Comments on: SADDAM WAS DIRECTING INSURGENTS http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/saddam_was_directing_insurgents/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:05:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: The Commissar http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/saddam_was_directing_insurgents/#comment-9519 The Commissar Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=4333#comment-9519 I share your skepticism, but was intrgued at the involvement they are now claiming he had. If his influence and direction were only one-third of what they're now describing, that's still three time MORE than I would have guessed. Oh, yes, attacks and Coalition deaths are down this week. Which tentatively suggests that he WAS closely involved. The next month will tell a lot. I share your skepticism, but was intrgued at the involvement they are now claiming he had. If his influence and direction were only one-third of what they're now describing, that's still three time MORE than I would have guessed.

Oh, yes, attacks and Coalition deaths are down this week. Which tentatively suggests that he WAS closely involved.

The next month will tell a lot.

]]> By: Paul http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/saddam_was_directing_insurgents/#comment-9520 Paul Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=4333#comment-9520 'Sources' are notoriously sketchy. The only empirical data we civilians have is the events since the capture. In that time a WHOLE bunch of bad guys got rounded up quickly. Obviously he was more in the loop than many claim. --- 'Sources' are notoriously sketchy. The only empirical data we civilians have is the events since the capture. In that time a WHOLE bunch of bad guys got rounded up quickly.

Obviously he was more in the loop than many claim.

---

]]>