<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rush Limbaugh Less Popular Than Jeremiah Wright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:16:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe R.</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-888614</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-888614</guid>
		<description>If being unpopular means that I get to make $50 million per year, then I can&#039;t wait to be unpopular.  Hell, I&#039;ll settle for 2 months worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If being unpopular means that I get to make $50 million per year, then I can't wait to be unpopular.  Hell, I'll settle for 2 months worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-885839</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-885839</guid>
		<description>Even with these Democratic chosen samples, Rush has a higher warm approval rating than the MSM. As for anyone in the media, I would say they all are entertainers. They are there to put on a show and get ratings. Most of the print media falls under that category too.  If it bleeds or is sensational it leads. If the facts are not sensational enough then they find ways to spice it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with these Democratic chosen samples, Rush has a higher warm approval rating than the MSM. As for anyone in the media, I would say they all are entertainers. They are there to put on a show and get ratings. Most of the print media falls under that category too.  If it bleeds or is sensational it leads. If the facts are not sensational enough then they find ways to spice it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-885183</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-885183</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If liberal philosophy can&#039;t stand on its own two feet in the face of a buffoonish radio entertainer&#039;s jibes, then it is a sorry message indeed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;lolol Buffoonish?

He is one of the few people who makes talking anythings worth listing to, he is popular because he tells the truth and has a good time doing it.


  Liberal philosophy can not stand on it&#039;s own two feet without the indoctrinated supporting it as an outright crutch by way of their brainwashed   stupidity and is not the reason for anything but why they hate him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If liberal philosophy can't stand on its own two feet in the face of a buffoonish radio entertainer's jibes, then it is a sorry message indeed.</p></blockquote>
<p>lolol Buffoonish?</p>
<p>He is one of the few people who makes talking anythings worth listing to, he is popular because he tells the truth and has a good time doing it.</p>
<p>  Liberal philosophy can not stand on it's own two feet without the indoctrinated supporting it as an outright crutch by way of their brainwashed   stupidity and is not the reason for anything but why they hate him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-885167</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-885167</guid>
		<description>Mr. d&#039;Inger seems to have it correct.  Rush is an entertainer, and has bragged in the past about his own ability to manipulate listeners&#039; feelings.  Glenn Beck said something similar about a year ago: that most of these on-air type of personalities, including himself, were entertainers first and foremost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. d'Inger seems to have it correct.  Rush is an entertainer, and has bragged in the past about his own ability to manipulate listeners' feelings.  Glenn Beck said something similar about a year ago: that most of these on-air type of personalities, including himself, were entertainers first and foremost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spoker</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-885157</link>
		<dc:creator>Spoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-885157</guid>
		<description>This just really continues to beg the questions: If Rush is really this unpopular, why are BHO and the Congressional Dem&#039;s continually pushing him to the front of the discussion?  And, are they so scared of him they feel the need to try and diminish his stature or are they just using him as red herring to hide behind as the cracks in their own wall seem to grow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just really continues to beg the questions: If Rush is really this unpopular, why are BHO and the Congressional Dem's continually pushing him to the front of the discussion?  And, are they so scared of him they feel the need to try and diminish his stature or are they just using him as red herring to hide behind as the cracks in their own wall seem to grow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-885021</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-885021</guid>
		<description>It is another example of using bogus polling to push an agenda. First off it is a Democratic research firm who doesn’t even give the breakdown of those they poll.  Remember the Dems and Obama have been trying to tear down Rush. The statement of “oversample of 441 likely Republican and Republican-leaning independent voters” means squat. They all could be independent for all we now and doesn’t give of the breakdown of the original 1000 or in what areas those 1000 live.


As for the Rush and Rev Wright comparison, another example of twisting the truth. They took the one number to make Rush look bad.  They didn’t mention that only 2% of the total “unknown makeup” polled have a warm feeling toward Wright while 21 % has a warm felling toward Rush. Also that 47% didn’t know or have any opinion on Wright compare to 21% on Rush. So those having an opinion on the two would result in 73% cold toward Rush and 96% cold toward Wright. Not to mention the scale was from 0 to 100 which means one of them could have many of those unspecified poled rating them at a 1 while rating the other one at 87 on the cold scale.

What a bogus poll. Probably was done in Chicago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is another example of using bogus polling to push an agenda. First off it is a Democratic research firm who doesn&rsquo;t even give the breakdown of those they poll.  Remember the Dems and Obama have been trying to tear down Rush. The statement of “oversample of 441 likely Republican and Republican-leaning independent voters” means squat. They all could be independent for all we now and doesn&rsquo;t give of the breakdown of the original 1000 or in what areas those 1000 live.</p>
<p>As for the Rush and Rev Wright comparison, another example of twisting the truth. They took the one number to make Rush look bad.  They didn&rsquo;t mention that only 2% of the total “unknown makeup” polled have a warm feeling toward Wright while 21 % has a warm felling toward Rush. Also that 47% didn&rsquo;t know or have any opinion on Wright compare to 21% on Rush. So those having an opinion on the two would result in 73% cold toward Rush and 96% cold toward Wright. Not to mention the scale was from 0 to 100 which means one of them could have many of those unspecified poled rating them at a 1 while rating the other one at 87 on the cold scale.</p>
<p>What a bogus poll. Probably was done in Chicago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William d'Inger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-884784</link>
		<dc:creator>William d'Inger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-884784</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So William, 58% of likely voters are liberals? Oh, Noes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Non sequitur -- it is more likely that 58% of likely voters don&#039;t listen to the Rush Limbaugh show and thus haven&#039;t the ability to form an intelligent opinion.

I listen to an hour or so of the Limbaugh show maybe five or six times a year. I do it strictly to be able to have informed thoughts on the subject.

What people don&#039;t seem to grasp is the &lt;em&gt;reason&lt;/em&gt; for Limbaugh&#039;s success. His show is a hit because he&#039;s an &lt;em&gt;entertainer&lt;/em&gt;. He has his shtick, and his delivery is masterful. It&#039;s as simple as that. The subject content of his show is largely irrelevant to his success, and his critics generally display abysmal ignorance of what he does for a living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So William, 58% of likely voters are liberals? Oh, Noes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Non sequitur -- it is more likely that 58% of likely voters don't listen to the Rush Limbaugh show and thus haven't the ability to form an intelligent opinion.</p>
<p>I listen to an hour or so of the Limbaugh show maybe five or six times a year. I do it strictly to be able to have informed thoughts on the subject.</p>
<p>What people don't seem to grasp is the <em>reason</em> for Limbaugh's success. His show is a hit because he's an <em>entertainer</em>. He has his shtick, and his delivery is masterful. It's as simple as that. The subject content of his show is largely irrelevant to his success, and his critics generally display abysmal ignorance of what he does for a living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JKB</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-884782</link>
		<dc:creator>JKB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-884782</guid>
		<description>So it is safe to say that Limbaugh won&#039;t be leaving his million dollar radio host job to run for national office?  

Still everyone knows his name and the budding new President of the United States called him out directly in the first two weeks of his administration.  Cold feelings or not, Rush Limbaugh was brought in from the cold by Obama and is now back in the front lines.  Perhaps calling Rush out was an amateur mistake or maybe it is part of some diabolical Alinsky plan, but it seems like an unnecessary distraction for a foundering administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it is safe to say that Limbaugh won't be leaving his million dollar radio host job to run for national office?  </p>
<p>Still everyone knows his name and the budding new President of the United States called him out directly in the first two weeks of his administration.  Cold feelings or not, Rush Limbaugh was brought in from the cold by Obama and is now back in the front lines.  Perhaps calling Rush out was an amateur mistake or maybe it is part of some diabolical Alinsky plan, but it seems like an unnecessary distraction for a foundering administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-884455</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-884455</guid>
		<description>So William, 58% of likely voters are liberals?  Oh, Noes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So William, 58% of likely voters are liberals?  Oh, Noes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William d'Inger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-884149</link>
		<dc:creator>William d'Inger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-884149</guid>
		<description>Given the level of attention Limbaugh is getting in the media, it is obvious that the Left fears him more than they do the GOP leadership. That shows not only how far the GOP has fallen, but also the weakness of the liberal message. If liberal philosophy can&#039;t stand on its own two feet in the face of a buffoonish radio entertainer&#039;s jibes, then it is a sorry message indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the level of attention Limbaugh is getting in the media, it is obvious that the Left fears him more than they do the GOP leadership. That shows not only how far the GOP has fallen, but also the weakness of the liberal message. If liberal philosophy can't stand on its own two feet in the face of a buffoonish radio entertainer's jibes, then it is a sorry message indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-883412</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-883412</guid>
		<description>I think I made a reference a little while back to Value Networks and the danger of listening to your customers.  It is very much true that Rush is part of the conservative value network, even if you are loathe to call him a leader.

If he is powerful within, while enjoying 58% &quot;cold&quot; feelings without, that&#039;s a confirmation that the value network serving the established base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I made a reference a little while back to Value Networks and the danger of listening to your customers.  It is very much true that Rush is part of the conservative value network, even if you are loathe to call him a leader.</p>
<p>If he is powerful within, while enjoying 58% "cold" feelings without, that's a confirmation that the value network serving the established base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-883404</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-883404</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;nobody’s seriously suggesting making Limbaugh the head of the GOP or its chief tactician&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How about eminence gross?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>nobody&rsquo;s seriously suggesting making Limbaugh the head of the GOP or its chief tactician</p></blockquote>
<p>How about eminence gross?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-883178</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-883178</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;nobody’s seriously suggesting making Limbaugh the head of the GOP or its chief tactician&lt;/i&gt;

No, that would be Joe the Plumber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>nobody&rsquo;s seriously suggesting making Limbaugh the head of the GOP or its chief tactician</i></p>
<p>No, that would be Joe the Plumber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/rush_limbaugh_less_popular_than_jeremiah_wright/comment-page-1/#comment-883174</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=31102#comment-883174</guid>
		<description>Let the free market decide - Rush signed a contract not too long ago for what, a couple of hundred million dollars - yeah, he isn&#039;t popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the free market decide - Rush signed a contract not too long ago for what, a couple of hundred million dollars - yeah, he isn't popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
