<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SPAM, SPAM, SPAM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/spam_spam_spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/spam_spam_spam/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  3 Dec 2008 21:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/spam_spam_spam/#comment-2997</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2392#comment-2997</guid>
		<description>Spam is free speech, like lead coming out the muzzle of a weapon is free speech. 

(not a serious gun advocate, I just really don't like Spam)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam is free speech, like lead coming out the muzzle of a weapon is free speech. </p>
<p>(not a serious gun advocate, I just really don't like Spam)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy K</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/spam_spam_spam/#comment-2998</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2392#comment-2998</guid>
		<description>Spam is advertising, and thus is commercial speech, not free speech. Advertising has long since been ruled to not be free speech.

If it hadn't been, government laws against cigarette ads on TV, for instance, would be unconstitutional. (I'm not saying I agree with the ruling, just that 'that's how it is'.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam is advertising, and thus is commercial speech, not free speech. Advertising has long since been ruled to not be free speech.</p>
<p>If it hadn't been, government laws against cigarette ads on TV, for instance, would be unconstitutional. (I'm not saying I agree with the ruling, just that 'that's how it is'.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/spam_spam_spam/#comment-2999</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2392#comment-2999</guid>
		<description>FREE speech did you say???

That is an ironic useage of that word. Spam costs companies billions of dollars.

In what other form of "free" speech is the money for distribution stolen from people.  It is theft.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FREE speech did you say???</p>
<p>That is an ironic useage of that word. Spam costs companies billions of dollars.</p>
<p>In what other form of "free" speech is the money for distribution stolen from people.  It is theft.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
