<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secret in the Line of Presidential Succession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:32:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/comment-page-1/#comment-101088</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/#comment-101088</guid>
		<description>Matt,

But nobody outside their district/state voted for anyone in Congress.  For that matter, no one would have necessarily voted for a replacement VP under the 25th Amendment.  Gerald Ford, who replaced Spiro Agnew as VP and then Richard Nixon as president, happened to be a member of the House of Representatives but there&#039;s no requirement it be an elected official.

Cabinet officers are at least appointed by an elected president and then confirmed by the Senate. That&#039;s not so bad in an emergency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>But nobody outside their district/state voted for anyone in Congress.  For that matter, no one would have necessarily voted for a replacement VP under the 25th Amendment.  Gerald Ford, who replaced Spiro Agnew as VP and then Richard Nixon as president, happened to be a member of the House of Representatives but there's no requirement it be an elected official.</p>
<p>Cabinet officers are at least appointed by an elected president and then confirmed by the Senate. That's not so bad in an emergency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmatt</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/comment-page-1/#comment-101079</link>
		<dc:creator>madmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/#comment-101079</guid>
		<description>Why do cabinet officials get any place in line?  Nobody voted for them...I would rather see a seniority based choice from the house or senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do cabinet officials get any place in line?  Nobody voted for them...I would rather see a seniority based choice from the house or senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/comment-page-1/#comment-101056</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/#comment-101056</guid>
		<description>I know the folks in the Command Centers (to include NAOC sort of) of US Strategic Command are possibly pulling their hair out right now because they are the ones that track &quot;Continuity of Government&quot; the most closely due to the release of nuclear weapons issues. They have a legal responsibility to track this, while the NMCC is supposedly just a conduit for communications. 

However, if General Cartwright (CINCSTRAT) has not been told this &quot;secret&quot; then the Clerk is violating numerous &quot;Continuity of Government&quot; laws dating back to the 1950s, with significant penalties. I certainly hope this info has been released to STRATCOM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the folks in the Command Centers (to include NAOC sort of) of US Strategic Command are possibly pulling their hair out right now because they are the ones that track "Continuity of Government" the most closely due to the release of nuclear weapons issues. They have a legal responsibility to track this, while the NMCC is supposedly just a conduit for communications. </p>
<p>However, if General Cartwright (CINCSTRAT) has not been told this "secret" then the Clerk is violating numerous "Continuity of Government" laws dating back to the 1950s, with significant penalties. I certainly hope this info has been released to STRATCOM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/comment-page-1/#comment-101025</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/#comment-101025</guid>
		<description>Anderson:

That was my initial thought, too, but the scenario here is that Hastert resigned or otherwise vacated office before the new Congress convened and elected a successor.  At that point, the SPT would be elevated to Speaker.  If a catastrophe happened before a new election, he&#039;d be 2nd in line to the presidency.

It&#039;s incredibly far-fetched but at least mildly interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anderson:</p>
<p>That was my initial thought, too, but the scenario here is that Hastert resigned or otherwise vacated office before the new Congress convened and elected a successor.  At that point, the SPT would be elevated to Speaker.  If a catastrophe happened before a new election, he'd be 2nd in line to the presidency.</p>
<p>It's incredibly far-fetched but at least mildly interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venomous Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/comment-page-1/#comment-101020</link>
		<dc:creator>Venomous Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/#comment-101020</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.c-span.org/questions/weekly29.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;C-Span&#039;s Capitol Questions&lt;/a&gt; says:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A Speaker pro tem is named daily to substitute for the Speaker when needed, and is always a Member of the majority party. For years, the practice in the House has been for the Speaker to only preside over the House in the first few convening moments of each daily session and on ceremonial and politically significant occasions. As the job of Speaker has expanded over the years and his list of duties grown, the role of presiding over House proceedings has been increasingly delegated to others. So, when Members use the terms &quot;Mr. or Madame Speaker&quot; they are most likely addressing the Speaker pro tem, not the Speaker of the House.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.c-span.org/questions/weekly29.asp" rel="nofollow">C-Span's Capitol Questions</a> says:</p>
<blockquote><p>A Speaker pro tem is named daily to substitute for the Speaker when needed, and is always a Member of the majority party. For years, the practice in the House has been for the Speaker to only preside over the House in the first few convening moments of each daily session and on ceremonial and politically significant occasions. As the job of Speaker has expanded over the years and his list of duties grown, the role of presiding over House proceedings has been increasingly delegated to others. So, when Members use the terms "Mr. or Madame Speaker" they are most likely addressing the Speaker pro tem, not the Speaker of the House.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/comment-page-1/#comment-101015</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/10/secret_in_the_line_of_presidential_succession/#comment-101015</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m puzzled.  The statute speaks of no &quot;Speaker Pro Tempore.&quot;  If the Speaker&#039;s office is vacant, etc., it seems the succession would move right on down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm puzzled.  The statute speaks of no "Speaker Pro Tempore."  If the Speaker's office is vacant, etc., it seems the succession would move right on down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
