<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans More Trusted than Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:12:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conservative and Republican Pundits, Thinkers and Operatives Writing Books on How To Save The GOP: Put Down Your Pens! &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059646</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative and Republican Pundits, Thinkers and Operatives Writing Books on How To Save The GOP: Put Down Your Pens! &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059646</guid>
		<description>[...] James Joyner: Now, I’m not going to get too excited about this until we see it replicated over time and across polling instruments.  Sometimes, for a variety of reasons, the results of any given poll can be junk. (It’s more complicated than that but, essentially, the probability that any given poll is completely off the charts is around 5 percent. It has to do with confidence intervals and math that only Nate Silver understands.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Joyner: Now, I&rsquo;m not going to get too excited about this until we see it replicated over time and across polling instruments.  Sometimes, for a variety of reasons, the results of any given poll can be junk. (It&rsquo;s more complicated than that but, essentially, the probability that any given poll is completely off the charts is around 5 percent. It has to do with confidence intervals and math that only Nate Silver understands.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Florack</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059569</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Florack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059569</guid>
		<description>Well, look; the polling however accurate or inaccurate it may be, does seem to be online with the general tenor of elections we&#039;ve seen the last few weeks. Take for example the one out in California. 

I&#039;ve already commented there&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/angry-conservative-base-itching-to-take-off-the-gloves/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;great deal of anger at the left out there&lt;/a&gt;... more than I think most peploe are ready to admit. 

A larger perspective would include the recent elections across Europe, where the left there got handed it&#039;s collectivist ass.

But I don&#039;t think this can be considered a victory for the right, yet. The only factoid to be drawn from these elections and this polling, really, is that people around the world are unified on one point; They don&#039;t want the left running things. 

The exact degree to which this defeat for the left becomes a victory for the right, is hard-connected how much the right seperates itself from the policies espoused by the left. For the American Republican party, that means moving away from trying to be &#039;liberal lite&quot;.

Of course I&#039;ve made &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; point before, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, look; the polling however accurate or inaccurate it may be, does seem to be online with the general tenor of elections we've seen the last few weeks. Take for example the one out in California. </p>
<p>I've already commented there's a <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/angry-conservative-base-itching-to-take-off-the-gloves/" rel="nofollow">great deal of anger at the left out there</a>... more than I think most peploe are ready to admit. </p>
<p>A larger perspective would include the recent elections across Europe, where the left there got handed it's collectivist ass.</p>
<p>But I don't think this can be considered a victory for the right, yet. The only factoid to be drawn from these elections and this polling, really, is that people around the world are unified on one point; They don't want the left running things. </p>
<p>The exact degree to which this defeat for the left becomes a victory for the right, is hard-connected how much the right seperates itself from the policies espoused by the left. For the American Republican party, that means moving away from trying to be 'liberal lite".</p>
<p>Of course I've made <strong><em>that</em></strong> point before, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059460</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059460</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t trust either party when it comes to the economy.  I trust the people of the United States to do what is best for themselves. Unless &quot;None of the above&quot; is allowed the question is bogus.  Set up a false dichotomy and then try to draw conclusions from a false premise?  Please.  All you can conclude from a question like this is analogous to saying I&#039;d rather be burgled than beaten and robbed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't trust either party when it comes to the economy.  I trust the people of the United States to do what is best for themselves. Unless "None of the above" is allowed the question is bogus.  Set up a false dichotomy and then try to draw conclusions from a false premise?  Please.  All you can conclude from a question like this is analogous to saying I'd rather be burgled than beaten and robbed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Florack</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059384</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Florack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059384</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why does anyone trust either party?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because that wasn&#039;t the question. It was, of the two which is trusted more?

Example: I&#039;m questioned which keyboard I like better. Now, that they&#039;re both peices of crap doesn&#039;t alter the fact that of the two, I like the black one with the USB ports on the side, better.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Regarding the poll, it&#039;s fine by me if it gets more Republicans in Congress in 2010.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

After the performance of the Democrats, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any doubt that will happen. 

Tano; You know, not everyone that comes up with results you don&#039;t like is a GOP stooge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why does anyone trust either party?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because that wasn't the question. It was, of the two which is trusted more?</p>
<p>Example: I'm questioned which keyboard I like better. Now, that they're both peices of crap doesn't alter the fact that of the two, I like the black one with the USB ports on the side, better.</p>
<blockquote><p>Regarding the poll, it's fine by me if it gets more Republicans in Congress in 2010.</p></blockquote>
<p>After the performance of the Democrats, I don't think there's any doubt that will happen. </p>
<p>Tano; You know, not everyone that comes up with results you don't like is a GOP stooge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barack Obama&#8217;s Very Bad Monday &#124; The Pink Flamingo</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059181</link>
		<dc:creator>Barack Obama&#8217;s Very Bad Monday &#124; The Pink Flamingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059181</guid>
		<description>[...] (doesn&#8217;t this just keep getting better) Rasmussen has some very good new GOP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (doesn&#8217;t this just keep getting better) Rasmussen has some very good new GOP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Democrats &#187; Republicans Trusted More Than Democrats…..Now</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059143</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Democrats &#187; Republicans Trusted More Than Democrats…..Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059143</guid>
		<description>[...] trust Republicans on 6/10 key issues according a Rassmussen poll. James Joyner says: Now, I’m not going to get too excited about this until we see it replicated over time and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] trust Republicans on 6/10 key issues according a Rassmussen poll. James Joyner says: Now, I&rsquo;m not going to get too excited about this until we see it replicated over time and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Plunk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059128</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Plunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059128</guid>
		<description>Why does anyone trust either party?  Based upon performance they both need some time in the woodshed.  The fact they are politicians first and people&#039;s representatives second means we should never completely trust them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does anyone trust either party?  Based upon performance they both need some time in the woodshed.  The fact they are politicians first and people's representatives second means we should never completely trust them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059067</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059067</guid>
		<description>Nate himself leans liberal, and says so, but I have yet to see bias when he is talking numbers.

Regarding the poll, it&#039;s fine by me if it gets more Republicans in Congress in 2010.  Simplified opinion: I like Obama for various reasons but I could do without Pelosi and Reid rubberstamping all the spending proposals.

Milton Friedman recognized long ago that the best combination appeared to be a Democratic President with a Republican Congress for fiscal policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate himself leans liberal, and says so, but I have yet to see bias when he is talking numbers.</p>
<p>Regarding the poll, it's fine by me if it gets more Republicans in Congress in 2010.  Simplified opinion: I like Obama for various reasons but I could do without Pelosi and Reid rubberstamping all the spending proposals.</p>
<p>Milton Friedman recognized long ago that the best combination appeared to be a Democratic President with a Republican Congress for fiscal policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059042</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059042</guid>
		<description>PD
Whats that supposed to mean?
Nate reported Rasmussen&#039;s performance against the only objective standard available - actual elections. And, as I pointed out, Rasmussen converges on the consensus as elections near and so comes out ok on election day.

How would that make Nate a RW hack????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PD<br />
Whats that supposed to mean?<br />
Nate reported Rasmussen's performance against the only objective standard available - actual elections. And, as I pointed out, Rasmussen converges on the consensus as elections near and so comes out ok on election day.</p>
<p>How would that make Nate a RW hack????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1059005</link>
		<dc:creator>PD Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1059005</guid>
		<description>Does everybody here think that Nate Silver is a right-wing hack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does everybody here think that Nate Silver is a right-wing hack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1058914</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1058914</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s more complicated than that but, essentially, the probability that any given poll is completely off the charts is around 5 percent.&quot;

That assumes an unbiased sample. 
If there are problems with the sampling methodology - and  yeah, this is Rasmussen  - then the probability of being off the charts can rise to 100%.

Rasmussen has become the house organ of the GOP/conservative movement - regularly delivering feel-good numbers that are 5-8 pts to the right of the consensus of reputable polls. They clean up their act on cue whenever an election looms so that when they face their only real test - comparing their numbers against an election, they do ok. But you can look over time and see them converge on the consensus as the election nears.
Pure hacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"It&rsquo;s more complicated than that but, essentially, the probability that any given poll is completely off the charts is around 5 percent."</p>
<p>That assumes an unbiased sample.<br />
If there are problems with the sampling methodology - and  yeah, this is Rasmussen  - then the probability of being off the charts can rise to 100%.</p>
<p>Rasmussen has become the house organ of the GOP/conservative movement - regularly delivering feel-good numbers that are 5-8 pts to the right of the consensus of reputable polls. They clean up their act on cue whenever an election looms so that when they face their only real test - comparing their numbers against an election, they do ok. But you can look over time and see them converge on the consensus as the election nears.<br />
Pure hacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: POLL REPsMORE TRUSTED THAN DEM, THINK PEOPLE WILL GET IT IS A DEM CONGRESS?? &#171; The Mad Jewess</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1058893</link>
		<dc:creator>POLL REPsMORE TRUSTED THAN DEM, THINK PEOPLE WILL GET IT IS A DEM CONGRESS?? &#171; The Mad Jewess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1058893</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/" rel="nofollow">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1058883</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1058883</guid>
		<description>You mean the same Rasmussen that had Obama&#039;s approval at 56% in March, with a brilliant OPed column in the WSJ that he was going to keep falling.  Sorry I&#039;ll pay attention when someone reputable shows similar results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean the same Rasmussen that had Obama's approval at 56% in March, with a brilliant OPed column in the WSJ that he was going to keep falling.  Sorry I'll pay attention when someone reputable shows similar results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1058839</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1058839</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Americans Trust Republicans More Than Democrats.....Now...&lt;/strong&gt;

Americans trust Republicans on 6/10 key issues according a Rassmussen poll. James Joyner says: Now, I&#039;m not going to get too excited about this until we see it replicated over time and across polling instruments. Sometimes, for a variety of......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Americans Trust Republicans More Than Democrats.....Now...</strong></p>
<p>Americans trust Republicans on 6/10 key issues according a Rassmussen poll. James Joyner says: Now, I'm not going to get too excited about this until we see it replicated over time and across polling instruments. Sometimes, for a variety of......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicans Trusted More Than Democrats&#8230;..Now &#171; Blog Entry &#171; Dr. Melissa Clouthier</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/republicans_more_trusted_than_democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-1058831</link>
		<dc:creator>Republicans Trusted More Than Democrats&#8230;..Now &#171; Blog Entry &#171; Dr. Melissa Clouthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=37425#comment-1058831</guid>
		<description>[...] trust Republicans on 6/10 key issues according a Rassmussen poll. James Joyner says: Now, I’m not going to get too excited about this until we see it replicated over time and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] trust Republicans on 6/10 key issues according a Rassmussen poll. James Joyner says: Now, I&rsquo;m not going to get too excited about this until we see it replicated over time and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
