<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stacking the Courts with Right Wing Nutjobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:28:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dean Landsman / The blog: DeanLand</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/comment-page-1/#comment-83508</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Landsman / The blog: DeanLand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 23:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/#comment-83508</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;To Blog or Not To Blog...&lt;/strong&gt;

To Blog or Not To Blog Can it really be six weeks since the last post?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>To Blog or Not To Blog...</strong></p>
<p>To Blog or Not To Blog Can it really be six weeks since the last post?...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/comment-page-1/#comment-83176</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 20:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/#comment-83176</guid>
		<description>The question is _not_ the judge&#039;s politics. The question is how well the judge can be trusted to keep his/her own views from overriding proper decisions. That&#039;s a major reason (for example) that I (and others) opposed the Meiers nomination - given her career path &amp; past writings, she did not seem likely to be either neutral or independent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is _not_ the judge's politics. The question is how well the judge can be trusted to keep his/her own views from overriding proper decisions. That's a major reason (for example) that I (and others) opposed the Meiers nomination - given her career path &amp; past writings, she did not seem likely to be either neutral or independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/comment-page-1/#comment-83171</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 19:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/#comment-83171</guid>
		<description>Sounding the same old gong, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any intrinsic problem with a common law system but I do think there&#039;s a serious problem with elitism.  It&#039;s elitism, for example, when judicial decisions look contrary to the plain language of the Constitution i.e. non-lawyers wouldn&#039;t understand it because we&#039;re not familiar with the case law and the scholarship.

That kind of elitism looks pretty bipartisan in the legal profession to me at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounding the same old gong, I don't think there's any intrinsic problem with a common law system but I do think there's a serious problem with elitism.  It's elitism, for example, when judicial decisions look contrary to the plain language of the Constitution i.e. non-lawyers wouldn't understand it because we're not familiar with the case law and the scholarship.</p>
<p>That kind of elitism looks pretty bipartisan in the legal profession to me at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/comment-page-1/#comment-83155</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 17:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/05/stacking_the_courts_with_right_wing_nutjobs/#comment-83155</guid>
		<description>What you need to understand, however, is anyone to the right of Castro qualifies as a &#039;right wing nut job&#039; to these morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you need to understand, however, is anyone to the right of Castro qualifies as a 'right wing nut job' to these morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
