<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Repeal McCain-Feingold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:40:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/comment-page-1/#comment-96264</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 08:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/09/repeal_mccain-feingold_/#comment-96264</guid>
		<description>Aaaaa-men.

I even swayed and clapped my hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaaa-men.</p>
<p>I even swayed and clapped my hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/comment-page-1/#comment-96230</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 20:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/09/repeal_mccain-feingold_/#comment-96230</guid>
		<description>Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/comment-page-1/#comment-96203</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/09/repeal_mccain-feingold_/#comment-96203</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Can I get an Amen?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, but not within 60 days of the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Can I get an Amen?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, but not within 60 days of the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent G. Budge</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/comment-page-1/#comment-96194</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent G. Budge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 16:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/09/repeal_mccain-feingold_/#comment-96194</guid>
		<description>Amen here.

&lt;em&gt;This law may end up damaging McCain’s Presidential ambitions.&lt;/em&gt;

Amen to that too.

I have only one caveat on the transparency approach:  I wonder how such a requirement would have played out during the Constitutional ratification debate?  Might have cramped Publius&#039; style ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen here.</p>
<p><em>This law may end up damaging McCain&rsquo;s Presidential ambitions.</em></p>
<p>Amen to that too.</p>
<p>I have only one caveat on the transparency approach:  I wonder how such a requirement would have played out during the Constitutional ratification debate?  Might have cramped Publius' style ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/comment-page-1/#comment-96177</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/09/repeal_mccain-feingold_/#comment-96177</guid>
		<description>McCain-Feingold has also has some unintended consequences that work against the incumbent. I&#039;m thinking of the &quot;Millionaires&#039; amendment,&quot; that apparently allows a well-off challenger to loan his/her campaign money (before the primary), but denies that to incumbents. This is played out a &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2003233883_webfeccantwell29.html?syndication=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;couple of days ago&lt;/a&gt; in the WA State Senate campaign this year (ironic as the incumbent likewise loaned money to her 2000 campaign, though before the restrictions went into effect).

This law may end up damaging McCain&#039;s Presidential ambitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain-Feingold has also has some unintended consequences that work against the incumbent. I'm thinking of the "Millionaires' amendment," that apparently allows a well-off challenger to loan his/her campaign money (before the primary), but denies that to incumbents. This is played out a <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2003233883_webfeccantwell29.html?syndication=rss" rel="nofollow">couple of days ago</a> in the WA State Senate campaign this year (ironic as the incumbent likewise loaned money to her 2000 campaign, though before the restrictions went into effect).</p>
<p>This law may end up damaging McCain's Presidential ambitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/comment-page-1/#comment-96169</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/09/repeal_mccain-feingold_/#comment-96169</guid>
		<description>The truth is in the eyes of the beerholder...

I heard an ad today on the radio about a candidate that voted against tough child pornography legislation, and what kind of person would support child molestation, etc.

It was very tasteless, and left me questioning what was the substance of the bill that was voted down.  i.e. the candidate may not have voted against safegurading our children, rather the approach that the particular bill took.

The ad backfired. It made me want to vote for the other guy just because it was so tasteless, and likley untrue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth is in the eyes of the beerholder...</p>
<p>I heard an ad today on the radio about a candidate that voted against tough child pornography legislation, and what kind of person would support child molestation, etc.</p>
<p>It was very tasteless, and left me questioning what was the substance of the bill that was voted down.  i.e. the candidate may not have voted against safegurading our children, rather the approach that the particular bill took.</p>
<p>The ad backfired. It made me want to vote for the other guy just because it was so tasteless, and likley untrue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/comment-page-1/#comment-96165</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/09/repeal_mccain-feingold_/#comment-96165</guid>
		<description>matt:  No.  You can&#039;t mention a candidate&#039;s name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matt:  No.  You can't mention a candidate's name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/comment-page-1/#comment-96164</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/09/repeal_mccain-feingold_/#comment-96164</guid>
		<description>I second that amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmatt</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/repeal_mccain-feingold_/comment-page-1/#comment-96163</link>
		<dc:creator>madmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/09/repeal_mccain-feingold_/#comment-96163</guid>
		<description>well is the truth an attack had, can you still hold up a sitting senators vote and say he voted for this and against that etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well is the truth an attack had, can you still hold up a sitting senators vote and say he voted for this and against that etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
