Beltway Traffic Jam

James Joyner | Friday, October 15, 2004

The daily linkfest:

• Rusty Shackleford examines the stats and finds that Bush is hardly the first president to “lose jobs.”
• Julian Sanchez reports an important new right discovered by judges.
• Chris Lawrence argues that judges have always been activists.
• Spoons takes on Sully on the “outing Mary Cheney” issue.
• Jeff Quinton is looking for some Thanksgiving friends in low places.
• Terry Oglesby shares some important fire safety tips.
• Smash explains to John Kerry, again, why there’s not going to be a draft– unless Charlie Rangel gets elected.

To join in, link and send a TrackBack to this post. If your blog doesn’t automatically generate one, use the Send TrackBack feature below. For more information, see this post.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg

• None Found

• OTB Radio – Tonight at 5:30 Eastern
• Journalism as Friend Building
• UPS vs. FedEx Whiteboard Video
• Obama Hurt Deeds in Virginia
• Reading the Bill is a Waste of Time
• Abbas: Palestinian Authority May Disband
• Jodi Rell Not Running
• Caption Contest Winners
• OTB Latenight – Styx
• Berlin Wall Fall: 20 Years Later

Tags | General

| | Permalink | Send TrackBack

• The Unusual Suspects linked with USA Today is Full of It (or at least David R. Francis is)
• PunditGuy linked with National Peoples Republic Radio
• Interested-Participant linked with Al-Qaida Financier Arrested
• The Bemusement Park linked with TBP'S GUIDE TO PICKING A COLLEGE MAJOR
• A Stitch in Haste linked with Draft Hysteria: Rock the Vote -- "How Dare You..."
• Anonymous linked with The Nadering of the Ballot

 

"an important new right discovered by judges."

Since when is the right to publically protest a new thing?

Posted by Mark | October 16, 2004 | 04:58 am | Permalink

 

I wish I could respond to Mark, but for some reason the link in question isn't working for me.

So I'll have to content myself with, "The right to publicly protest isn't a new thing, but the right to publically protest probably is."

Posted by McGehee | October 16, 2004 | 12:33 pm | Permalink

 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed