<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dan Rather, Journalist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:09:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ripper</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-24013</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-24013</guid>
		<description>Our fates are not joined,  Curious, you champion lies. You side must lose both for America to prevail and for America to be worth defending. Rather&#039;s methods are evil, if his kind prevail no child growing today will be safe from forged persecution cooked up by the raving Maoist Cleland&#039;s who would betray our liberty and crush our souls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our fates are not joined,  Curious, you champion lies. You side must lose both for America to prevail and for America to be worth defending. Rather's methods are evil, if his kind prevail no child growing today will be safe from forged persecution cooked up by the raving Maoist Cleland's who would betray our liberty and crush our souls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Stranger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-24006</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Stranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-24006</guid>
		<description>The echo chamber walls are thick it appears.  Perhaps impenetrable.  I hope for all of our sakes their not as thick as you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The echo chamber walls are thick it appears.  Perhaps impenetrable.  I hope for all of our sakes their not as thick as you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripper</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-23985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-23985</guid>
		<description>I accuse you, Curious, the forged cover letter contains your signature and orders to your mother to deliver a lap dance and these documents to Mr. Rather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I accuse you, Curious, the forged cover letter contains your signature and orders to your mother to deliver a lap dance and these documents to Mr. Rather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Stranger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-23963</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Stranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-23963</guid>
		<description>I would expect nothing classier.  You represent your positions well.

Bush did not fulfill his guard obligations.  US News has confirmed this using the documents the Bush campaign has released.  He owes time, and according to signed contracts should have been called up to active duty as a result.

You&#039;re on target when you say the forgeries are the mud though.  A nice plant if ever there was one.  Hats off to Mr Rove.  Unfortunately for the Bush campaign it doesn&#039;t change the cold hard facts revealed in their own documents.  Their attempts to resort to Enron-esque accounting tricks to make the books balance should be expected, but not believed.

Don&#039;t be a dupe of the dope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would expect nothing classier.  You represent your positions well.</p>
<p>Bush did not fulfill his guard obligations.  US News has confirmed this using the documents the Bush campaign has released.  He owes time, and according to signed contracts should have been called up to active duty as a result.</p>
<p>You're on target when you say the forgeries are the mud though.  A nice plant if ever there was one.  Hats off to Mr Rove.  Unfortunately for the Bush campaign it doesn't change the cold hard facts revealed in their own documents.  Their attempts to resort to Enron-esque accounting tricks to make the books balance should be expected, but not believed.</p>
<p>Don't be a dupe of the dope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripper</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-23903</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-23903</guid>
		<description>Forgery by Rather is the Mud. There are no charges in the documents, they are imaginary, fake, bogus. They say nothing and are signed by nobody.

Killian&#039;s first draft includes a long description of Curious Stranger&#039;s Mother&#039;s carrer as a prostitute, refute those charges now or speak no more Curious Burkett.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgery by Rather is the Mud. There are no charges in the documents, they are imaginary, fake, bogus. They say nothing and are signed by nobody.</p>
<p>Killian's first draft includes a long description of Curious Stranger's Mother's carrer as a prostitute, refute those charges now or speak no more Curious Burkett.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Stranger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-23859</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Stranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 22:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-23859</guid>
		<description>Funny how your commentary on Sullivan&#039;s article has no mention Sullivan&#039;s observation that the charges are essentially true, as pointed out in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/040920/usnews/20guard.htm&quot;&gt;a recent US News piece&lt;/a&gt; (no friend of Kerry&#039;s):

&quot;The U.S. News analysis also showed that during the final two years of his obligation, Bush did not comply with Air Force regulations that impose a time limit on making up missed drills. What&#039;s more, he apparently never made up five months of drills he missed in 1972, contrary to assertions by the administration. White House officials did not respond to the analysis last week but emphasized that Bush had &quot;served honorably.&quot;

Some experts say they remain mystified as to how Bush obtained an honorable discharge. Lawrence Korb, a former top Defense Department official in the Reagan administration, says the military records clearly show that Bush &quot;had not fulfilled his obligation&quot; and &quot;should have been called to active duty.&quot;&quot;

As Rather has pointed out, whatever comes of the documents, the charges that Bush did not complete his service are true.  The White House has not attempted to deny the charges, just muddy up the water so no one notices things like the US News piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how your commentary on Sullivan's article has no mention Sullivan's observation that the charges are essentially true, as pointed out in <a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/040920/usnews/20guard.htm">a recent US News piece</a> (no friend of Kerry's):</p>
<p>"The U.S. News analysis also showed that during the final two years of his obligation, Bush did not comply with Air Force regulations that impose a time limit on making up missed drills. What's more, he apparently never made up five months of drills he missed in 1972, contrary to assertions by the administration. White House officials did not respond to the analysis last week but emphasized that Bush had "served honorably."</p>
<p>Some experts say they remain mystified as to how Bush obtained an honorable discharge. Lawrence Korb, a former top Defense Department official in the Reagan administration, says the military records clearly show that Bush "had not fulfilled his obligation" and "should have been called to active duty.""</p>
<p>As Rather has pointed out, whatever comes of the documents, the charges that Bush did not complete his service are true.  The White House has not attempted to deny the charges, just muddy up the water so no one notices things like the US News piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-23781</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-23781</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;like a blind rented mule in a hurricane without his boots on&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, that fits really well, come to think of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"like a blind rented mule in a hurricane without his boots on"</i></p>
<p>Actually, that fits really well, come to think of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-23759</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-23759</guid>
		<description>Hugh Hewitt (hughhewitt.com) is trying to get people to call or write congress to have CBS investigated for broadcasting false news stories to try  to influence the national election.  As he points out, congress already had hearings on Howard Stern, why not this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh Hewitt (hughhewitt.com) is trying to get people to call or write congress to have CBS investigated for broadcasting false news stories to try  to influence the national election.  As he points out, congress already had hearings on Howard Stern, why not this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripper</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-23756</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-23756</guid>
		<description>Any fresh Texasisms during the scandal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any fresh Texasisms during the scandal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/retorting_101/comment-page-1/#comment-23747</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7452#comment-23747</guid>
		<description>I tend to doubt he got snookered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to doubt he got snookered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
