<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote of the Day &#8211; Drinking Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/quote_of_the_day_-_drinking_republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/quote_of_the_day_-_drinking_republicans/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:17:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: POS in the News, 3/9/09 &#124; TQIA - Turning Questions Into Answers</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/quote_of_the_day_-_drinking_republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-989149</link>
		<dc:creator>POS in the News, 3/9/09 &#124; TQIA - Turning Questions Into Answers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32888#comment-989149</guid>
		<description>[...] Outside the Beltway linked to 3 of our most recent Analysis posts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Outside the Beltway linked to 3 of our most recent Analysis posts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rdxtion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/quote_of_the_day_-_drinking_republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-989126</link>
		<dc:creator>rdxtion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32888#comment-989126</guid>
		<description>I think that graphic is a bit misleading, as all the other numbers but Obama&#039;s rely on Gallup polling.  I can&#039;t think of any reason to not include Gallup numbers for Obama unless you are trying to use low numbers.  Gallup showed Obama at 66 approval at the beginning of February and at 64 at the end of February.  I&#039;m not stating that his numbers aren&#039;t &quot;average,&quot; but I do think it&#039;s important to use the same polls if you are going to compare things like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that graphic is a bit misleading, as all the other numbers but Obama's rely on Gallup polling.  I can't think of any reason to not include Gallup numbers for Obama unless you are trying to use low numbers.  Gallup showed Obama at 66 approval at the beginning of February and at 64 at the end of February.  I'm not stating that his numbers aren't "average," but I do think it's important to use the same polls if you are going to compare things like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/quote_of_the_day_-_drinking_republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-989117</link>
		<dc:creator>PD Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32888#comment-989117</guid>
		<description>The Alex Bratty chart presents the contrarian view that the lower your initial job approval rating, the more likely you will get re-elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Alex Bratty chart presents the contrarian view that the lower your initial job approval rating, the more likely you will get re-elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
