p>You <b>have</b> to establish legal distinctions or you can't enforce the rules you write. And if you can't enforce the rules, then for all intents and purposes there <b>are</b> no rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51749</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51749</guid>
		<description>Mike:
&lt;blockquote&gt;If one of our guys is captured (in this conflict or some other conflict down the road) we would not want it to happen to him.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This reciprocity argument would hold more water if our troops had &lt;b&gt;ever&lt;/b&gt; been treated as well as we treat enemy soldiers we&#039;ve captured. It&#039;s never happened. &quot;Hogan&#039;s Heroes&quot; was a TV show, not a documentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:</p>
<blockquote><p>If one of our guys is captured (in this conflict or some other conflict down the road) we would not want it to happen to him.</p></blockquote>
<p>This reciprocity argument would hold more water if our troops had <b>ever</b> been treated as well as we treat enemy soldiers we've captured. It's never happened. "Hogan's Heroes" was a TV show, not a documentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51747</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51747</guid>
		<description>Torture &quot;works&quot; so we can use it?

The ends justify the means?

I don&#039;t recall Machiavelli&#039;s being incorporated into the U.S. Constitution by any activist judges lately.

The question is &quot;does America really have any pride in itself, or is that only in country-music videos?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torture "works" so we can use it?</p>
<p>The ends justify the means?</p>
<p>I don't recall Machiavelli's being incorporated into the U.S. Constitution by any activist judges lately.</p>
<p>The question is "does America really have any pride in itself, or is that only in country-music videos?"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51741</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51741</guid>
		<description>Once you give up the high ground, you can never get it back.  If one of our guys is captured (in this conflict or some other conflict down the road) we would not want it to happen to him.

Even though these guys are technically not POWs/EPWs, torture should never be allowed - making life difficult, uncomfortable and everything short of torture is fine but we have come to far to regress back to beating out confessions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once you give up the high ground, you can never get it back.  If one of our guys is captured (in this conflict or some other conflict down the road) we would not want it to happen to him.</p>
<p>Even though these guys are technically not POWs/EPWs, torture should never be allowed - making life difficult, uncomfortable and everything short of torture is fine but we have come to far to regress back to beating out confessions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51735</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51735</guid>
		<description>Cited WaPo story, paragraph 17-18: &lt;blockquote&gt; Military commanders have said the techniques prompted Qahtani to talk.

The military achieved &quot;solid intelligence gains,&quot; by interrogating Qahtani, Craddock said yesterday, and other military officials have said he revealed details on how the terrorist network operates. &lt;/blockquote&gt; Joyner: &lt;blockquote&gt; Moreover, these tactics are counterproductive, not only because of the propaganda value they provide to our enemies but because they violate the basic tenets of effective interrogation ...&lt;/blockquote&gt; It appears we define productivity differently. It&#039;s getting a bit tiresome to keep reading the generalization that &quot;torture doesn&#039;t work&quot; (Anne Applebaum trots it out often too).

Torture sometimes works, some people have forfeited the right to avoid it by their murderous acts, and preventing further loss of life may require employing it to get them to talk. Leave the rest up to the professionals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cited WaPo story, paragraph 17-18:<br />
<blockquote> Military commanders have said the techniques prompted Qahtani to talk.</p>
<p>The military achieved "solid intelligence gains," by interrogating Qahtani, Craddock said yesterday, and other military officials have said he revealed details on how the terrorist network operates. </p></blockquote>
<p> Joyner:<br />
<blockquote> Moreover, these tactics are counterproductive, not only because of the propaganda value they provide to our enemies but because they violate the basic tenets of effective interrogation ...</p></blockquote>
<p> It appears we define productivity differently. It's getting a bit tiresome to keep reading the generalization that "torture doesn't work" (Anne Applebaum trots it out often too).</p>
<p>Torture sometimes works, some people have forfeited the right to avoid it by their murderous acts, and preventing further loss of life may require employing it to get them to talk. Leave the rest up to the professionals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51717</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51717</guid>
		<description>Good post, JJ.  (Since I haven&#039;t often said that when OTB&#039;s touched this topic, I thought it worthwhile to say it now.)

While outright torture should be prosecuted, we shouldn&#039;t let legal distinctions preempt the question &quot;what should American soldiers do?&quot;  Because that bars a lot more conduct than just torture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, JJ.  (Since I haven't often said that when OTB's touched this topic, I thought it worthwhile to say it now.)</p>
<p>While outright torture should be prosecuted, we shouldn't let legal distinctions preempt the question "what should American soldiers do?"  Because that bars a lot more conduct than just torture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51711</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51711</guid>
		<description>Maybe so, DCL -- but just try prosecuting a soldier based on that definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe so, DCL -- but just try prosecuting a soldier based on that definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/post_and_times_with_comflicting_page_1_guantanamo_stories/comment-page-1/#comment-51686</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11315#comment-51686</guid>
		<description>Is this examination of the definition of torture the kind of hair splitting of legal definitions that&#039;s not going to do us much good in the end.  I will go with Justice Stewart&#039;s definition of pornography and apply it in this case:  I know it when I see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this examination of the definition of torture the kind of hair splitting of legal definitions that's not going to do us much good in the end.  I will go with Justice Stewart's definition of pornography and apply it in this case:  I know it when I see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
