<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul at 38 Percent in Rasmussen Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:53:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rev. C. Walking Turtle Mann (ULC)</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-208575</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. C. Walking Turtle Mann (ULC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-208575</guid>
		<description>@ a comment that was deleted just after I grabbed this text - rare one) &quot;In the latest Rasmussen Reports polling, Clinton gets 47% against Fred Thompson, 48% against Mitt Romney, 48% against Mike Huckabee, 44% against Rudy Giuliani, and 44% against John McCain.&quot;

Very good numerics, as far as they go.  So why is Mr. Kucinich not even mentioned here?  Everybody else is...

@ Christopher Prickett:  &quot;Paul - That&#039;s a simple one. Paul stands for an end to the war in Iraq (as do 70% of americans).&quot;

That 70% is less concerned with the peaceable candidate&#039;s party than in his stand on the grave Constitutional issues that the Bush Administration has flung in our faces for going on seven solid years now.  Smirks, sneers, new ways to harm America appearing via Unitary Plenary Executive Writ every day, and all.


@ Christopher Prickett once more: &quot;Hillary voted for the war and has admitted to keeping the troops in Iraq until 2012 or longer.&quot;

I only do pray that the occasionally brilliant transparency of her publick exterior is not indeed occluded and circumvented (sold out/bought off samesame) by an entirely impenetrable dead-black Inner core and heart.  This has to do with Mister &quot;Depends on What Your Definition of &#039;is&#039; is&quot; Clinton (   ) with respect to the sharp contrast between his public statements having to do with peace on Earth (but for them pesky Kosovars...), talking like to ban all WMD including ours - and his actual deeds (such as being the first ever to employ internationally illegal Depleted Uranium ordnance and all the attendant bio-destruction to ours and Everyone Else&#039;s human genome, civilians and all.)

I think such a deadly vice as the prior Clinton   hypocrisy (also effectively way-prepping and stage-setting for the Bush /fascisti/ in the process, convenient ain&#039;t it?) has yet to be atoned for in this world.  How shall Miz Clinton turn /that/ kerffluffle-making around right?

Not to bore past tears.  I do have many misgivings re Miz Clinton&#039;s actual intent re foreign and domestic policy alike, given the mess of shredded Constitution and all those horrific (to us) but highly cashflow-profitable if exploited (by them) legal precedents (no habeas corpus and a rising, fast-growing corporate-operated prison system (habeas corpus denied by the millions is conceivable and apparently quite meticulously planned-for, among numerous disquieting items) that shall surely stand (amid ongoing highly profitable chaos while the Rest of Us take the meltdown square on the chin) once the customary, business-as-usual pardon-partying is all signed off and wrapped up tight in the Oval Office.

To a pig farmer, his livestock&#039;s very manure pond smells like money.  Some people are really not so very far apart, really, now are they?  But here is the Impossible(FNORD) Excellence of what we have had placed before us.  Let&#039;s just look.

There it is.  Right under our noses.  Amid a din of distractions and showbiz hype contrived to make up for the layer upon layer of alibi and excuse that passes for statesmanship from those oddly-parsed farmers-turned-corporatists, Cheney and Bush.  (POISON.)

Now here is remedy and even antidote.

A Ron Paul/Dennis Kucinich write-in landslide, with the two as running-mates in the next round (second-place gets to be veep):  How shall we have *that* become our Best Available instead of this largely misery-peddling, neighbor-beggaring, Mammon-minded Imperial Pretenders?  Only two *genuine* candidates left to us - but yes, we have one of each color awning - and we stand like sheep as one is shoved straight off the stage and the other is pooh-pooh&#039;d toward marginalization?  Is THAT all the better we can muster toward QUALITY???

No real need to focus so exclusively on the miscreant trust-fund Davos-and-Hellfire-Forever military-industrial-media-crime crowd plus One Lone Republican, imho.  Let&#039;s just play Find-The-Bonesmen now, spot &#039;em all from their perfidious predations upon all humankind, and bring on the Light of Day.  And mind well the Oath...  

Yours in court as well as theirs in the Crypt.  Ah, but Habeas Corpus...  (Now y&#039;see why this loop needs breaking *now*, Friend Bunky?)

Those are all the civil words I have with which to accurately describe my own utter disgust at the manner in which liberty-hating, Constitution-disclaiming, Quisling-acting fluffbunny Democrat Party BushDawgs do fawn at their pretended Master&#039;s feet in all things on Earth.  The stench of the mammon is just overwhelming if one has but even a tiny little Third Nostril at all.  

But &quot;Kucinich/Paul or nothing at all!&quot; is a natural rallying cry, now ain&#039;t it?  Now flash on ol&#039; Popeye the Sailor and his famous, perennial Last-Minute Saves.  &quot;Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich.  Healthy as Popeye and Spinach.&quot;

Good for the *real* (but not the sociopathic) America either way.  PLEASE seek WISE council, Rudy!  (A message to you...)  You too, the contradictions are stacked to the ceiling by now, Good Soldier/Senator McCain.

Increase the Peace.
Reverse the Curse.
Reject ALL terror.
(You know you want to.)

My world too.  Peace.  I&#039;m out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ a comment that was deleted just after I grabbed this text - rare one) "In the latest Rasmussen Reports polling, Clinton gets 47% against Fred Thompson, 48% against Mitt Romney, 48% against Mike Huckabee, 44% against Rudy Giuliani, and 44% against John McCain."</p>
<p>Very good numerics, as far as they go.  So why is Mr. Kucinich not even mentioned here?  Everybody else is...</p>
<p>@ Christopher Prickett:  "Paul - That's a simple one. Paul stands for an end to the war in Iraq (as do 70% of americans)."</p>
<p>That 70% is less concerned with the peaceable candidate's party than in his stand on the grave Constitutional issues that the Bush Administration has flung in our faces for going on seven solid years now.  Smirks, sneers, new ways to harm America appearing via Unitary Plenary Executive Writ every day, and all.</p>
<p>@ Christopher Prickett once more: "Hillary voted for the war and has admitted to keeping the troops in Iraq until 2012 or longer."</p>
<p>I only do pray that the occasionally brilliant transparency of her publick exterior is not indeed occluded and circumvented (sold out/bought off samesame) by an entirely impenetrable dead-black Inner core and heart.  This has to do with Mister "Depends on What Your Definition of 'is' is" Clinton (   ) with respect to the sharp contrast between his public statements having to do with peace on Earth (but for them pesky Kosovars...), talking like to ban all WMD including ours - and his actual deeds (such as being the first ever to employ internationally illegal Depleted Uranium ordnance and all the attendant bio-destruction to ours and Everyone Else's human genome, civilians and all.)</p>
<p>I think such a deadly vice as the prior Clinton   hypocrisy (also effectively way-prepping and stage-setting for the Bush /fascisti/ in the process, convenient ain't it?) has yet to be atoned for in this world.  How shall Miz Clinton turn /that/ kerffluffle-making around right?</p>
<p>Not to bore past tears.  I do have many misgivings re Miz Clinton's actual intent re foreign and domestic policy alike, given the mess of shredded Constitution and all those horrific (to us) but highly cashflow-profitable if exploited (by them) legal precedents (no habeas corpus and a rising, fast-growing corporate-operated prison system (habeas corpus denied by the millions is conceivable and apparently quite meticulously planned-for, among numerous disquieting items) that shall surely stand (amid ongoing highly profitable chaos while the Rest of Us take the meltdown square on the chin) once the customary, business-as-usual pardon-partying is all signed off and wrapped up tight in the Oval Office.</p>
<p>To a pig farmer, his livestock's very manure pond smells like money.  Some people are really not so very far apart, really, now are they?  But here is the Impossible(FNORD) Excellence of what we have had placed before us.  Let's just look.</p>
<p>There it is.  Right under our noses.  Amid a din of distractions and showbiz hype contrived to make up for the layer upon layer of alibi and excuse that passes for statesmanship from those oddly-parsed farmers-turned-corporatists, Cheney and Bush.  (POISON.)</p>
<p>Now here is remedy and even antidote.</p>
<p>A Ron Paul/Dennis Kucinich write-in landslide, with the two as running-mates in the next round (second-place gets to be veep):  How shall we have *that* become our Best Available instead of this largely misery-peddling, neighbor-beggaring, Mammon-minded Imperial Pretenders?  Only two *genuine* candidates left to us - but yes, we have one of each color awning - and we stand like sheep as one is shoved straight off the stage and the other is pooh-pooh'd toward marginalization?  Is THAT all the better we can muster toward QUALITY???</p>
<p>No real need to focus so exclusively on the miscreant trust-fund Davos-and-Hellfire-Forever military-industrial-media-crime crowd plus One Lone Republican, imho.  Let's just play Find-The-Bonesmen now, spot 'em all from their perfidious predations upon all humankind, and bring on the Light of Day.  And mind well the Oath...  </p>
<p>Yours in court as well as theirs in the Crypt.  Ah, but Habeas Corpus...  (Now y'see why this loop needs breaking *now*, Friend Bunky?)</p>
<p>Those are all the civil words I have with which to accurately describe my own utter disgust at the manner in which liberty-hating, Constitution-disclaiming, Quisling-acting fluffbunny Democrat Party BushDawgs do fawn at their pretended Master's feet in all things on Earth.  The stench of the mammon is just overwhelming if one has but even a tiny little Third Nostril at all.  </p>
<p>But "Kucinich/Paul or nothing at all!" is a natural rallying cry, now ain't it?  Now flash on ol' Popeye the Sailor and his famous, perennial Last-Minute Saves.  "Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich.  Healthy as Popeye and Spinach."</p>
<p>Good for the *real* (but not the sociopathic) America either way.  PLEASE seek WISE council, Rudy!  (A message to you...)  You too, the contradictions are stacked to the ceiling by now, Good Soldier/Senator McCain.</p>
<p>Increase the Peace.<br />
Reverse the Curse.<br />
Reject ALL terror.<br />
(You know you want to.)</p>
<p>My world too.  Peace.  I'm out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCCNNN</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-207922</link>
		<dc:creator>CCCNNN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-207922</guid>
		<description>Where area all the Ron Paul freaks spamming the comments???  I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll interpret this article as saying that RP is going to take over the entire western hemisphere with his popularity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where area all the Ron Paul freaks spamming the comments???  I'm sure they'll interpret this article as saying that RP is going to take over the entire western hemisphere with his popularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mnjrupp</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-207862</link>
		<dc:creator>mnjrupp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-207862</guid>
		<description>ma·nipu·la·tion (mə nip′y lā′ən, yəlāən) 

noun

a manipulating or being manipulated; skillful handling or operation, artful management or control, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ma·nipu·la·tion (mə nip′y lā′ən, yəlāən) </p>
<p>noun</p>
<p>a manipulating or being manipulated; skillful handling or operation, artful management or control, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-207794</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-207794</guid>
		<description>I would be interested in seeing the reverse poll. Rudy, Fred or Mitt vs Gravel or Kuchnik. That would test the 1/3 idea of Steven Taylor (that any R or D should get 1/3 of the votes based solely on party loyalty).

I do have to admit that if I was presented with those two names, I would go into the undecided catagory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested in seeing the reverse poll. Rudy, Fred or Mitt vs Gravel or Kuchnik. That would test the 1/3 idea of Steven Taylor (that any R or D should get 1/3 of the votes based solely on party loyalty).</p>
<p>I do have to admit that if I was presented with those two names, I would go into the undecided catagory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Prickett</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-207793</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Prickett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-207793</guid>
		<description>Paul - That&#039;s a simple one. Paul stands for an end to the war in Iraq (as do 70% of americans). Hillary voted for the war and has admitted to keeping the troops in Iraq until 2012 or longer.

Paul is also adamant on our borders being secured, and denying benefits to illegal immigrants (as do 70% of Americans). Clinton voted for both amnesty bills this year (DREAM act last week).

He can argue economics to her silly feel good socialist programs. ($5000 per child when we are bankrupt? Good grief!)

In short - Paul would be a nightmare opponent for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul - That's a simple one. Paul stands for an end to the war in Iraq (as do 70% of americans). Hillary voted for the war and has admitted to keeping the troops in Iraq until 2012 or longer.</p>
<p>Paul is also adamant on our borders being secured, and denying benefits to illegal immigrants (as do 70% of Americans). Clinton voted for both amnesty bills this year (DREAM act last week).</p>
<p>He can argue economics to her silly feel good socialist programs. ($5000 per child when we are bankrupt? Good grief!)</p>
<p>In short - Paul would be a nightmare opponent for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-207670</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-207670</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the percentages would be if Ron Paul had even half the name recognition as Hillary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the percentages would be if Ron Paul had even half the name recognition as Hillary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlog &#8482;: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts &#187; Paul Tops 38% in Poll! (Not as Exciting as is Sounds); Hillary Stuck at 46%-49%</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-207603</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlog &#8482;: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts &#187; Paul Tops 38% in Poll! (Not as Exciting as is Sounds); Hillary Stuck at 46%-49%</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-207603</guid>
		<description>[...] I said at OTB: Actually, that shouldn&#8217;t be a shock. Surely in a head-to-head poll of Hillary v. Any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I said at OTB: Actually, that shouldn&#8217;t be a shock. Surely in a head-to-head poll of Hillary v. Any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swanny</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-207598</link>
		<dc:creator>swanny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-207598</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Comment in violation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://otbmedia.org/policies.html&quot; title=&quot;OTB Site Policies&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;site policies&lt;/a&gt; deleted.&lt;/em&gt;

Those wishing to buy candidate advertising should send inquiries to otb@blogads.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Comment in violation of <a href="http://otbmedia.org/policies.html" title="OTB Site Policies" rel="nofollow">site policies</a> deleted.</em></p>
<p>Those wishing to buy candidate advertising should send inquiries to <a href="mailto:otb@blogads.com">otb@blogads.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-207570</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-207570</guid>
		<description>Actually, that shouldn&#039;t be a shock.  Surely in a head-to-head poll of Hillary v. Any Republican (Ron Paul, John Smith, whomever) the Rep would get somewhere in the high thirties.  Wouldn&#039;t that simply demonstrate the baseline GOP vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, that shouldn't be a shock.  Surely in a head-to-head poll of Hillary v. Any Republican (Ron Paul, John Smith, whomever) the Rep would get somewhere in the high thirties.  Wouldn't that simply demonstrate the baseline GOP vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/comment-page-1/#comment-207534</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/10/ron_paul_at_38_percent_in_rasmussen_poll/#comment-207534</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re evil, James. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're evil, James. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
