<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans Call for Dumping Cheney for Rice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:20:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/comment-page-1/#comment-80052</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/04/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/#comment-80052</guid>
		<description>A number of pundits have reflected that Bush can&#039;t (politically) fire Rumsfeld, since it would invalidate everything he&#039;s tried to achieve in Iraq - it would be seen as an admission (right or wrong) that the &#039;leftys&#039; we correct all along.

I&#039;m still not certain, but I have a feeling they may be right. If so, how big an admission of failure would it be to dump Cheney? While Rice would be an intriguing choice if Cheney gets too... legally entangled to continue in office, she&#039;d have to be stone-cold nuts to accept. Remember the bin Laden PDB? Imagine that all over again, in a potentially Dem-controlled Congressional confirmation hearing.

That should be enought to put the Fear of God into any Repblican...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of pundits have reflected that Bush can't (politically) fire Rumsfeld, since it would invalidate everything he's tried to achieve in Iraq - it would be seen as an admission (right or wrong) that the 'leftys' we correct all along.</p>
<p>I'm still not certain, but I have a feeling they may be right. If so, how big an admission of failure would it be to dump Cheney? While Rice would be an intriguing choice if Cheney gets too... legally entangled to continue in office, she'd have to be stone-cold nuts to accept. Remember the bin Laden PDB? Imagine that all over again, in a potentially Dem-controlled Congressional confirmation hearing.</p>
<p>That should be enought to put the Fear of God into any Repblican...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bhoe</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/comment-page-1/#comment-79922</link>
		<dc:creator>Bhoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/04/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/#comment-79922</guid>
		<description>How in the world does the Sunday Times consider Condi Rice a &quot;new face&quot;?  She has been at the nerve center of the Bush camp since even before he was elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in the world does the Sunday Times consider Condi Rice a "new face"?  She has been at the nerve center of the Bush camp since even before he was elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan, California Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/comment-page-1/#comment-79916</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan, California Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/04/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/#comment-79916</guid>
		<description>I just can&#039;t see President Bush dumping Cheney. And I can&#039;t imagine how dumping him could be spun in a manner that would provide the president a political advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can't see President Bush dumping Cheney. And I can't imagine how dumping him could be spun in a manner that would provide the president a political advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Abraham - Because the Medium is the Message</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/comment-page-1/#comment-129541</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Abraham - Because the Medium is the Message</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/04/republicans_call_for_dumping_cheney_for_rice/#comment-129541</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;&quot;Republicans are urging President George W Bush to dump Dick Cheney as vice-president and replace him with Condoleezza Rice if he is serious about presenting a new face to the jaded American public.&quot; Via memeorandum and the Times of London andOutside the Beltway&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->"Republicans are urging President George W Bush to dump Dick Cheney as vice-president and replace him with Condoleezza Rice if he is serious about presenting a new face to the jaded American public." Via memeorandum and the Times of London andOutside the Beltway<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
