Comments on: Specter Says Senate Could Override Stem Cell Veto http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/specter_says_senate_could_override_stem_cell_veto/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:28:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Don Singleton http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/specter_says_senate_could_override_stem_cell_veto/comment-page-1/#comment-47105 Don Singleton Thu, 26 May 2005 16:59:17 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10700#comment-47105 <strong>Senate Could Override a Veto</strong> That does not mean the President should cave to something he thinks is unethical. Besides you might find that Senators might be willing to vote for something, but not vote to override their President's veto. Senate Could Override a Veto

That does not mean the President should cave to something he thinks is unethical. Besides you might find that Senators might be willing to vote for something, but not vote to override their President's veto.

]]> By: bryan http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/specter_says_senate_could_override_stem_cell_veto/comment-page-1/#comment-47047 bryan Thu, 26 May 2005 12:39:25 +0000 http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/10700#comment-47047 Of course, the political parties concept wasn't envisioned by the framers when they set up the system. But I wonder how much of Specter's sabre-rattling is related to the recent hullabaloo over the filibuster? Of course, the political parties concept wasn't envisioned by the framers when they set up the system. But I wonder how much of Specter's sabre-rattling is related to the recent hullabaloo over the filibuster?

]]>