Racism, Sexism, and Anti-Semistism
 |
James Joyner | Friday, October 5, 2007 |
Within minutes of each other (at least according to Google Reader) Megan McArdle and Ezra Klein independently published essays about the real meaning of racism and sexism and anti-Semitism, respectively.
There’s little doubt that these phenomena exist and have real impact on people’s lives. That we’re having to constantly tweak their definitions, though, would surely seem powerful evidence that they’re much less pervasive and powerful than they used to be.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- Racism, Sexism, and Anti-Semistism
- Rational Conservative Blogs
- DC Taxi Meter Politics is Local
- Arguing Past One Another
- McCain Blames Autism on Mercury
- Ezra Klein to WaPo
- Think Tanks and Groupthink
- Quote of the Day- Political Stunts Edition
- Obama: No Pacemaker For You!
- Kindle: Kinda Like A Book But More Expensive
- OTB Latenight – r.e.m.
- Krugman on the Debt and Deficits
- A Question About Bonuses and Bailouts
- Republican Purity and Conservatism
- SNL Obama China Skit
- Journalistic Ethics and Illegally Acquired Documents
- National Debt Hysteria?
- Educating Illegal Immigrants
- Caption Contest
- Nathalie Blanchard Facebook Smile Leaves Her Depressed
Racism is the belief that human beings can be divided into races and that member of some races is inferior to members of other races. Usually, this attitude also involves the belief that one's own race is superior to other races. People who believe in or practice racism are called racists. They claim that members of their own race are mentally, physically, morally, or culturally superior to those of other races. Because racists assume they are superior, they believe they deserve special rights and privileges.
Racism is a form of prejudice. Many people tend to consider their own appearance and behavior as normal and therefore desirable. They may distrust or fear people who look or act differently. When differences are obvious --such as in skin color or religious worship-- the distrust becomes greater. Such attitudes can lead to the belief that people who look or act differently are inferior. Many people do not look for the same qualities in other groups that they admire in their own. Also, they do not recognize the different but equally good qualities that member of other groups possesses.
You know racists, like those who support affirmative action to give one group priviledged status compared to another group based ont he skin color of the two groups.
Go to, let us go down, and there CONFOUND their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
Therefore is the name of it called Babel.
I'm predudice against Bear and Viking fans!
I have come cleen, now how about the rest of you.
You know racists, like those who support affirmative action to give one group priviledged status compared to another group based ont he skin color of the two groups.
Affirmative action was an effort to counter-balance racism that still existed in our society after equal rights were granted by law. You know that, so don't pretend like it was a bad idea or has a bad reason for existing. Argue it's not longer needed if you want, you might even convince me of that, but don't argue that it was always wrong.
It's (AA) always wrong because it is racist by definition and intent.
Michael,
Racist have always had a reason that seemed good to them as to why their racism was okay. And once they have the privilege, it is very hard for any group to let go of the privilege. So yes, I think it was wrong from the begining and is even worse now. Further, any time you ignore the constitution to achieve a "good", you should be careful. There is a reason that it is so hard to change the constitution so that short time whims don't resolve into long term problems.
The same impact could have been achieved by targeting socio-economic factors, rather than race. That would have also meant that as the purported good of the thumb on the scale was achieved, the people would have naturally migrated out of the protected class.
Comments are Closed
