<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reinventing Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reinventing_television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reinventing_television/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:31:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reinventing_television/comment-page-1/#comment-117255</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/reinventing_television/#comment-117255</guid>
		<description>I agree that the dominant business models may not translate well, but that doesn&#039;t mean a new one can&#039;t be found.

For example, assume you get a popular Internet TV show up and running. You are using drama and AV geeks from the local high school/college as your talent so your costs are low. You pull a reasonable audience, and more importantly you pull an interesting advertiser demographic. Now what can you make for positive and negative product placement. Cool guy gets the date while calling on his Motorola phone. Arch rival misses his opportunity when his Nokia phone&#039;s battery goes out. 

The trick is you don&#039;t have an established business model that you can bank, so you need to break the chicken/egg cycle by getting something up which catches fire, then start getting the bucks.

Another model would be good old point of view funding. Don&#039;t like abortion, how about an Internet show that will show a character deciding not to have an abortion after seeing an ultrasound. Want to promote universal health care, put in a plot line that tells the anecdotal heart render case of a family who can&#039;t get insurance. But again, probably not a lot of up front money to seed this until the audience is actually proven.

The other way is to put out a certain number of episodes and start selling subscriptions to the rest or put a 6 month time lag on the &#039;free&#039; viewing. To the extent you can really reach people, there will be a way to cash in on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the dominant business models may not translate well, but that doesn't mean a new one can't be found.</p>
<p>For example, assume you get a popular Internet TV show up and running. You are using drama and AV geeks from the local high school/college as your talent so your costs are low. You pull a reasonable audience, and more importantly you pull an interesting advertiser demographic. Now what can you make for positive and negative product placement. Cool guy gets the date while calling on his Motorola phone. Arch rival misses his opportunity when his Nokia phone's battery goes out. </p>
<p>The trick is you don't have an established business model that you can bank, so you need to break the chicken/egg cycle by getting something up which catches fire, then start getting the bucks.</p>
<p>Another model would be good old point of view funding. Don't like abortion, how about an Internet show that will show a character deciding not to have an abortion after seeing an ultrasound. Want to promote universal health care, put in a plot line that tells the anecdotal heart render case of a family who can't get insurance. But again, probably not a lot of up front money to seed this until the audience is actually proven.</p>
<p>The other way is to put out a certain number of episodes and start selling subscriptions to the rest or put a 6 month time lag on the 'free' viewing. To the extent you can really reach people, there will be a way to cash in on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Popular Culture and Gresham&#8217;s Law</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reinventing_television/comment-page-1/#comment-117253</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Popular Culture and Gresham&#8217;s Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/reinventing_television/#comment-117253</guid>
		<description>[...] Have you ever wondered why so much popular music, movies, television, books and so on are so terrible? I began thinking about it as I read James Joyner&#8217;s post on media convergence and the reinvention of television. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Have you ever wondered why so much popular music, movies, television, books and so on are so terrible? I began thinking about it as I read James Joyner&#8217;s post on media convergence and the reinvention of television. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/reinventing_television/comment-page-1/#comment-117247</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/03/reinventing_television/#comment-117247</guid>
		<description>Where is Howard Beale when you need him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is Howard Beale when you need him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
