<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin, Earmark Queen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:17:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Brodie</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-512730</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Brodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-512730</guid>
		<description>This whole earmark controversy is ridiculous. There is nothing inconsistent about Palin seeking earmarks for her State, while at the same time opposing them on principle.

While the abusable system is in place, she is perfectly justified in playing the game the way everyone else does, and not placing Alaskans at a disadvantage vis-a-vis every other state when it comes to getting some benefits back from their tax monies that went to fatten the Federal treasury.

She can still advocate reform of the system without being labelled a hypocrite. Governor Palin has her feet on quite solid ground, both practically and morally, when it comes to the issue of earmarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole earmark controversy is ridiculous. There is nothing inconsistent about Palin seeking earmarks for her State, while at the same time opposing them on principle.</p>
<p>While the abusable system is in place, she is perfectly justified in playing the game the way everyone else does, and not placing Alaskans at a disadvantage vis-a-vis every other state when it comes to getting some benefits back from their tax monies that went to fatten the Federal treasury.</p>
<p>She can still advocate reform of the system without being labelled a hypocrite. Governor Palin has her feet on quite solid ground, both practically and morally, when it comes to the issue of earmarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next Great Internet Joke Meme &#124; Heretical Ideas Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511622</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Great Internet Joke Meme &#124; Heretical Ideas Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511622</guid>
		<description>[...] One poops in the yard and the other uses taxpayer money to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One poops in the yard and the other uses taxpayer money to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palin&#8217;s Speech Reax</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511409</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin&#8217;s Speech Reax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511409</guid>
		<description>[...] is, at best, political pandering and, at worst, an outright falsehood.  She supported, as one would reasonably expect an Alaska politician to do, all sorts of earmarks for her state.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is, at best, political pandering and, at worst, an outright falsehood.  She supported, as one would reasonably expect an Alaska politician to do, all sorts of earmarks for her state.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodney dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511156</link>
		<dc:creator>rodney dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511156</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey where the heck is Palin anyway??&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Alaskas a long trip... by dog sled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hey where the heck is Palin anyway??</p></blockquote>
<p>Alaskas a long trip... by dog sled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511136</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511136</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey where the heck is Palin anyway? Why does McCain have her hidden away?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Obviously, she is in an undisclosed bunker somewhere in the continental US with Cheney.  What better place to learn to become the new Dark Lord of the Sith.

There can only be TWO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hey where the heck is Palin anyway? Why does McCain have her hidden away?</p></blockquote>
<p>Obviously, she is in an undisclosed bunker somewhere in the continental US with Cheney.  What better place to learn to become the new Dark Lord of the Sith.</p>
<p>There can only be TWO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511134</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511134</guid>
		<description>Hey where the heck is Palin anyway? Why does McCain have her hidden away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey where the heck is Palin anyway? Why does McCain have her hidden away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511131</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511131</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sitting where I do, it is hard to treat credibly the position of anyone who claims that their side is always right, that their candidates have no flaws, and that the other side&#039;s people are only immoral, inexperienced, corrupt baffoons.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

well you can come down off the fence for you truly have come to know how liberals think to look on others, just make sure you climb down on the right side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sitting where I do, it is hard to treat credibly the position of anyone who claims that their side is always right, that their candidates have no flaws, and that the other side's people are only immoral, inexperienced, corrupt baffoons.</p></blockquote>
<p>well you can come down off the fence for you truly have come to know how liberals think to look on others, just make sure you climb down on the right side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511118</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511118</guid>
		<description>Charles, I&#039;m confused.  Is Obama running as the &quot;anti-earmarks maverick&quot;?  This post is about the hypocrisy of running as such and then choosing a VP who eagerly lapped them up.

And again, the whole &quot;queen&quot; characterization is a play on &quot;welfare queens&quot;.  Given that Obama gives the earmarks, not receives them, it seems kind of odd to ask the challenge you did.  To coin a phrase, it&#039;s apples and oranges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, I'm confused.  Is Obama running as the "anti-earmarks maverick"?  This post is about the hypocrisy of running as such and then choosing a VP who eagerly lapped them up.</p>
<p>And again, the whole "queen" characterization is a play on "welfare queens".  Given that Obama gives the earmarks, not receives them, it seems kind of odd to ask the challenge you did.  To coin a phrase, it's apples and oranges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bains</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511117</link>
		<dc:creator>bains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511117</guid>
		<description>Charles, I dont think Alex&#039;s intent was to compare earmarks (and yes, his title was hyperbolic) but to point out that she sought earmarks, supposedly the bane of federal budgeting according to McCain.  As I explained above, I think it is a moot point based upon what Palin&#039;s position was at the time (Mayor of Wasilla.)  However there is an impression of hypocrisy (false in my mind, but then again, I&#039;m not your average voter.)  Based upon the Palin&#039;s statement linked by sam above, I think McCain/Palin will take the proper tack in explaining the... dare I say... nuanced difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, I dont think Alex's intent was to compare earmarks (and yes, his title was hyperbolic) but to point out that she sought earmarks, supposedly the bane of federal budgeting according to McCain.  As I explained above, I think it is a moot point based upon what Palin's position was at the time (Mayor of Wasilla.)  However there is an impression of hypocrisy (false in my mind, but then again, I'm not your average voter.)  Based upon the Palin's statement linked by sam above, I think McCain/Palin will take the proper tack in explaining the... dare I say... nuanced difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511113</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511113</guid>
		<description>Alex, if $26.9 million in earmarks in Palin’s final four years in office earns her the sobriquet of Earmark Queen, what title would you use for Senator Obama&#039;s earmark total of $91 million in 2007?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, if $26.9 million in earmarks in Palin&rsquo;s final four years in office earns her the sobriquet of Earmark Queen, what title would you use for Senator Obama's earmark total of $91 million in 2007?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511111</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511111</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hmmm. So, I guess leading the pitchfork crowd and continuing with the personal attacks is in the job description.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

lol did you see the liberals getting sprayed outside the convention, they should have gave the cops stun guns.

liberals talking about earmarks as a bad thing and labeling someone else as the pitchfork crowd lol were do you guys get all the crack from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hmmm. So, I guess leading the pitchfork crowd and continuing with the personal attacks is in the job description.</p></blockquote>
<p>lol did you see the liberals getting sprayed outside the convention, they should have gave the cops stun guns.</p>
<p>liberals talking about earmarks as a bad thing and labeling someone else as the pitchfork crowd lol were do you guys get all the crack from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511101</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511101</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Let&#039;s keep the comments to the topics brought up by the post and not to petty squabbling. I don&#039;t want to close comments to this post.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Alex, I think its time to close the comments.  We need to stop this squabbling about Palin for the good of our country and for the good of the troops (whom she has visited, by the way, and has pictures to prove it).  

She is going to be our new Vice President.  She is qualified enough.

The last thing we need are a bunch of neer-do-wells asking questions about her past.  She is with us. She is a new face.  She is a tough cookie.  She is a hockey mom.  She is great and likely the best we can do.

I am proud to call her the next Vice President of the United States of America.

God Bless you Alex, and god bless America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let's keep the comments to the topics brought up by the post and not to petty squabbling. I don't want to close comments to this post.</p></blockquote>
<p>Alex, I think its time to close the comments.  We need to stop this squabbling about Palin for the good of our country and for the good of the troops (whom she has visited, by the way, and has pictures to prove it).  </p>
<p>She is going to be our new Vice President.  She is qualified enough.</p>
<p>The last thing we need are a bunch of neer-do-wells asking questions about her past.  She is with us. She is a new face.  She is a tough cookie.  She is a hockey mom.  She is great and likely the best we can do.</p>
<p>I am proud to call her the next Vice President of the United States of America.</p>
<p>God Bless you Alex, and god bless America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Plunk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511099</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Plunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511099</guid>
		<description>DC &amp; Hal, I understand how earmarks work but does everyone else?

Earmarks are not put into a budget as new spending but instead are priorities given to the budget.  If my state needs a new freeway interchange an earmark can direct the Highway Administration to prioritize that interchange before something like a resurfacing project.  Not all earmarks are stealing or collecting welfare like a welfare queen.

The infamous &quot;Bridge to Nowhere&quot; is a classic example of earmark abuse.  I have yet to see any argument in support of Palin&#039;s earmarks as abusive in nature.  Local officials can and should have a say in prioritizing projects.

So this answers Alex&#039;s question about spin as well.  It&#039;s not earmarks but earmark abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC &amp; Hal, I understand how earmarks work but does everyone else?</p>
<p>Earmarks are not put into a budget as new spending but instead are priorities given to the budget.  If my state needs a new freeway interchange an earmark can direct the Highway Administration to prioritize that interchange before something like a resurfacing project.  Not all earmarks are stealing or collecting welfare like a welfare queen.</p>
<p>The infamous "Bridge to Nowhere" is a classic example of earmark abuse.  I have yet to see any argument in support of Palin's earmarks as abusive in nature.  Local officials can and should have a say in prioritizing projects.</p>
<p>So this answers Alex's question about spin as well.  It's not earmarks but earmark abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fence</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511098</link>
		<dc:creator>Fence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511098</guid>
		<description>As for whether someone is a &quot;troll&quot;  -- for people who want only to talk to people who already agree with them, there are already &lt;em&gt;plenty&lt;/em&gt; of places on the net for that.

Now what would really be cool is is more of the commenters would surprise the rest of us every once in awhile and admit the flaws in the candidates or policies of the parties they generally support, like James does, and even the merits of the other party&#039;s candidates or positions.  There seems to be no shortage of opportunities available on either side, but perhaps that is just my own unique perspective from being on the &quot;Fence.&quot;  Sitting where I do, it is hard to treat credibly the position of anyone who claims that their side is always right, that their candidates have no flaws, and that the other side&#039;s people are only immoral, inexperienced, corrupt baffoons.  Sometimes I wish I could drop a fact pattern on some of you guys, say, did you hear McCain did X, then watch half of you defend it and the other half rip it, then come back and say &quot;Oops, did I say McCain, I meant Obama did that.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for whether someone is a "troll"  -- for people who want only to talk to people who already agree with them, there are already <em>plenty</em> of places on the net for that.</p>
<p>Now what would really be cool is is more of the commenters would surprise the rest of us every once in awhile and admit the flaws in the candidates or policies of the parties they generally support, like James does, and even the merits of the other party's candidates or positions.  There seems to be no shortage of opportunities available on either side, but perhaps that is just my own unique perspective from being on the "Fence."  Sitting where I do, it is hard to treat credibly the position of anyone who claims that their side is always right, that their candidates have no flaws, and that the other side's people are only immoral, inexperienced, corrupt baffoons.  Sometimes I wish I could drop a fact pattern on some of you guys, say, did you hear McCain did X, then watch half of you defend it and the other half rip it, then come back and say "Oops, did I say McCain, I meant Obama did that."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sarah_palin_earmark_queen/comment-page-2/#comment-511095</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=25069#comment-511095</guid>
		<description>This just in from TPM:

&lt;strong&gt;Palin&#039;s Lobbyist Linked To Jack Abramoff&lt;/strong&gt;
As Mayor of Wasilla, Palin oversaw the hiring of lobbyist Steven Silver to help win earmarks. Who is Silver? He appears to have been part of &quot;Team Abramoff,&quot; working on Native American and gambling issues for the now-imprisoned lobbyist&#039;s firm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just in from TPM:</p>
<p><strong>Palin's Lobbyist Linked To Jack Abramoff</strong><br />
As Mayor of Wasilla, Palin oversaw the hiring of lobbyist Steven Silver to help win earmarks. Who is Silver? He appears to have been part of "Team Abramoff," working on Native American and gambling issues for the now-imprisoned lobbyist's firm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
