<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presidency Hillary&#8217;s to Lose?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:36:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sakthi</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127397</link>
		<dc:creator>sakthi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 15:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/#comment-127397</guid>
		<description>I would like to see Hillary on the top..I wish to see her as our next president.I&#039;m not a great believer of surveys because there are lot of possibilities to surveys become wrong.Since We don&#039;t know what is the sample size,area of sample,analysis tool,etc.,So surveys cannot be right 100%..
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.breakdown-cover.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Breakdown Insurance&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see Hillary on the top..I wish to see her as our next president.I'm not a great believer of surveys because there are lot of possibilities to surveys become wrong.Since We don't know what is the sample size,area of sample,analysis tool,etc.,So surveys cannot be right 100%..<br />
<a href="http://www.breakdown-cover.net" rel="nofollow">Breakdown Insurance</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siliconvalleypol</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127262</link>
		<dc:creator>siliconvalleypol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 01:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/#comment-127262</guid>
		<description>Hillary as President is wishful thinking. These polls do not account for the electoral structure and they use (rightfully so from mathematical perspective) a sample size that is favorable to Democrats. If you use the electoral math, you will see that Giuliani will be the next President.  He has the ability to flip a couple of big blue states but Hillary can not flip enough the other way to nullify him. Like they say - just do the math!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary as President is wishful thinking. These polls do not account for the electoral structure and they use (rightfully so from mathematical perspective) a sample size that is favorable to Democrats. If you use the electoral math, you will see that Giuliani will be the next President.  He has the ability to flip a couple of big blue states but Hillary can not flip enough the other way to nullify him. Like they say - just do the math!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127213</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 20:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/#comment-127213</guid>
		<description>I think the match up polls for all the republican candidates other than McCain and Rudy point out that 2008 is going to be a stiff head wind politically for the GOP (as things sit now). On the other hand, the democratic non-front runner tends to do better than the front runner. Let Hillary be Hillary, the GOP needs all the help it can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the match up polls for all the republican candidates other than McCain and Rudy point out that 2008 is going to be a stiff head wind politically for the GOP (as things sit now). On the other hand, the democratic non-front runner tends to do better than the front runner. Let Hillary be Hillary, the GOP needs all the help it can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Hackbarth</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127190</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Hackbarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/#comment-127190</guid>
		<description>A plus for Hillary is I don&#039;t think the public is fond of any Republicans. The war has still soured them. Combine that with a general feeling that it&#039;s the Democrats&#039; turn in the White House and I think if she survives the primaries she&#039;s the favorite to be elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A plus for Hillary is I don't think the public is fond of any Republicans. The war has still soured them. Combine that with a general feeling that it's the Democrats' turn in the White House and I think if she survives the primaries she's the favorite to be elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127188</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/#comment-127188</guid>
		<description>Well, obviously, I have no more idea who will be elected president in 2008 than anybody else does but my intuition follows Sean&#039;s:  I think that Ms. Clinton&#039;s negatives will be troublesome for her in the general election.  This makes me wonder if we&#039;re not in for an odd sort of replay of 2004 in which Democrats delude themselves on the electability of candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, obviously, I have no more idea who will be elected president in 2008 than anybody else does but my intuition follows Sean's:  I think that Ms. Clinton's negatives will be troublesome for her in the general election.  This makes me wonder if we're not in for an odd sort of replay of 2004 in which Democrats delude themselves on the electability of candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127181</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 17:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/#comment-127181</guid>
		<description>The upside to a Hillary presidency would be watching the left have to swallow their tongue or be hypocritical. Sort of like watching feminist when you talk to them about Clinton and interns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The upside to a Hillary presidency would be watching the left have to swallow their tongue or be hypocritical. Sort of like watching feminist when you talk to them about Clinton and interns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Hackbarth</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127180</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Hackbarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/#comment-127180</guid>
		<description>The Clintons as a team are the greatest politicians I&#039;ve ever seen. They fight off scandal, win elections, and get people to live and die for them (at least for Bill). 

Her high negatives make me wary of predicting Hillary would win. But I&#039;ve been psychologically preparing myself for a Hillary Presidency. I don&#039;t want to suffer from too much HDS, Hillary Derangement Syndrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Clintons as a team are the greatest politicians I've ever seen. They fight off scandal, win elections, and get people to live and die for them (at least for Bill). </p>
<p>Her high negatives make me wary of predicting Hillary would win. But I've been psychologically preparing myself for a Hillary Presidency. I don't want to suffer from too much HDS, Hillary Derangement Syndrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127172</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 17:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/presidency_hillarys_to_lose/#comment-127172</guid>
		<description>Hillary strategy seems to be based on just enough. Just enough to get the nomination. Just enough to flip one state from 2000/2004. If she wins, it is not likely to be a blow out. With her &quot;definitely won&#039;t vote for&quot; percentages running in the upper 40&#039;s, this is likely to be the best chance she has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary strategy seems to be based on just enough. Just enough to get the nomination. Just enough to flip one state from 2000/2004. If she wins, it is not likely to be a blow out. With her "definitely won't vote for" percentages running in the upper 40's, this is likely to be the best chance she has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
