<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schwarzenegger: Put Aside Ideology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:37:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982749</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982749</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Like I said...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Will Republicans agree with me? Most will not. But then Republicans nominated a woman who took months to articulate what newspapers she reads to be Vice-President, so I will take their disagreement with me as a positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Like I said...</p></blockquote>
<p>Will Republicans agree with me? Most will not. But then Republicans nominated a woman who took months to articulate what newspapers she reads to be Vice-President, so I will take their disagreement with me as a positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982586</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982586</guid>
		<description>South Carolinians won&#039;t be paying back this debt - they, in aggregate, like most of the Republican South, barely pay income taxes at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Carolinians won't be paying back this debt - they, in aggregate, like most of the Republican South, barely pay income taxes at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982497</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982497</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Somehow, I tend to doubt that what you think would be better in terms of a republican candidate does not mesh at all, with what most people think.&lt;/em&gt;

Well, my first choice for President, above Obama, was Chuck Hagel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Like I said...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Somehow, I tend to doubt that what you think would be better in terms of a republican candidate does not mesh at all, with what most people think.</em></p>
<p>Well, my first choice for President, above Obama, was Chuck Hagel.</p></blockquote>
<p>Like I said...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982472</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982472</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;hell if your gonna go with someone because of qualifications like reading and a good mind lol he must be your first choice.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So you don&#039;t consider intelligence and staying informed to be important qualities in a leader?

That explains a lot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>hell if your gonna go with someone because of qualifications like reading and a good mind lol he must be your first choice.</p></blockquote>
<p>So you don't consider intelligence and staying informed to be important qualities in a leader?</p>
<p>That explains a lot...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982425</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982425</guid>
		<description>Be fair. He has a point. We do have cancer. It&#039;s the trillions in debt and unfunded liabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be fair. He has a point. We do have cancer. It's the trillions in debt and unfunded liabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982420</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982420</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, my first choice for President, above Obama, was Chuck Hagel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;lol no Biden? hell if your gonna go with someone because of qualifications like reading and a good mind lol he must be your first choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, my first choice for President, above Obama, was Chuck Hagel.</p></blockquote>
<p>lol no Biden? hell if your gonna go with someone because of qualifications like reading and a good mind lol he must be your first choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982416</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982416</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, regulatory capture by the financial community expands, with Treasury gearing up to pay &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/why-bankruptcy-for-autos-not-banks/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;10X the market cap of Citigroup for a 40% stake in the apparently insolvent firm.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

You want something to tackle, that&#039;s it.  Though unfortunately it is a less partisan problem.  &lt;b&gt;Washington&lt;/b&gt; is in the banks&#039; pocket, not just one party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, regulatory capture by the financial community expands, with Treasury gearing up to pay <a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/02/why-bankruptcy-for-autos-not-banks/" rel="nofollow">"10X the market cap of Citigroup for a 40% stake in the apparently insolvent firm."</a></p>
<p>You want something to tackle, that's it.  Though unfortunately it is a less partisan problem.  <b>Washington</b> is in the banks' pocket, not just one party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982405</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982405</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it kind of late, and childish, to say this?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, I’m sure California would love to have more “free” money courtesy of Uncle Sam.  The problem is, the money isn’t free.  Somebody has to pay for it.  For the most part, it’s not going to be the people getting the money.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Your opponents have an economic grounding.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2009/02/news-flash-economists-agree.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Remember Mankiw&#039;s poll&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Fiscal policy (e.g., tax cut and/or government expenditure increase) has a significant stimulative impact on a less than fully employed economy. (90%)&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is 90% of surveyed economists agree that stimulus is possible.  And then of course it has to be paid for.  Theory goes that this is in better times, by richer versions of ourselves.

That&#039;s what &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-02-22-obamaecon_N.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s counter-cyclical deficit plan&lt;/a&gt; is all about.

Another headline says &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kansascity.com/444/story/1047962.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Economy, Congress could derail Obama&#039;s deficit plan, experts say&quot;&lt;/a&gt;

What are you trying to derail here?  Is success, and a &lt;i&gt;managed cycle of counter cyclical spending&lt;/i&gt; too dangerous to you ... even if it is potentially good for the country?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn't it kind of late, and childish, to say this?</p>
<blockquote><p>Yes, I&rsquo;m sure California would love to have more “free” money courtesy of Uncle Sam.  The problem is, the money isn&rsquo;t free.  Somebody has to pay for it.  For the most part, it&rsquo;s not going to be the people getting the money.</p></blockquote>
<p>Your opponents have an economic grounding.  <a href="http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2009/02/news-flash-economists-agree.html" rel="nofollow">Remember Mankiw's poll</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>"Fiscal policy (e.g., tax cut and/or government expenditure increase) has a significant stimulative impact on a less than fully employed economy. (90%)"</p></blockquote>
<p>That is 90% of surveyed economists agree that stimulus is possible.  And then of course it has to be paid for.  Theory goes that this is in better times, by richer versions of ourselves.</p>
<p>That's what <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-02-22-obamaecon_N.htm" rel="nofollow">Obama's counter-cyclical deficit plan</a> is all about.</p>
<p>Another headline says <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/444/story/1047962.html" rel="nofollow">"Economy, Congress could derail Obama's deficit plan, experts say"</a></p>
<p>What are you trying to derail here?  Is success, and a <i>managed cycle of counter cyclical spending</i> too dangerous to you ... even if it is potentially good for the country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982264</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982264</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Somehow, I tend to doubt that what you think would be better in terms of a republican candidate does not mesh at all, with what most people think.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, my first choice for President, above Obama, was Chuck Hagel.

I can understand why most of the modern GOP so disliked him. After all, he is a highly decorated combat vet who works hard, has a good mind and actually read legislation before he would sign it.

Your hero worship of Palin has made it pretty clear what kind of &quot;leader&quot; you prefer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Somehow, I tend to doubt that what you think would be better in terms of a republican candidate does not mesh at all, with what most people think.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, my first choice for President, above Obama, was Chuck Hagel.</p>
<p>I can understand why most of the modern GOP so disliked him. After all, he is a highly decorated combat vet who works hard, has a good mind and actually read legislation before he would sign it.</p>
<p>Your hero worship of Palin has made it pretty clear what kind of "leader" you prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982246</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982246</guid>
		<description>Somehow, I tend to doubt that what you think would be better in terms of a republican candidate does not mesh at all, with what most people think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I tend to doubt that what you think would be better in terms of a republican candidate does not mesh at all, with what most people think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982220</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982220</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That, if nothing else is the lesson taught by the candidacy of John McCain.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, the lesson was &quot;put a better ticket forward&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That, if nothing else is the lesson taught by the candidacy of John McCain.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, the lesson was "put a better ticket forward".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/schwarzenegger_put_aside_ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-982177</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32007#comment-982177</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But he’s been at the wheel now long enough to know that there isn’t some happy medium where “we both believe in that” on most matters of consequence.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He should, anyway.
That, if nothing else is the lesson taught by the candidacy of John McCain.

As I suggested it would be two years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But he&rsquo;s been at the wheel now long enough to know that there isn&rsquo;t some happy medium where “we both believe in that” on most matters of consequence.</p></blockquote>
<p>He should, anyway.<br />
That, if nothing else is the lesson taught by the candidacy of John McCain.</p>
<p>As I suggested it would be two years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
