<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russia Relations Reboot?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/russia_relations_reboot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/russia_relations_reboot/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:25:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/russia_relations_reboot/comment-page-1/#comment-690120</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=30496#comment-690120</guid>
		<description>Good post, James.

I&#039;m wondering too, if this reminds us all of what it really means when we say &quot;mutual interest&quot;. That is, even though the Russians might be pissed off about the ABM in Eastern Europe, that doesn&#039;t change the fact that they have an interest in seeing Afghanistan avoid becoming a base in Central Asia for Islamists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, James.</p>
<p>I'm wondering too, if this reminds us all of what it really means when we say "mutual interest". That is, even though the Russians might be pissed off about the ABM in Eastern Europe, that doesn't change the fact that they have an interest in seeing Afghanistan avoid becoming a base in Central Asia for Islamists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
