<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rodent Excreta Pellets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:12:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mud Blood & Beer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/comment-page-1/#comment-15993</link>
		<dc:creator>Mud Blood & Beer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5956#comment-15993</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you to an extent; I don&#039;t have a problem with the &lt;i&gt;idea&lt;/i&gt; of government inspection of restaurants, but it&#039;s the &lt;i&gt;practice&lt;/i&gt; of inspection that&#039;s of concern.  I&#039;m from Los Angeles, and there what they found was a huge amount of corruption among inspectors, threatening B or C ratings to restaurant owners who did not bribe them.  Inspections also included several standards of compliance that were unrelated to food cleanliness (such as the positioning of &quot;employees must wash their hands&quot; signs; not whether they had them, but the positioning).

Now I know that the government of DC has &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; had issues with government corruption, but it could be a problem if regulations aren&#039;t written and enforced in a reasonable manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm with you to an extent; I don't have a problem with the <i>idea</i> of government inspection of restaurants, but it's the <i>practice</i> of inspection that's of concern.  I'm from Los Angeles, and there what they found was a huge amount of corruption among inspectors, threatening B or C ratings to restaurant owners who did not bribe them.  Inspections also included several standards of compliance that were unrelated to food cleanliness (such as the positioning of "employees must wash their hands" signs; not whether they had them, but the positioning).</p>
<p>Now I know that the government of DC has <i>never</i> had issues with government corruption, but it could be a problem if regulations aren't written and enforced in a reasonable manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Oblivion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/comment-page-1/#comment-15994</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Oblivion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5956#comment-15994</guid>
		<description>Yes, I *do* want to know what&#039;s in my chocolate. 

But then I&#039;ll eat about anything that&#039;s not from an avacado.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I *do* want to know what's in my chocolate. </p>
<p>But then I'll eat about anything that's not from an avacado.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/comment-page-1/#comment-15995</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5956#comment-15995</guid>
		<description>Every once in a while they publish those guidelines in newspapers.  In high school (way back when) we - the geeks - would calculate the bug parts allowed in a Reese&#039;s Peanut Butter cup and post it on the lab room door.  Just to help out the candy sales that the Band was conducting don&#039;t you know.

For some reason it was never a deterent - go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a while they publish those guidelines in newspapers.  In high school (way back when) we - the geeks - would calculate the bug parts allowed in a Reese's Peanut Butter cup and post it on the lab room door.  Just to help out the candy sales that the Band was conducting don't you know.</p>
<p>For some reason it was never a deterent - go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/comment-page-1/#comment-15996</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5956#comment-15996</guid>
		<description>On behalf of my brethren, I must take offense, as it is not our fault that the restaurants failed to give us the necessary facilities or to have marked the areas where it was alright to take a crap while foraging for food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On behalf of my brethren, I must take offense, as it is not our fault that the restaurants failed to give us the necessary facilities or to have marked the areas where it was alright to take a crap while foraging for food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/comment-page-1/#comment-15997</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5956#comment-15997</guid>
		<description>This is not a new problem. Go read George Orwell&#039;s account of filthy Parisian restaurants in &#039;Down and Out in Paris and London&#039;. It&#039;s so awful it&#039;s funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a new problem. Go read George Orwell's account of filthy Parisian restaurants in 'Down and Out in Paris and London'. It's so awful it's funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/comment-page-1/#comment-15998</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5956#comment-15998</guid>
		<description>But this is the kind of thing that we would go mad if we thought about it too hard. I live a privileged life in the American middle class, and I believe that because of that my consumption of insects is at an all-time historical low (much lower than that of the wealthy, or even royalty, in earlier centuries). Not zero, though. Just low. I dig this: it&#039;s a great time/place to be alive.

Here&#039;s one for you: nurses&#039; watches are sterile. That is, they can&#039;t wash them when they wash their hands--but they do have to wear them to take blood-pressure readings. So they are simply declared sterile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this is the kind of thing that we would go mad if we thought about it too hard. I live a privileged life in the American middle class, and I believe that because of that my consumption of insects is at an all-time historical low (much lower than that of the wealthy, or even royalty, in earlier centuries). Not zero, though. Just low. I dig this: it's a great time/place to be alive.</p>
<p>Here's one for you: nurses' watches are sterile. That is, they can't wash them when they wash their hands--but they do have to wear them to take blood-pressure readings. So they are simply declared sterile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/comment-page-1/#comment-15999</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5956#comment-15999</guid>
		<description>Sorry Attila Girl - as a former nurse, I can tell you that watches are not declared sterile. And watches are not used to take blood pressure.  Second hands are used for pulse and respiration counts.  Most nurses wear their watch on their wrist and therefore never have to touch it with their fingers between one patient and the next to take vital signs. 

Nurses wash their hands between patients to prevent the spread of germs, but they don&#039;t sterilize their hands. In the operating room, no one wears jewelry - period. You take it all off when you scrub - clocks on the wall with second hands are provided if needed, but mostly equipment in the operating room takes the place of nurses counting.  And even after scrubbing (10 minutes per arm, up to the elbow) you aren&#039;t considered sterile, just clean. Then you wear sterile gloves and gown. 

Hope that clears things up. *G*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Attila Girl - as a former nurse, I can tell you that watches are not declared sterile. And watches are not used to take blood pressure.  Second hands are used for pulse and respiration counts.  Most nurses wear their watch on their wrist and therefore never have to touch it with their fingers between one patient and the next to take vital signs. </p>
<p>Nurses wash their hands between patients to prevent the spread of germs, but they don't sterilize their hands. In the operating room, no one wears jewelry - period. You take it all off when you scrub - clocks on the wall with second hands are provided if needed, but mostly equipment in the operating room takes the place of nurses counting.  And even after scrubbing (10 minutes per arm, up to the elbow) you aren't considered sterile, just clean. Then you wear sterile gloves and gown. </p>
<p>Hope that clears things up. *G*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/comment-page-1/#comment-16000</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5956#comment-16000</guid>
		<description>Okey-doke. Got that one second hand, from a friend who knew a friend who is a nurse. Should have asked her myself. I guess I like that on a metaphorical level--I always thought it was comparable to those &quot;postulates&quot; we had to use in math. My interpretation of *those* was: &quot;we don&#039;t know if this is true or not, but we cannot proceed unless we act as if they are.

I&#039;m now waiting for a mathematician to come along and correct me  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okey-doke. Got that one second hand, from a friend who knew a friend who is a nurse. Should have asked her myself. I guess I like that on a metaphorical level--I always thought it was comparable to those "postulates" we had to use in math. My interpretation of *those* was: "we don't know if this is true or not, but we cannot proceed unless we act as if they are.</p>
<p>I'm now waiting for a mathematician to come along and correct me  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signifying Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rodent_excreta_pellets/comment-page-1/#comment-16001</link>
		<dc:creator>Signifying Nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5956#comment-16001</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rat crap&lt;/strong&gt;
James Joyner sides with Julian Sanchez against Radley Balko on the merits of government inspections of restaurants. I&#8217;m pretty sure some libertarian&#8212;I want to say it was Charles Murray, in What It Means to Be a Libertarian&#8212;made an arg...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rat crap</strong><br />
James Joyner sides with Julian Sanchez against Radley Balko on the merits of government inspections of restaurants. I&#8217;m pretty sure some libertarian&#8212;I want to say it was Charles Murray, in What It Means to Be a Libertarian&#8212;made an arg...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
