<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans a Damaged Brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:20:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: An Interested Party</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109702</link>
		<dc:creator>An Interested Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 04:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109702</guid>
		<description>Who knew Mitch McConnell has a &quot;fresh&quot; face?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knew Mitch McConnell has a "fresh" face?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right on the Right &#187; A Damaged Brand?</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109701</link>
		<dc:creator>Right on the Right &#187; A Damaged Brand?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 04:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109701</guid>
		<description>[...] Outside The Beltway has some commentary on excerpts from a Charlie Cook column speculating that the Republican Party is now a damaged brand. They expand upon that idea, and mention that people want true Conservatism, like fiscal responsibility. Go read it. I have to agree. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Outside The Beltway has some commentary on excerpts from a Charlie Cook column speculating that the Republican Party is now a damaged brand. They expand upon that idea, and mention that people want true Conservatism, like fiscal responsibility. Go read it. I have to agree. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109696</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109696</guid>
		<description>Floyd, 

I believe that the Democrats benefit in that they seem to be able to function as a political party while having factions with opposites beliefs. 

I believe that blacks are willing to put up with any hostility by the Democratic Party toward religion because no Democratic candidate is ever hostile toward the religious practices of the black community. It has always seemed to me that the Democrats operate from the view that whites should be smart enough not to &quot;fall for religion&quot; but it is quaint when blacks practice their brand of religion because, in the view of many Democrats, they are too stupid to &quot;not fall for religion.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floyd, </p>
<p>I believe that the Democrats benefit in that they seem to be able to function as a political party while having factions with opposites beliefs. </p>
<p>I believe that blacks are willing to put up with any hostility by the Democratic Party toward religion because no Democratic candidate is ever hostile toward the religious practices of the black community. It has always seemed to me that the Democrats operate from the view that whites should be smart enough not to "fall for religion" but it is quaint when blacks practice their brand of religion because, in the view of many Democrats, they are too stupid to "not fall for religion."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109683</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109683</guid>
		<description>superdestroyer;thank you for at least making a reasonable argument. Half the people in this country seem to agree with your position. Maybe they are right! I see  a flaw in the democrat party. That is taking blacks and hispanics for granted  while IMHO showing hostility toward their religion and pandering to the extremists on the left who would drag the country toward MARXISM.
 Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>superdestroyer;thank you for at least making a reasonable argument. Half the people in this country seem to agree with your position. Maybe they are right! I see  a flaw in the democrat party. That is taking blacks and hispanics for granted  while IMHO showing hostility toward their religion and pandering to the extremists on the left who would drag the country toward MARXISM.<br />
 Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109682</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109682</guid>
		<description>anjin-sin ; See what I mean?!**You&#039;re a registered Democrat and the minute you get in power you start telling me what to smoke.[lol]**
 The democrats are the ones spitting on hard fought liberties, and the people who made them. Your feeble ad hominem notwthstanding.
  **Or to put in the vernacular NAH,NAH...NA.. NAH,NAH**

**    ** Indicates sarcasm for those who can&#039;t tell![grinz]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anjin-sin ; See what I mean?!**You're a registered Democrat and the minute you get in power you start telling me what to smoke.[lol]**<br />
 The democrats are the ones spitting on hard fought liberties, and the people who made them. Your feeble ad hominem notwthstanding.<br />
  **Or to put in the vernacular NAH,NAH...NA.. NAH,NAH**</p>
<p>**    ** Indicates sarcasm for those who can't tell![grinz]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superdestroyer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109655</link>
		<dc:creator>superdestroyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109655</guid>
		<description>Floyd, 

You may want to look up religious participation rates for different demographic groups.  Blacks in America are by far the most religious people in the United States and vote Democratic 90% of the time.  

I think people forget that politics is not a sporting event.  The Republicans are not going to get an easier schedule or the number one draft pick.  They are at a disadvantage versus the Democrats and the disadvantages will grow. 

If anyone had a good method of getting more Hispanics and blacks to vote Republican, the Republican National Party would be willing to pay them millions of dollars.  Yet, no one has any good ideas of getting more votes from those groups without alienating core Republican voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floyd, </p>
<p>You may want to look up religious participation rates for different demographic groups.  Blacks in America are by far the most religious people in the United States and vote Democratic 90% of the time.  </p>
<p>I think people forget that politics is not a sporting event.  The Republicans are not going to get an easier schedule or the number one draft pick.  They are at a disadvantage versus the Democrats and the disadvantages will grow. </p>
<p>If anyone had a good method of getting more Hispanics and blacks to vote Republican, the Republican National Party would be willing to pay them millions of dollars.  Yet, no one has any good ideas of getting more votes from those groups without alienating core Republican voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109652</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109652</guid>
		<description>Floyd,

Whatever you are smoking, you should give it up. I am a registered Democrat an hold religious freedom as one of the cornerstones of the American way of life. Millions of other Democrats feel exactly the same way. Many have fought and many died for this ideal. Why are you spitting on their sacrifice for freedom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floyd,</p>
<p>Whatever you are smoking, you should give it up. I am a registered Democrat an hold religious freedom as one of the cornerstones of the American way of life. Millions of other Democrats feel exactly the same way. Many have fought and many died for this ideal. Why are you spitting on their sacrifice for freedom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109645</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109645</guid>
		<description>&quot;...are cracks in the wall of our strong national security fortress...&quot;

I do so love understatement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"...are cracks in the wall of our strong national security fortress..."</p>
<p>I do so love understatement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109640</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109640</guid>
		<description>anjin sin; I didn&#039;t say they did. I&#039;m no republican either, but everyday under democrat control is a threat religious liberty in this country.Just ask any democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anjin sin; I didn't say they did. I'm no republican either, but everyday under democrat control is a threat religious liberty in this country.Just ask any democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109636</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109636</guid>
		<description>Right Floyd, only the GOP embraces Christian values, just ask Bush&#039;s pal Ted Haggard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right Floyd, only the GOP embraces Christian values, just ask Bush's pal Ted Haggard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109634</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109634</guid>
		<description>Lily,

Poll the patriot acts and you get overwhelming success. Want to know why the foreign intercepts and SWIFT fell off the democratic speaking points? Because the public wants them in overwhelming numbers. Note that their repeal isn&#039;t on Pelosi&#039;s 100 days for the same reason.

What imprisonment without trial? Captured enemy not being given a trial? That&#039;s been going on since the founding of the country.

As far as the noise machine, which side had a major political figure have to give up the microphone to a chanting diva. Sorry, the left has the noise and thunder (signifying nothing, but they have it). 

Pandering is always a perspective. Shall we see what is under the tree for the big unions. Perhaps they will get union elections without a secret ballot. Nothing like squashing the mechanisms of democracy (secret voting, free speech, etc) to show you are a democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lily,</p>
<p>Poll the patriot acts and you get overwhelming success. Want to know why the foreign intercepts and SWIFT fell off the democratic speaking points? Because the public wants them in overwhelming numbers. Note that their repeal isn't on Pelosi's 100 days for the same reason.</p>
<p>What imprisonment without trial? Captured enemy not being given a trial? That's been going on since the founding of the country.</p>
<p>As far as the noise machine, which side had a major political figure have to give up the microphone to a chanting diva. Sorry, the left has the noise and thunder (signifying nothing, but they have it). </p>
<p>Pandering is always a perspective. Shall we see what is under the tree for the big unions. Perhaps they will get union elections without a secret ballot. Nothing like squashing the mechanisms of democracy (secret voting, free speech, etc) to show you are a democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109633</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109633</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;You are forgetting the coming demographic tidal wave that will probably bury the Republicans.&quot;&quot;

superdestroyer; Not so fast, consider that the VAST majority of the demographic shift comes from a population that is nearly all Catholic and the Democrats HATE christian values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>""You are forgetting the coming demographic tidal wave that will probably bury the Republicans.""</p>
<p>superdestroyer; Not so fast, consider that the VAST majority of the demographic shift comes from a population that is nearly all Catholic and the Democrats HATE christian values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109624</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109624</guid>
		<description>Those of us in the middle would prefer members of both parties started spending more time thinking about the people they represent and less time worrying whether they are &quot;winning&quot; or &quot;ascendant.&quot;

Not that I expect &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; to happen any time soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of us in the middle would prefer members of both parties started spending more time thinking about the people they represent and less time worrying whether they are "winning" or "ascendant."</p>
<p>Not that I expect <em>that</em> to happen any time soon...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lily</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109623</link>
		<dc:creator>lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109623</guid>
		<description>Does a return to limited government mean Republicans are going to renounce their adoption of authoritarianism?   By adoption of authoritarianism I mean big hunks of the Patriot Act, the imprisonments without trial, the use of the Noise Machine for bullying and intimidation  (the recent attacks on the Gitmo lawyers and the faux outrage over Boxer&#039;s remarks, for example) and the pandering to radical righwing &quot;Christians&quot; and their legislative agenda. 
  Giving up big government is a dangerous more for Republicans since their authoritarian base loves big government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does a return to limited government mean Republicans are going to renounce their adoption of authoritarianism?   By adoption of authoritarianism I mean big hunks of the Patriot Act, the imprisonments without trial, the use of the Noise Machine for bullying and intimidation  (the recent attacks on the Gitmo lawyers and the faux outrage over Boxer's remarks, for example) and the pandering to radical righwing "Christians" and their legislative agenda.<br />
  Giving up big government is a dangerous more for Republicans since their authoritarian base loves big government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Are The Republicans Damaged Goods ?</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_a_damaged_brand/comment-page-1/#comment-109606</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Papers&#187;Blog Archive &#187; Are The Republicans Damaged Goods ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/republicans_a_damaged_brand/#comment-109606</guid>
		<description>[...] James Joyner writes about an upcoming column by Charlie Cook in the National Journal where he says this: &#8220;Republican campaign consultants have been publicly expressing a great deal of concern that the &#8216;GOP brand&#8217; has been damaged, or at least tarnished. For top strategists to be so candid about their party’s problems is fairly unusual, and it reflects just how urgent they consider the party’s need to redefine itself as it prepares for the 2008 campaign.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Joyner writes about an upcoming column by Charlie Cook in the National Journal where he says this: &#8220;Republican campaign consultants have been publicly expressing a great deal of concern that the &#8216;GOP brand&#8217; has been damaged, or at least tarnished. For top strategists to be so candid about their party&rsquo;s problems is fairly unusual, and it reflects just how urgent they consider the party&rsquo;s need to redefine itself as it prepares for the 2008 campaign.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
