working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

Shifting Tides?

Poll results in Indonesia show that US sponsored tsunami relief may be having an effect on public opinion.

In the first substantial shift of public opinion in the Muslim world since the beginning of the United States’ global war on terrorism, more people in the world’s largest Muslim country now favor American efforts against terrorism than oppose them.

[...]

  • For the first time ever in a major Muslim nation, more people favor US-led efforts to fight terrorism than oppose them (40% to 36%).  Importantly, those who oppose US efforts against terrorism have declined by half, from 72% in 2003 to just 36% today.
  • For the first time ever in a Muslim nation since 9/ 11, support for Osama Bin Laden has dropped significantly (58% favorable to just 23%).
  • 65% of Indonesians now are more favorable to the United States because of the American response to the tsunami, with the highest percentage among people under 30.
  • Indeed, 71% of the people who express confidence in Bin Laden are now more favorable to the United States because of American aid to tsunami victims.
  • hat tip - Bill Strong

    About the Author: Kate is a freelance commercial and automotive airbrush artist living in Saskatchewan, Canada. She was one of the original guest bloggers at OTB in November 2004 and soon joined the permanent stable, contributing through January 2007. Eventually, she turned to writing full time at her own blog, small dead animals, which was voted the Best Canadian Blog in the 2004 Weblog Awards and has been generally considered that country's best blog ever since.
     
     
    Related Stories:
      • None Found
     
    Recent Stories:
    | Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
     
    Comments
     

    Fantastic news! And as far as I am concerned, this proves my theory that humanitarian aid is more effective and money better spent than warfare.

    Posted by Left of Liberal | March 5, 2005 | 02:11 pm | Permalink
     

    Humanitarian aid has limits. It's useful for dealing with immediate suffering. It can't address the issues of tyranical regimes that you see in countries like NoKo and Iraq under Saddam. For example the US has donated plenty of food to NoKo but because of various issues like diversion of food to the military and control of the distribution of the food that reaches civilians and total control of information and media in the country, humanitarian aid has done little good. Likewise, humanitarian aid did little for Afghanistan under the Taliban. Indonesia is different because it is more or less democratic and the media is far freer.

    Also I'll give you a counterpoint: military aid to the Kurds brought us higher approval from them than humanitarian aid to the Indonesians.

    Posted by zz | March 5, 2005 | 02:38 pm | Permalink
     

    Minds are changed in many ways, there is no such thing as only one way to do things. Different situations call for different measures.

    This is tremendous news and just rides the wave of the efforts that the Bush Administration has done in the recent past. The benefits of this are endless. Also, the fact that Iraqi's were given the right to vote is just as significant.

    Giving people rights and a chance to live are always appreciated no matter what Country one is from.

    Posted by Red | March 5, 2005 | 03:33 pm | Permalink
     

    RSS feed for these comments.

    Comments are Closed

     
    Search OTB
    Lijit Logo
    OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
    For Advertising Info, write
    otb@blogads.com

    ADVERTISERS

    OTB MEDIA

    OTB Gone Hollywood

    OTB Sports

    Allie is Wired

    ATLANTIC COUNCIL

    New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
    Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog



    Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

    All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.