<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rating the Presidents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rating_the_presidents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rating_the_presidents/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:06:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rating_the_presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-362787</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/rating_the_presidents/#comment-362787</guid>
		<description>There were two presidents that would have greatly improved American history, given the chance.
 Each was under-rated by not being elected to serve four more years.
 Andrew Johnson and even more importantly Herbert Hoover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were two presidents that would have greatly improved American history, given the chance.<br />
 Each was under-rated by not being elected to serve four more years.<br />
 Andrew Johnson and even more importantly Herbert Hoover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rating_the_presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-362782</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/rating_the_presidents/#comment-362782</guid>
		<description>George Washington deserves to be high up on the list simply for resisting the pressure to become a king and for voluntarily leaving office after two terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Washington deserves to be high up on the list simply for resisting the pressure to become a king and for voluntarily leaving office after two terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rating_the_presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-362729</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/rating_the_presidents/#comment-362729</guid>
		<description>I note that my pick for most underrated president, Eisenhower, is &lt;b&gt;actually&lt;/b&gt; the #1 most underrated president on Alex&#039;s list (Carter is second).  I&#039;d pick LBJ as second most underrated although.  Many of the accomplishments commonly attributed to Kennedy are more properly assigned to Johnson.

Unfortunately, the reassessment of Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson will have to wait until the death or retirement (whichever comes first) of Baby Boomer historians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note that my pick for most underrated president, Eisenhower, is <b>actually</b> the #1 most underrated president on Alex's list (Carter is second).  I'd pick LBJ as second most underrated although.  Many of the accomplishments commonly attributed to Kennedy are more properly assigned to Johnson.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the reassessment of Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson will have to wait until the death or retirement (whichever comes first) of Baby Boomer historians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capital L</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rating_the_presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-362706</link>
		<dc:creator>capital L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/rating_the_presidents/#comment-362706</guid>
		<description>Nice to see the Napoleon of the Stump James K. Polk at 3rd on the under-rated list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see the Napoleon of the Stump James K. Polk at 3rd on the under-rated list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rating_the_presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-362679</link>
		<dc:creator>just me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/rating_the_presidents/#comment-362679</guid>
		<description>I would also say it is hard to rate a whole package.

And the reality is that this kind of system is subjective anyway.  I agree that current events influence a lot of the rankings at least with presidents from the last 30-40 years.  A little bit of space makes a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also say it is hard to rate a whole package.</p>
<p>And the reality is that this kind of system is subjective anyway.  I agree that current events influence a lot of the rankings at least with presidents from the last 30-40 years.  A little bit of space makes a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rating_the_presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-362670</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/rating_the_presidents/#comment-362670</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Reagan looks less stellar with an incredibly unpopular president of his party in office.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Reagan is always unpopular with most Democrats. HOW unpopular seems to depend on how much foam is around their muzzles at a given moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Reagan looks less stellar with an incredibly unpopular president of his party in office.</p></blockquote>
<p>Reagan is always unpopular with most Democrats. HOW unpopular seems to depend on how much foam is around their muzzles at a given moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rating_the_presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-362650</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/rating_the_presidents/#comment-362650</guid>
		<description>Fashions in these things come and go.  40 years ago I&#039;d&#039;ve said Truman was a highly underrated president.  His star has risen over the years, unrealistically in my view.  Now I think he&#039;s overrated.

Now I think that Eisenhower is a highly underrated president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fashions in these things come and go.  40 years ago I'd've said Truman was a highly underrated president.  His star has risen over the years, unrealistically in my view.  Now I think he's overrated.</p>
<p>Now I think that Eisenhower is a highly underrated president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
