<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REAGANISM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reaganism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reaganism/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:28:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reaganism/comment-page-1/#comment-5206</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3052#comment-5206</guid>
		<description>Limbaugh is getting pretty tiring on this one.  He seems to think that if you just put someone on the ballot who espouses policies similar to Reagan&#039;s, then that candidate will automatically win and the only reasons Republicans ever lose is because they mess up the message or just weren&#039;t Reagany enough.

Oddly, I don&#039;t think it works that way, but what do I know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Limbaugh is getting pretty tiring on this one.  He seems to think that if you just put someone on the ballot who espouses policies similar to Reagan's, then that candidate will automatically win and the only reasons Republicans ever lose is because they mess up the message or just weren't Reagany enough.</p>
<p>Oddly, I don't think it works that way, but what do I know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reaganism/comment-page-1/#comment-5207</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3052#comment-5207</guid>
		<description>Reagan had the slight advantage of actually &lt;i&gt;being&lt;/i&gt; Ronald Reagan; you can&#039;t really divorce the success of his campaigns from him.

And it&#039;s a fair bet that Reagan would have done well in politics no matter &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt; policies he espoused.  Actors, athletes and astronauts, and all that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reagan had the slight advantage of actually <i>being</i> Ronald Reagan; you can't really divorce the success of his campaigns from him.</p>
<p>And it's a fair bet that Reagan would have done well in politics no matter <i>what</i> policies he espoused.  Actors, athletes and astronauts, and all that...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Miss Attila</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reaganism/comment-page-1/#comment-5208</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Miss Attila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3052#comment-5208</guid>
		<description>Well, maybe a genuine conservative with Reagan&#039;s charisma would win. Where is he?

Though I think Reagan&#039;s conservative halo is starting to shine a lot in retrospect--unlike Bob Dole, he never returned money from the Log Cabin Republicans.

The fact is, in this state it&#039;s a nice plus if the candidate doesn&#039;t seem really interested in people&#039;s private lives. That means some level of social liberalism is a Good Thing.

People like to be left alone. Why is that so dastardly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe a genuine conservative with Reagan's charisma would win. Where is he?</p>
<p>Though I think Reagan's conservative halo is starting to shine a lot in retrospect--unlike Bob Dole, he never returned money from the Log Cabin Republicans.</p>
<p>The fact is, in this state it's a nice plus if the candidate doesn't seem really interested in people's private lives. That means some level of social liberalism is a Good Thing.</p>
<p>People like to be left alone. Why is that so dastardly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signifying Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reaganism/comment-page-1/#comment-5209</link>
		<dc:creator>Signifying Nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3052#comment-5209</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rush and the recall&lt;/strong&gt;
James Joyner at OTB* is getting rather tired of Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s anti-Ahnold schtick. As James points out, the state is mostly left-of-center these days (certainly...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rush and the recall</strong><br />
James Joyner at OTB* is getting rather tired of Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s anti-Ahnold schtick. As James points out, the state is mostly left-of-center these days (certainly...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
