<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SOUTHWESTERN STRATEGY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/southwestern_strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/southwestern_strategy/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:13:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Drum</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/southwestern_strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-8111</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Drum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3891#comment-8111</guid>
		<description>Why the objection to mentioning the Southern Strategy?  It&#039;s just a historical reality, and hardly something you can avoid if you&#039;re talking about why the Dems lost the south.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the objection to mentioning the Southern Strategy?  It's just a historical reality, and hardly something you can avoid if you're talking about why the Dems lost the south.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/southwestern_strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-8112</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3891#comment-8112</guid>
		<description>Kevin, 

I&#039;ve dealt with the &quot;Southern strategy&quot; canard in about a half dozen posts. (See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&amp;search=Southern+strategy&quot;&gt;this search string&lt;/a&gt;.) I don&#039;t disagree that it&#039;s a part of the explanation, but it&#039;s given way too much prominence given the actual history involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, </p>
<p>I've dealt with the "Southern strategy" canard in about a half dozen posts. (See <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&#038;search=Southern+strategy">this search string</a>.) I don't disagree that it's a part of the explanation, but it's given way too much prominence given the actual history involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earthly Passions</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/southwestern_strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-8113</link>
		<dc:creator>Earthly Passions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3891#comment-8113</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Can Dems Win Without South?&lt;/strong&gt;
What are the Democrats&#039; chances in the South in the 2004 election? Not much, according to Thomas Schaller, who writes in this morning&#039;s Washington Post: Solid Republican victories in the Kentucky and Mississippi governors&#039; races, coupled with Howard De...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Can Dems Win Without South?</strong><br />
What are the Democrats' chances in the South in the 2004 election? Not much, according to Thomas Schaller, who writes in this morning's Washington Post: Solid Republican victories in the Kentucky and Mississippi governors' races, coupled with Howard De...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/southwestern_strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-8114</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3891#comment-8114</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Duck Can&#039;t Win South&lt;/strong&gt;
It may be obvious to any serious political watcher, but Duck, M.D.&#039;s followers are too drunk with their &quot;emergent democracy&quot;

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Duck Can't Win South</strong><br />
It may be obvious to any serious political watcher, but Duck, M.D.'s followers are too drunk with their "emergent democracy"</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
