<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russia, Technology, and Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/russia_technology_and_defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/russia_technology_and_defense/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:22:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Instapundit.com - April 29, 2007 - May 05, 2007 Archives</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/russia_technology_and_defense/comment-page-1/#comment-124437</link>
		<dc:creator>Instapundit.com - April 29, 2007 - May 05, 2007 Archives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 02:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/russia_technology_and_defense/#comment-124437</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] UPDATE: An upbeat take from Dave Schuler. posted at 06:41 PM by Glenn Reynolds [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] UPDATE: An upbeat take from Dave Schuler. posted at 06:41 PM by Glenn Reynolds [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMc</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/russia_technology_and_defense/comment-page-1/#comment-123858</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 14:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/russia_technology_and_defense/#comment-123858</guid>
		<description>Dave,

Linked in from Instapundit. First an observation:

In a prior life I worked on software emulation of RadialKeretomety for B&amp;L back before lasers took over. I took several trips over to Russia to review their methods in period prior to the wall falling. In the process I got interested in the techniques they used to build the RK diamond knives the doctors used in the process.

I struck up a relationship with the machinist that was making these instruments. He was well into his 60&#039;s at the time. Had been doing machining since he was 14. He could turn out the most exquisite tooling you could imagine. Polished, smooth operating, to measurements of .001&quot;. All on a lathe he had heavily modified that was originally built in 1896 in the UK! 

We made the same instrument but on what was then a $1m CNC station. The only difference was we made 2000 a week for the machinist&#039;s 10. 

Moral: Watching that man work humbled my then young persona of the supremecy of Western computerized industrilization. It is not necessarily the $$ you put into an effort but the ingenuity that you are able to deliver to the task. 

With nanotech, a person or small group of sufficient acumen that can deliver the first small cell of self assemblers will take an enormous lead. And the russians have proved to my satisfaction their ability to think outside the box. Just consider, they stayed ahead of the US in the space race for a while by pulling off tricks nobody in the West thought of using less technology than we did. 

Consider it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>Linked in from Instapundit. First an observation:</p>
<p>In a prior life I worked on software emulation of RadialKeretomety for B&amp;L back before lasers took over. I took several trips over to Russia to review their methods in period prior to the wall falling. In the process I got interested in the techniques they used to build the RK diamond knives the doctors used in the process.</p>
<p>I struck up a relationship with the machinist that was making these instruments. He was well into his 60's at the time. Had been doing machining since he was 14. He could turn out the most exquisite tooling you could imagine. Polished, smooth operating, to measurements of .001". All on a lathe he had heavily modified that was originally built in 1896 in the UK! </p>
<p>We made the same instrument but on what was then a $1m CNC station. The only difference was we made 2000 a week for the machinist's 10. </p>
<p>Moral: Watching that man work humbled my then young persona of the supremecy of Western computerized industrilization. It is not necessarily the $$ you put into an effort but the ingenuity that you are able to deliver to the task. </p>
<p>With nanotech, a person or small group of sufficient acumen that can deliver the first small cell of self assemblers will take an enormous lead. And the russians have proved to my satisfaction their ability to think outside the box. Just consider, they stayed ahead of the US in the space race for a while by pulling off tricks nobody in the West thought of using less technology than we did. </p>
<p>Consider it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molon labe</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/russia_technology_and_defense/comment-page-1/#comment-123856</link>
		<dc:creator>molon labe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 14:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/russia_technology_and_defense/#comment-123856</guid>
		<description>WHY should that brighten my day?   The public evidence is that Putin is hell bent on restoring a very strong centralized government in Moscow.  His key supporters are all old KGB types.   Why exactly is the fact that they are continuing the old dual-use industrial model (with the military apps the heavyweight side) a good thing.

Or did you leave off the [sarcasm] tag?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHY should that brighten my day?   The public evidence is that Putin is hell bent on restoring a very strong centralized government in Moscow.  His key supporters are all old KGB types.   Why exactly is the fact that they are continuing the old dual-use industrial model (with the military apps the heavyweight side) a good thing.</p>
<p>Or did you leave off the [sarcasm] tag?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
