<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salter Reflects on McCain Defeat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/salter_reflects_on_mccain_defeat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/salter_reflects_on_mccain_defeat/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:32:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/salter_reflects_on_mccain_defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-521398</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27144#comment-521398</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It was a decent speech, but the more fundamental problem for McCain was the lack of any actual message and this was likely due to the fact that McCain had no governance/policy differences from Bush.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, I agree with that. But I think had Thoughtful, Measured McCain (of the concession speech) run instead of Frantic, Messy McCain, he might have have been able to tailor a message of some force and been able to distance himself from Bush, as difficult as that might have been (&quot;I&#039;ve voted with the president 90% of the time,&quot; etc.) But FM McCain foreclosed that possibility pretty effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It was a decent speech, but the more fundamental problem for McCain was the lack of any actual message and this was likely due to the fact that McCain had no governance/policy differences from Bush.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I agree with that. But I think had Thoughtful, Measured McCain (of the concession speech) run instead of Frantic, Messy McCain, he might have have been able to tailor a message of some force and been able to distance himself from Bush, as difficult as that might have been ("I've voted with the president 90% of the time," etc.) But FM McCain foreclosed that possibility pretty effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dantheman</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/salter_reflects_on_mccain_defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-521322</link>
		<dc:creator>Dantheman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27144#comment-521322</guid>
		<description>James,

&quot;We’d have seen a lot less of Cranky, Desperate McCain and more of Funny, Decent McCain and have had a lot less of the “paling around with terrorists” crap.&quot;

Umm, why?  If after the multiple town halls, McCain were still behind, why does anyone (from David Broder, who has been the chief conduit for this meme, on down) believe McCain would have gone through the last month of the campaign gracefully, rather than peddling crap in a desperate attempt to come from behind?  If he would do it after 3 debates, why would it be any different after 10?

He made the best speech of the campaign after he lost, but that seems par for the course.  Kerry and Gore did so as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>"We&rsquo;d have seen a lot less of Cranky, Desperate McCain and more of Funny, Decent McCain and have had a lot less of the “paling around with terrorists” crap."</p>
<p>Umm, why?  If after the multiple town halls, McCain were still behind, why does anyone (from David Broder, who has been the chief conduit for this meme, on down) believe McCain would have gone through the last month of the campaign gracefully, rather than peddling crap in a desperate attempt to come from behind?  If he would do it after 3 debates, why would it be any different after 10?</p>
<p>He made the best speech of the campaign after he lost, but that seems par for the course.  Kerry and Gore did so as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/salter_reflects_on_mccain_defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-521303</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27144#comment-521303</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;if that John McCain had run for president, the outcome might have been different.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It was a decent speech, but the more fundamental problem for McCain was the lack of any actual message and this was likely due to the fact that McCain had no governance/policy differences from Bush.

He could have been as gracious in the campaign as he wanted to, but I doubt that it would have had any significant impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>if that John McCain had run for president, the outcome might have been different.</p></blockquote>
<p>It was a decent speech, but the more fundamental problem for McCain was the lack of any actual message and this was likely due to the fact that McCain had no governance/policy differences from Bush.</p>
<p>He could have been as gracious in the campaign as he wanted to, but I doubt that it would have had any significant impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/salter_reflects_on_mccain_defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-521298</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27144#comment-521298</guid>
		<description>I watched his concession speech, and I thought to myself, if that John McCain had run for president, the outcome might have been different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched his concession speech, and I thought to myself, if that John McCain had run for president, the outcome might have been different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Donegal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/salter_reflects_on_mccain_defeat/comment-page-1/#comment-521293</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Donegal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27144#comment-521293</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s rich that Salter is complaining that the press wouldn&#039;t present to the public what the campaign wanted them to--poor babies. That&#039;s what campaigns are about--you failed. And Obama should have run his campaign in the one way that would have given McCain a chance?  Really, if that&#039;s what Salter really thinks, it&#039;s no wonder they lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's rich that Salter is complaining that the press wouldn't present to the public what the campaign wanted them to--poor babies. That's what campaigns are about--you failed. And Obama should have run his campaign in the one way that would have given McCain a chance?  Really, if that's what Salter really thinks, it's no wonder they lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
