<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security Breaches (Updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/security_breaches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/security_breaches/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:03:01 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gippergal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/security_breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-521848</link>
		<dc:creator>Gippergal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 05:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27233#comment-521848</guid>
		<description>I had a professor in college who ground into us the importance of recognizing the communist method: three steps forward, two steps back.

This kind of thing is outrageous, and I still get steamed when I think of Bill Clinton giving them &quot;Most Favored Nation&quot; status.

The war on terror is causing U.S. citizens to think that the only threat is from al-Quaeda or the Middle East.

But as long as China remains red, and as long as Putin has his long, probing fingers around the throats of Russia&#039;s neighbors, the U.S. remains threatened by the spectre of communism, as well.

The liberal illuminati can try to ignore it, and sing kum-by-ah with the world, but, in fact, the nation that stocks discount shelves with cheap products does not, in fact, have our best interest at heart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a professor in college who ground into us the importance of recognizing the communist method: three steps forward, two steps back.</p>
<p>This kind of thing is outrageous, and I still get steamed when I think of Bill Clinton giving them "Most Favored Nation" status.</p>
<p>The war on terror is causing U.S. citizens to think that the only threat is from al-Quaeda or the Middle East.</p>
<p>But as long as China remains red, and as long as Putin has his long, probing fingers around the throats of Russia's neighbors, the U.S. remains threatened by the spectre of communism, as well.</p>
<p>The liberal illuminati can try to ignore it, and sing kum-by-ah with the world, but, in fact, the nation that stocks discount shelves with cheap products does not, in fact, have our best interest at heart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Almeida</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/security_breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-521761</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Almeida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27233#comment-521761</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Indeed. Why aren&#039;t we counter-hacking the Chinese government (or are we)?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would be surprised if we weren&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Indeed. Why aren't we counter-hacking the Chinese government (or are we)?</p></blockquote>
<p>I would be surprised if we weren't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/security_breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-521744</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27233#comment-521744</guid>
		<description>For that matter, they really ought to get after people for doing stupid stuff like talking about classified matters on unclassified networks (no AOL accounts!). &quot;Physically separated networks&quot;, people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For that matter, they really ought to get after people for doing stupid stuff like talking about classified matters on unclassified networks (no AOL accounts!). "Physically separated networks", people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/security_breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-521709</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27233#comment-521709</guid>
		<description>Can we finally start encrypting all communication, even if it&#039;s not classified?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we finally start encrypting all communication, even if it's not classified?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/security_breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-521702</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27233#comment-521702</guid>
		<description>Ever play Generals Zero Hour, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever play Generals Zero Hour, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/security_breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-521652</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27233#comment-521652</guid>
		<description>Whose economy has more to lose in a tit for tat cyberwar?  Whose are more tied to online transactions?  China&#039;s?  I think not.  Most of the Chinese use the internet to IM or play games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whose economy has more to lose in a tit for tat cyberwar?  Whose are more tied to online transactions?  China's?  I think not.  Most of the Chinese use the internet to IM or play games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/security_breaches/comment-page-1/#comment-521648</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=27233#comment-521648</guid>
		<description>Indeed. Why aren&#039;t we counter-hacking the Chinese government (or are we)? I would think that in an increasingly networked era, this type of thing would be paramount (and perhaps it is, considering that the FBI showed up pretty quick). 

I think what we could really do to screw with the Chinese would be pranks - like hacking and bringing down the Great Firewall of China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. Why aren't we counter-hacking the Chinese government (or are we)? I would think that in an increasingly networked era, this type of thing would be paramount (and perhaps it is, considering that the FBI showed up pretty quick). </p>
<p>I think what we could really do to screw with the Chinese would be pranks - like hacking and bringing down the Great Firewall of China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
