Comments on: Scientists: Global Warning Man-Made, Here to Stay

By: Michael

Michael — Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:35:55 +0000

Nite, nite. Go Bears.

Man, you just can't be right about anything, can you?

By: Anderson

Anderson — Mon, 05 Feb 2007 14:40:06 +0000

Nite, nite. Go Bears.

Holocaust denial, anti-Darwinism, sexism ... and the irrational belief that the Bears could win the Super Bowl.

Foolish consistency, indeed.

By: RJN

RJN — Sun, 04 Feb 2007 04:48:51 +0000

Dear Mikey:

Nite, nite. Go Bears.

By: Michael

Michael — Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:37:40 +0000

RJN,
It wasn't so much an appeal for censorship, and a request for relief. You see, I have a condition where exposure to high levels of arrogance, or low levels of intelligence, gives me a nervous twitch. I don't mean to be rude here, but your very existence is causing me minor discomfort. It would probably be enough for you to simply think before talking, or perhaps wearing very thick gloves (thick enough to prevent typing, for instance). I do hope I'm not asking to much, and that you would take into consideration the harm your life causes to those around you and, in my case, even those very far away from you.

Thank you.

By: RJN

RJN — Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:25:48 +0000

Some evidence (?) of not warming through CO2 reflection.

By: RJN

RJN — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 17:50:24 +0000

Time was when the truth carried an argument. Nowadays - for some at least; hint, hint, Anderson - the truth is a "negative capability". I guess I was right about the world going to hell fast.

By: Anderson

Anderson — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:33:30 +0000

Oh, and RJN? Lecturing others on "intellectual health and balance"?

ROTFLMAO.

By: Anderson

Anderson — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:32:44 +0000

See, Michelle, if you weren't a *girl*, you would be able to follow RJN's sophisticated line of thought .... ;) Besides female intelligence, RJN also doesn't believe in Darwinism or the Holocaust, so I wouldn't worry too much. (Tho he has no trouble invoking "natural selection" to support his sexism ... negative capability, I think Keats called that.)

By: floyd

floyd — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 04:50:48 +0000

michelle, wouldn't an impala be better?

By: floyd

floyd — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 04:48:54 +0000

truth is not determined by popular vote, but then neither is government regulation.

By: RJN

RJN — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:19:13 +0000

Michelle: I posed, for you, a very straight forward thought line, and question. I don't need a citation. If you need one, go to google.

Michael: The first thing that comes from you is invective, and the next is a call to Daddy for censorship. Sweet.

By: MICHELLE

MICHELLE — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:00:12 +0000

Onward: The female brains capacity for engineering thought, and work, is not close to the male brain’s capacity. The smallest effort at honest consideration of what natural selection must produce with regard to a female human’s brain is that it must be different from the male brain. After accepting that, how can one still think that a female brain is going to be the match for a male brain in the areas of most need for a male?

CITATION NEEDED!

By: Michael

Michael — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:54:31 +0000

And still nobody has explained the six degrees thing to me. Instead we're claiming that global warming doesn't exist, or that it does exist but it's not our fault, or that it is our fault, but we can't fix it so why bother.

By: Michael

Michael — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:53:15 +0000

Dear James,
I realize that RJN hasn't crossed the rhetorical "line" quite yet, even though he's walking mighty close. I just wanted to request that when he inevitably declares that black people are monkeys, you will immediately ban him and remove all this offensive waste he's deposited on your otherwise decent site.

By: RJN

RJN — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:18:37 +0000

I think Anderson is a decent enough of a fellow, but, I also think he has steeped himself in lefthink, and leftkiss, way too much for intellectual health and balance.

Onward: The female brains capacity for engineering thought, and work, is not close to the male brain's capacity. The smallest effort at honest consideration of what natural selection must produce with regard to a female human's brain is that it must be different from the male brain. After accepting that, how can one still think that a female brain is going to be the match for a male brain in the areas of most need for a male?