<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ramadi Mosques Searched for Insurgents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ramadi_mosques_searched_for_insurgents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ramadi_mosques_searched_for_insurgents/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:28:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Winds of Change.NET</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ramadi_mosques_searched_for_insurgents/comment-page-1/#comment-25268</link>
		<dc:creator>Winds of Change.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7703#comment-25268</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Iraq: So Much for That Pre-Election Lull&lt;/strong&gt;
Mark Kleiman reported that major operations in Iraq were on hold until after the U.S. election. Our readers said they doubted the report. It looks like our readers were right, based on what&#039;s up in Falluja.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iraq: So Much for That Pre-Election Lull</strong><br />
Mark Kleiman reported that major operations in Iraq were on hold until after the U.S. election. Our readers said they doubted the report. It looks like our readers were right, based on what's up in Falluja.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winds of Change.NET</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ramadi_mosques_searched_for_insurgents/comment-page-1/#comment-25157</link>
		<dc:creator>Winds of Change.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7703#comment-25157</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Iraq Report: October 14/04&lt;/strong&gt;
2ID stryker in Samarra photo; Questing Cat blogs an op; rail system restoration; will muslim nations invest?; Sadrists disarm as Muqtada goes political; Japan and Jordan host donor conferences; Egypt to host electoral conference; Al Hillah SWAT team; s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iraq Report: October 14/04</strong><br />
2ID stryker in Samarra photo; Questing Cat blogs an op; rail system restoration; will muslim nations invest?; Sadrists disarm as Muqtada goes political; Japan and Jordan host donor conferences; Egypt to host electoral conference; Al Hillah SWAT team; s...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ramadi_mosques_searched_for_insurgents/comment-page-1/#comment-25128</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7703#comment-25128</guid>
		<description>A local (and admittedly left-leaning)paper yesterday carried the headline:

&quot;U.S. troops strike mosques, restaurant&quot;.  

I beilieve the story came from the AP or Washington Post...

Striking Mosques?!? Does  anybody see anything wrong with this misleading headline?  What the hell are they trying to do?  Or did Osama himself come up with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A local (and admittedly left-leaning)paper yesterday carried the headline:</p>
<p>"U.S. troops strike mosques, restaurant".  </p>
<p>I beilieve the story came from the AP or Washington Post...</p>
<p>Striking Mosques?!? Does  anybody see anything wrong with this misleading headline?  What the hell are they trying to do?  Or did Osama himself come up with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
