<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ralph Reed Eyeing Georgia Governorship, White House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ralph_reed_eyeing_georgia_governorship_white_house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ralph_reed_eyeing_georgia_governorship_white_house/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:58:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ralph_reed_eyeing_georgia_governorship_white_house/comment-page-1/#comment-32247</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8866#comment-32247</guid>
		<description>We in Georgia had a strong Republican tide in &#039;02 and &#039;04, and we could conceivably see another one in &#039;06.

But tides can turn. Reed shouldn&#039;t count on his ambitions being stronger than the likelihood that the Democrats could regroup and defeat him. A last gesture of defiance, maybe -- but it would still keep him from winning his election to governor, and even as lt. governor.

Furthermore, the lt.gov.-ship has been virtually stripped of power by the state Senate&#039;s Republicans, and they&#039;re not likely to hand it all back over to a new lt.gov. just because he&#039;s GOP. State senators have ambitions of their own. And the result would be that Reed could spend his four years (if he won) standing around with nothing to do but make noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We in Georgia had a strong Republican tide in '02 and '04, and we could conceivably see another one in '06.</p>
<p>But tides can turn. Reed shouldn't count on his ambitions being stronger than the likelihood that the Democrats could regroup and defeat him. A last gesture of defiance, maybe -- but it would still keep him from winning his election to governor, and even as lt. governor.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the lt.gov.-ship has been virtually stripped of power by the state Senate's Republicans, and they're not likely to hand it all back over to a new lt.gov. just because he's GOP. State senators have ambitions of their own. And the result would be that Reed could spend his four years (if he won) standing around with nothing to do but make noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ralph_reed_eyeing_georgia_governorship_white_house/comment-page-1/#comment-32241</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8866#comment-32241</guid>
		<description>Some people might consider me a part of some &quot;moral majority,&quot; and I wouldn&#039;t trust ralph reed as far as I could throw him, certainly not enough to let him have a finger on the button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people might consider me a part of some "moral majority," and I wouldn't trust ralph reed as far as I could throw him, certainly not enough to let him have a finger on the button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ralph_reed_eyeing_georgia_governorship_white_house/comment-page-1/#comment-32229</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8866#comment-32229</guid>
		<description>You are probably correct.  And certainly if he ran today he would be considered a somewhat more serious Gary Bauer.   A successful stint in office, however could erase a lot of that.  I think he is already a lot less associated with the &quot;moral majority&quot; crowd than he was about 5 or so years ago.

Becoming Governor would help remake his image--although I still wouldn&#039;t bet on him ever sitting in the WH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are probably correct.  And certainly if he ran today he would be considered a somewhat more serious Gary Bauer.   A successful stint in office, however could erase a lot of that.  I think he is already a lot less associated with the "moral majority" crowd than he was about 5 or so years ago.</p>
<p>Becoming Governor would help remake his image--although I still wouldn't bet on him ever sitting in the WH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zed</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ralph_reed_eyeing_georgia_governorship_white_house/comment-page-1/#comment-32226</link>
		<dc:creator>Zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8866#comment-32226</guid>
		<description>James I agree, 

In modern times Christians hold as the foundation for their society a true sober faithful gov&#039;t institution, not historically inclined for the natural inferiority of the pragmatized televangelism who&#039;s figures have a tendency to be extremist and, quite frankly, say dumb things and can&#039;t seem to escape hollow forms of self-display. 

Though I think if we looked to the past to the kind of the world one is trained to want, we would see &lt;em&gt;privacy&lt;/em&gt; is the favored viture of the adroit Christain. I think we will also find the majority, the voting majority, adroit. But it the acts of individual men who set the standards, these men, for these institutions who may indeed have power, lack the attractive yoke to run. 

Though the yoke is not essential one could argue it helped Bush, with all the problems of the first term. 

Jesse Jackson attempted to reflect a yoke, but the public saw through it, too many bodygaurds to fake anyone. 

John McCain has the yoke, and has great chances.

Reagan had the yoke.

And others, might I say half of the &#039;04 running Dem.&#039;s had a little too much yoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James I agree, </p>
<p>In modern times Christians hold as the foundation for their society a true sober faithful gov't institution, not historically inclined for the natural inferiority of the pragmatized televangelism who's figures have a tendency to be extremist and, quite frankly, say dumb things and can't seem to escape hollow forms of self-display. </p>
<p>Though I think if we looked to the past to the kind of the world one is trained to want, we would see <em>privacy</em> is the favored viture of the adroit Christain. I think we will also find the majority, the voting majority, adroit. But it the acts of individual men who set the standards, these men, for these institutions who may indeed have power, lack the attractive yoke to run. </p>
<p>Though the yoke is not essential one could argue it helped Bush, with all the problems of the first term. </p>
<p>Jesse Jackson attempted to reflect a yoke, but the public saw through it, too many bodygaurds to fake anyone. </p>
<p>John McCain has the yoke, and has great chances.</p>
<p>Reagan had the yoke.</p>
<p>And others, might I say half of the '04 running Dem.'s had a little too much yoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Cents</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ralph_reed_eyeing_georgia_governorship_white_house/comment-page-1/#comment-32225</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8866#comment-32225</guid>
		<description>A December Weekly Standard piece on lobbyists and Indian gambling had a very damning accusation against Reed. It said (I&#039;m quoting from memory here--I&#039;ll post the reference if I can locate it) he offered to &quot;mobilize the Baptist preachers&quot; in Texas against reservation gambling, as part of a scheme to benefit rival gambling interests of his client(s). I remember it because it seemed (if true) so cynical and corrupt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A December Weekly Standard piece on lobbyists and Indian gambling had a very damning accusation against Reed. It said (I'm quoting from memory here--I'll post the reference if I can locate it) he offered to "mobilize the Baptist preachers" in Texas against reservation gambling, as part of a scheme to benefit rival gambling interests of his client(s). I remember it because it seemed (if true) so cynical and corrupt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
