<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans Lose House, Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:28:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-104660</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-104660</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Republicans Uphill Fight To Regain The Senate In 2008 By James Joyner...&lt;/strong&gt;

In my morning-after election analysis, I noted that it would be very difficult for the Republicans to take the House......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Republicans Uphill Fight To Regain The Senate In 2008 By James Joyner...</strong></p>
<p>In my morning-after election analysis, I noted that it would be very difficult for the Republicans to take the House......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Florida Masochist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The carnage may not be over</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103840</link>
		<dc:creator>The Florida Masochist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The carnage may not be over</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103840</guid>
		<description>[...] So this race can&#8217;t be put to bed yet. I agree with much of James Joyner&#8217;s conclusions at OTB. These four in particular. - Several House races lost through individual scandals involving Delay, Foley, Weldon, Ney, Sherwood, and others are low hanging fruit that should be easy to recapture in ‘08. Still, it will take either an incredibly popular presidential nominee or Hastertesque ineptitude on the part of Pelosi and company for the GOP to retake the House two years hence. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So this race can&#8217;t be put to bed yet. I agree with much of James Joyner&#8217;s conclusions at OTB. These four in particular. - Several House races lost through individual scandals involving Delay, Foley, Weldon, Ney, Sherwood, and others are low hanging fruit that should be easy to recapture in ‘08. Still, it will take either an incredibly popular presidential nominee or Hastertesque ineptitude on the part of Pelosi and company for the GOP to retake the House two years hence. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103481</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103481</guid>
		<description>Bit,

If Hegel runs for President, I will support him. Good man, decorated combat vet, hard worker, actually reads bills before he signs them. I am on record many times saying Reagan was a great president I was proud to vote for. 

I have been highly critical of John Kerry and numerous other Democrats, if you think I feel they can do no wrong, you are not reading carefully enough. I just think that Democrats suck less than the disgrace the GOP has become under Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit,</p>
<p>If Hegel runs for President, I will support him. Good man, decorated combat vet, hard worker, actually reads bills before he signs them. I am on record many times saying Reagan was a great president I was proud to vote for. </p>
<p>I have been highly critical of John Kerry and numerous other Democrats, if you think I feel they can do no wrong, you are not reading carefully enough. I just think that Democrats suck less than the disgrace the GOP has become under Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103461</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103461</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hopefully rational people in both parties can seize this opportunity to abandon party dogma&lt;/blockquote&gt;

so, just how far does your bipartisanship extend?  So far all I&#039;ve seen out of you is criticism for the republicans. Meanwhile the democrats can do no wrong?  PPPPpppppppppppppth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hopefully rational people in both parties can seize this opportunity to abandon party dogma</p></blockquote>
<p>so, just how far does your bipartisanship extend?  So far all I've seen out of you is criticism for the republicans. Meanwhile the democrats can do no wrong?  PPPPpppppppppppppth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103373</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 01:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103373</guid>
		<description>superdestroyer; I think you describe the democrats very well. allow me to say rephrase     succinctly....they are CONFUSED !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>superdestroyer; I think you describe the democrats very well. allow me to say rephrase     succinctly....they are CONFUSED !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103370</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 01:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103370</guid>
		<description>Pug,

Cheney &amp; Rush have told Bit to be terrified of &quot;the far left&quot; and he is doing what he has been told to do.

Hopefully rational people in both parties can seize this opportunity to abandon party dogma, and begin to work to solve our country&#039;s problems. Its what the founding fathers intended.

Divided government worked very well in this country just a few short years ago.  I am saddened to see that some people in this country actually seem to despise the democratic process, but I think it just might work in spite of them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pug,</p>
<p>Cheney &amp; Rush have told Bit to be terrified of "the far left" and he is doing what he has been told to do.</p>
<p>Hopefully rational people in both parties can seize this opportunity to abandon party dogma, and begin to work to solve our country's problems. Its what the founding fathers intended.</p>
<p>Divided government worked very well in this country just a few short years ago.  I am saddened to see that some people in this country actually seem to despise the democratic process, but I think it just might work in spite of them...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103367</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103367</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve certainly heard no Democrats calling for a “far left agenda”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps some reading of the words of John Conyers , Dirty DIngle and Harry Reid would be helpful to that end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I&rsquo;ve certainly heard no Democrats calling for a “far left agenda”.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps some reading of the words of John Conyers , Dirty DIngle and Harry Reid would be helpful to that end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103366</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103366</guid>
		<description>james ; I was despondent until I read your last sentence, now I&#039;m TERRIFIED!!we are going to need at least a couple more Scalias if we hope to save the world&#039;s last best hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>james ; I was despondent until I read your last sentence, now I'm TERRIFIED!!we are going to need at least a couple more Scalias if we hope to save the world's last best hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103360</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103360</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Bowers, and the rest of the far left had best heed that point&lt;/em&gt;

Bithead, perhaps you shouldn&#039;t be issuing warnings today about what the Democrats should heed.  The Republicans got clocked last night, not the Democrats.  I&#039;ve certainly heard no Democrats calling for a &quot;far left agenda&quot;.

Maybe today is a day for the &quot;far right&quot; to be doing a little soul searching, not the &quot;far left&quot;.  Maybe next time the Republicans can try to come up with something a little better than the &quot;John Kerry hates the troops&quot; strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Bowers, and the rest of the far left had best heed that point</em></p>
<p>Bithead, perhaps you shouldn't be issuing warnings today about what the Democrats should heed.  The Republicans got clocked last night, not the Democrats.  I've certainly heard no Democrats calling for a "far left agenda".</p>
<p>Maybe today is a day for the "far right" to be doing a little soul searching, not the "far left".  Maybe next time the Republicans can try to come up with something a little better than the "John Kerry hates the troops" strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103349</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103349</guid>
		<description>The problem with your analysis is that you&#039;re not taking into consideration the people that those democrats replaced. the republicans who ended up getting replace in the races that Mr. Bowers mentions, were to one man to the left of the republican party.  From there, it&#039;s not much of a leap to center line democrat.  

Now, had Rhode Island for example go on from Lincoln Chaffee directly to the reincarnation of Kucinich, Bowers might actually have a point.... but in no case did that kind of shift happen. 

Bowers, and the rest of the far left had best heed that point, and the measurement of the refferendums in the various districts. As Michelle points up today:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Property rights initiatives limiting eminent domain won big. MCRI, the anti-racial preference measure, passed resoundingly. Congressman Tom Tancredo, the GOP&#039;s leading warrior against illegal immigration--opposed by both the open-borders Left and the open-borders White House--won a fifth term handily. Gay marriage bans won approval in 3 states. And as of this writing, the oil tax initiative, Prop. 87--backed by deep-pocketed Hollywood libs, is trailing badly in California.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Those kinds of voting patterns are hardly to be consdiered Mainline Democrat, and certainly not the kind of Democrat voter Bowers would approve of.

Tie this with the idea that the approval ratings of the Democrats have been polling lower than the Republicans in the last couple years, even up to and including this last week, and clearly, there&#039;s a danger for the Democrats in taking this vote to mean even a partial approval for their far leftist agenda. The data coming in from last nights voting suggests that it&#039;s an approval the Democarts simply don&#039;t have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with your analysis is that you're not taking into consideration the people that those democrats replaced. the republicans who ended up getting replace in the races that Mr. Bowers mentions, were to one man to the left of the republican party.  From there, it's not much of a leap to center line democrat.  </p>
<p>Now, had Rhode Island for example go on from Lincoln Chaffee directly to the reincarnation of Kucinich, Bowers might actually have a point.... but in no case did that kind of shift happen. </p>
<p>Bowers, and the rest of the far left had best heed that point, and the measurement of the refferendums in the various districts. As Michelle points up today:</p>
<blockquote><p>Property rights initiatives limiting eminent domain won big. MCRI, the anti-racial preference measure, passed resoundingly. Congressman Tom Tancredo, the GOP's leading warrior against illegal immigration--opposed by both the open-borders Left and the open-borders White House--won a fifth term handily. Gay marriage bans won approval in 3 states. And as of this writing, the oil tax initiative, Prop. 87--backed by deep-pocketed Hollywood libs, is trailing badly in California.</p></blockquote>
<p>Those kinds of voting patterns are hardly to be consdiered Mainline Democrat, and certainly not the kind of Democrat voter Bowers would approve of.</p>
<p>Tie this with the idea that the approval ratings of the Democrats have been polling lower than the Republicans in the last couple years, even up to and including this last week, and clearly, there's a danger for the Democrats in taking this vote to mean even a partial approval for their far leftist agenda. The data coming in from last nights voting suggests that it's an approval the Democarts simply don't have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anjin-San</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103322</link>
		<dc:creator>Anjin-San</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103322</guid>
		<description>Hopefully, the result of this will be a move to the center by both parties, and a realization that both parties can offer candidates the opposition can respect, such as Jim Webb.

I hope the GOP moves towards returning to being the party I was proud to belong to under Ronald Reagan. Chuck Hegel strikes me as the man who might take it there.

My message to Nancy Pelosi is don&#039;t let it go to your head. The American people are looking for some humility from their leaders right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully, the result of this will be a move to the center by both parties, and a realization that both parties can offer candidates the opposition can respect, such as Jim Webb.</p>
<p>I hope the GOP moves towards returning to being the party I was proud to belong to under Ronald Reagan. Chuck Hegel strikes me as the man who might take it there.</p>
<p>My message to Nancy Pelosi is don't let it go to your head. The American people are looking for some humility from their leaders right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bandit</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103288</link>
		<dc:creator>Bandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103288</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That the voters went in a different direction than I’d have preferred is, almost by definition, disappointing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What you should really be disappointed in isn&#039;t the outcome, but the performance of the GOP-eers in the last 4 years. No way, no how did they deserve to win. You can&#039;t count on your opponent to suck every time.And even though the Dems did suck the GOP was even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That the voters went in a different direction than I&rsquo;d have preferred is, almost by definition, disappointing.</p></blockquote>
<p>What you should really be disappointed in isn't the outcome, but the performance of the GOP-eers in the last 4 years. No way, no how did they deserve to win. You can't count on your opponent to suck every time.And even though the Dems did suck the GOP was even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103287</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103287</guid>
		<description>Rummy&#039;s out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rummy's out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103283</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103283</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Fairfax City alone has more people than those other counties put together&lt;/em&gt;

That helps.  But the 6 or so precincts that had already reported in the city totaled only 7,000 votes or so, which didn&#039;t lead me to hope for much from the remaining precinct.  Whereas the counties&#039; totals thus far were in the 20,000s.

Anyway, it&#039;s not like I *want* Allen to win.  I&#039;m just being a self-hating Democrat, I guess ...

--Okay, &lt;a href=&quot;http://sbe.virginiainteractive.org/nov2006/l_02.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fairfax City is 100% in&lt;/a&gt;, with 8,083 votes, 4,538 of those for Webb.  All we are now waiting on is the 2 precincts from &quot;James City County&quot; (so what is it?) and the 1 from Isle o&#039; Wight, which are not likely, as Mark noted, to provide a 7,000-vote surplus for Allen.  How many Virginians are serving in Iraq &amp; Afghanistan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Fairfax City alone has more people than those other counties put together</em></p>
<p>That helps.  But the 6 or so precincts that had already reported in the city totaled only 7,000 votes or so, which didn't lead me to hope for much from the remaining precinct.  Whereas the counties' totals thus far were in the 20,000s.</p>
<p>Anyway, it's not like I *want* Allen to win.  I'm just being a self-hating Democrat, I guess ...</p>
<p>--Okay, <a href="http://sbe.virginiainteractive.org/nov2006/l_02.htm" rel="nofollow">Fairfax City is 100% in</a>, with 8,083 votes, 4,538 of those for Webb.  All we are now waiting on is the 2 precincts from "James City County" (so what is it?) and the 1 from Isle o' Wight, which are not likely, as Mark noted, to provide a 7,000-vote surplus for Allen.  How many Virginians are serving in Iraq &amp; Afghanistan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_lose_house_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-103281</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/11/republicans_lose_house_senate/#comment-103281</guid>
		<description>Fairfax City alone has more people than those other counties put together, and the rest of Fairfax County went for Webb by about 20 percentage points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairfax City alone has more people than those other counties put together, and the rest of Fairfax County went for Webb by about 20 percentage points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
