<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prognostication Scorekeeping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/prognostication_scorekeeping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/prognostication_scorekeeping/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:37:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RPK</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/prognostication_scorekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-543478</link>
		<dc:creator>RPK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29310#comment-543478</guid>
		<description>&quot;The United States will have 100,000 or more troops in Iraq at year’s end. The trend toward lower body counts will continue but civil society will remain an elusive goal.&quot; 

I would say that prediction is more than fifty percent wrong, but since the definition and criterion for civil society are undefined you can make out of your prediction what you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The United States will have 100,000 or more troops in Iraq at year&rsquo;s end. The trend toward lower body counts will continue but civil society will remain an elusive goal." </p>
<p>I would say that prediction is more than fifty percent wrong, but since the definition and criterion for civil society are undefined you can make out of your prediction what you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/prognostication_scorekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-543475</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29310#comment-543475</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re reading the IAEA too kindly.  They just say that they don&#039;t know of any not that there aren&#039;t any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you're reading the IAEA too kindly.  They just say that they don't know of any not that there aren't any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/prognostication_scorekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-543470</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29310#comment-543470</guid>
		<description>Dave,

On #8 perhaps, but the IAEA says no, and all available evidence says no.  Do you have evidence to the contrary?

On #7, he&#039;s &quot;at large&quot; until he&#039;s found, even if he&#039;s dead right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>On #8 perhaps, but the IAEA says no, and all available evidence says no.  Do you have evidence to the contrary?</p>
<p>On #7, he's "at large" until he's found, even if he's dead right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/prognostication_scorekeeping/comment-page-1/#comment-543410</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29310#comment-543410</guid>
		<description>Your eighth prediction under &#147;Predictions that came to pass&#148; is unverifiable.  I think it&#039;s true of the seventh one as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your eighth prediction under &#8220;Predictions that came to pass&#8221; is unverifiable.  I think it's true of the seventh one as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
