Comments on: Republicans Have Huge Money Lead In Close House Races

By: anjin-san

anjin-san — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:58:59 +0000

Steven,

Your argument assumes some sort of financial parity going in, which is not the case. The GOP had deeper pockets from the get-go. Corporations who have been given the green light to do basically anything they please did not stiff their benefactors...

By: Steven Plunk

Steven Plunk — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:39:35 +0000

Buying the election in the classic sense would be to purchase individual votes.

Getting your message out to convince people to vote for you is legitimate. If the Dems spent too early and now will be drowned out by GOP ads that is poor campaigning, nothing more.

By: Blue Crab Boulevard » Blog Archive » Cash On Hand

Blue Crab Boulevard » Blog Archive » Cash On Hand — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:28:01 +0000

[...] UPDATE: Others: OTB, RWN, TMV, AJ Strata, [...]

By: anjin-san

anjin-san — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:01:38 +0000

So the good news is the GOP might still be able to buy the election?

By: RatMan

RatMan — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:28:59 +0000

Spam comment in violation of site policies deleted.

By: Wake up America

Wake up America — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:18:15 +0000

MONEY, MONEY AND MORE MONEY...

The Democrats have NO NEW STRATEGY, when they are forced to state an idea, it is always an old one, inevitably, one that has failed in the past. They have NO NEW IDEAS....

By: Lawyers, Guns and Money

Lawyers, Guns and Money — Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000

likely outcome. And in the Senate, every pickup matters a lot if even if you don't win, especially for threatening filibusters. The reverse-hedge point is true too, of course, but I still say Mets in 6 with Glavine now starting on full rest... ...James Joyner says that "neither side has any real reason to be confident at this point." Seems about right.