<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Much For Property Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:18:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-50634</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-50634</guid>
		<description>For those who would like something more actionable, following is a link to an online petition to impeach certain Supreme Court members.. the very ones who have voted in favor of private property condemnations...

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/lp001/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who would like something more actionable, following is a link to an online petition to impeach certain Supreme Court members.. the very ones who have voted in favor of private property condemnations...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.PetitionOnline.com/lp001/" rel="nofollow">http://www.PetitionOnline.com/lp001/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-50505</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 05:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-50505</guid>
		<description>Bush had no part in the surpreme court decision, but don&#039;t expect him to do anything in opposition to it. Bush himself became powerful through the state by seizing private property through eminent domain.

While Bush has claimed to be a strong advocate of property rights, he has proven to be a powerful agent in working against our freedoms, the most important of which includes the right to private ownership of property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush had no part in the surpreme court decision, but don't expect him to do anything in opposition to it. Bush himself became powerful through the state by seizing private property through eminent domain.</p>
<p>While Bush has claimed to be a strong advocate of property rights, he has proven to be a powerful agent in working against our freedoms, the most important of which includes the right to private ownership of property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milton</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-50223</link>
		<dc:creator>Milton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-50223</guid>
		<description>It is a sad day for our nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a sad day for our nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-50035</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-50035</guid>
		<description>This is a horrible decision.  Now, let&#039;s look for a solution.  Call, write, email your state and Federal congressmen and Senators demanding a new law to forbid the use of eminent domain for Private parties.  I personally think ALL eminent domain is wrong, even for &quot;public use&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a horrible decision.  Now, let's look for a solution.  Call, write, email your state and Federal congressmen and Senators demanding a new law to forbid the use of eminent domain for Private parties.  I personally think ALL eminent domain is wrong, even for "public use".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49901</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49901</guid>
		<description>I live in an area where eminent domain will probably take my house.  The supreme court has proven that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in an area where eminent domain will probably take my house.  The supreme court has proven that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICallMasICM</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49876</link>
		<dc:creator>ICallMasICM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49876</guid>
		<description>Sorry but I disagree with the CW on this. I don&#039;t think this increases or decreases the likelihood that your property gets seized it just means that the property doesn&#039;t have to get turned over to some gov&#039;t agency. Say you have a highway reststop and property is taken by ED. Do you think that property should have to be owned by the state and leased to the user or do you think the user should be able to own it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but I disagree with the CW on this. I don't think this increases or decreases the likelihood that your property gets seized it just means that the property doesn't have to get turned over to some gov't agency. Say you have a highway reststop and property is taken by ED. Do you think that property should have to be owned by the state and leased to the user or do you think the user should be able to own it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mover Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49859</link>
		<dc:creator>Mover Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 07:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49859</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt; Kelo v. City of New London, Decision!&lt;/strong&gt;

After writing so much about Kelo v New London here and here and </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Kelo v. City of New London, Decision!</strong></p>
<p>After writing so much about Kelo v New London here and here and</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49855</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 03:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49855</guid>
		<description>Take some advice from the previous owners of this land:  In the end, the only tribes that got treaties were the savage ones that fought hard and took scalps.

If you take this lying down, you&#039;ll wind up extinct, or at least unrecognized, and without a reservation to call your own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take some advice from the previous owners of this land:  In the end, the only tribes that got treaties were the savage ones that fought hard and took scalps.</p>
<p>If you take this lying down, you'll wind up extinct, or at least unrecognized, and without a reservation to call your own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Hanwadikar</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49843</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Hanwadikar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49843</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://ashish.typepad.com/ashishs_niti/2005/06/eminent_domain_.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eminent Domain Abuse&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ashish.typepad.com/ashishs_niti/2005/06/eminent_domain_.html" rel="nofollow">Eminent Domain Abuse</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49841</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49841</guid>
		<description>Anderson,

I hear ya&#039;.  Bush has shown himself to be a big government &quot;conservative&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anderson,</p>
<p>I hear ya'.  Bush has shown himself to be a big government "conservative".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth. Quante-fied.</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49831</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth. Quante-fied.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49831</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Private Takings Authorized by Supreme Court&lt;/strong&gt;

I thought I&#039;d blog about the Supreme Court decision handed down today that I hope even the liberals out there lament (if not spew out a mouthful of soda in disgust like I did). Today the Court ruled that local governments could not only take private ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Private Takings Authorized by Supreme Court</strong></p>
<p>I thought I'd blog about the Supreme Court decision handed down today that I hope even the liberals out there lament (if not spew out a mouthful of soda in disgust like I did). Today the Court ruled that local governments could not only take private ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49827</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49827</guid>
		<description>Well, since the Republicans control Congress, it should be no trouble to get an amendment through forbidding the taking of homes except for actual public use.

[Holds breath; dies.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since the Republicans control Congress, it should be no trouble to get an amendment through forbidding the taking of homes except for actual public use.</p>
<p>[Holds breath; dies.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Wanna Be - Anarchy &#167; Unqualified Offerings</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49826</link>
		<dc:creator>I Wanna Be - Anarchy &#167; Unqualified Offerings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49826</guid>
		<description>[...] a has left the building. Someone please turn out the lights.  Oh, and also, of all people, squishy old Justice O&#8217;Connor:  &#8220;Any property may now be taken for the benefit of anot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a has left the building. Someone please turn out the lights.  Oh, and also, of all people, squishy old Justice O&#8217;Connor:  &#8220;Any property may now be taken for the benefit of anot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morningsun.blog-city.com</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49824</link>
		<dc:creator>morningsun.blog-city.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49824</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Another Freedom Lost&lt;/strong&gt;

Outside the Beltway Is Commenting on it . Google News already has 486 Articles on it . The American Farm Bureau Federation 
  is outraged</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Another Freedom Lost</strong></p>
<p>Outside the Beltway Is Commenting on it . Google News already has 486 Articles on it . The American Farm Bureau Federation<br />
  is outraged</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Verdon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/so_much_for_property_rights/comment-page-1/#comment-49818</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Verdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=11056#comment-49818</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Look, Bush is creating a ownership society. Bush and his billionaire pals own our asses. Is anyone suprised by this?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What a load of crap considering that the majority vote came from the liberal wing of the SCOTUS, and the Bush had little if anything to do with it.

In short, get your head out of your butt anjin-san.  Oh, and your pilot&#039;s license has been revoked for wearing too large ideological blinders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Look, Bush is creating a ownership society. Bush and his billionaire pals own our asses. Is anyone suprised by this?</p></blockquote>
<p>What a load of crap considering that the majority vote came from the liberal wing of the SCOTUS, and the Bush had little if anything to do with it.</p>
<p>In short, get your head out of your butt anjin-san.  Oh, and your pilot's license has been revoked for wearing too large ideological blinders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
