Comments on: President Working on O’Connor Replacement

By: Marcia L. Neil

Marcia L. Neil — Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:43:02 +0000

Since Ms. O'Connor has been so blatantly a 'name-use' candidate and appointee, uniform standards which govern Supreme Court appointees should include standard employment rules and benefits.

By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator

Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator — Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:39:56 +0000

Roberts tells Senate panel: "I'm not an ideologue" John Roberts yesterday summed up his Senate hearings to become the nation's 17th chief justice by de

By: DL

DL — Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:19:04 +0000

Rhenquist will be replaced by Roberts-thus throwing the previous court out-of-balance toward the left. It is imperative that Bush remind the Democrats (and the public because the press will represent otherwise)that in order to restore the balance we need a strong conservative to replace the left leaning O Connor!
Failing that - remind them that Balance is another liberal lie -it is neither in the Constitution nor required by "precedent".
However, every time they open their mouths about it - demand, they pass a new Constitutional amendment requiring such.

Imbalance was approved when the voters put in Bush knowing that he might be able to appoint one or many new justices. To the victors go the spoils!