<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of the American News Media 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/state_of_the_american_news_media_2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/state_of_the_american_news_media_2005/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:36:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Just Me</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/state_of_the_american_news_media_2005/comment-page-1/#comment-39102</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9626#comment-39102</guid>
		<description>I think the opinion of this group is a bit dubioius.  

I actually agree that they are probably right in regards to foxnews, but then many of their shows are opinion oriented posts, basically editorial pages for TV.  But having various sides covered in the same story, Fox does a much better job of it.

I don&#039;t know how many talking head panels I see on other channels with one token conservative and three or four liberals.  Fox tries to have one to one, or a left/right/middle as much as as possible.

I sort of like the opinion oriented aspect of Fox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the opinion of this group is a bit dubioius.  </p>
<p>I actually agree that they are probably right in regards to foxnews, but then many of their shows are opinion oriented posts, basically editorial pages for TV.  But having various sides covered in the same story, Fox does a much better job of it.</p>
<p>I don't know how many talking head panels I see on other channels with one token conservative and three or four liberals.  Fox tries to have one to one, or a left/right/middle as much as as possible.</p>
<p>I sort of like the opinion oriented aspect of Fox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Lovell</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/state_of_the_american_news_media_2005/comment-page-1/#comment-39081</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Lovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9626#comment-39081</guid>
		<description>This jsut keeps getting better.

First, they threw all their support behind all-positions-all-the-time John Kerry and said they would &quot;be good for at least 15% of the vote&quot;.

To do this they had to pivot on Iraq and sell the idea that Bush had &quot;lied&quot; about WMD&#039;s.  Never mind that these chickens would have to come home to roost and that most reasonable people already knew better.  Who cares?  They are the annointed ones and when the annointed ones of the AMMP speak, we will listen.

Now we find out more and more and they are suffering.

It just keeps getting better...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This jsut keeps getting better.</p>
<p>First, they threw all their support behind all-positions-all-the-time John Kerry and said they would "be good for at least 15% of the vote".</p>
<p>To do this they had to pivot on Iraq and sell the idea that Bush had "lied" about WMD's.  Never mind that these chickens would have to come home to roost and that most reasonable people already knew better.  Who cares?  They are the annointed ones and when the annointed ones of the AMMP speak, we will listen.</p>
<p>Now we find out more and more and they are suffering.</p>
<p>It just keeps getting better...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/state_of_the_american_news_media_2005/comment-page-1/#comment-39067</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9626#comment-39067</guid>
		<description>LJD: I was actually going to put exactly what you said into my post at Dean&#039;s World:

&lt;b&gt;Mainstream Media Journalists Find Mainstream Media Unbiased.&lt;/b&gt;

That would have been a better title for the report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LJD: I was actually going to put exactly what you said into my post at Dean's World:</p>
<p><b>Mainstream Media Journalists Find Mainstream Media Unbiased.</b></p>
<p>That would have been a better title for the report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackLewis.net</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/state_of_the_american_news_media_2005/comment-page-1/#comment-39066</link>
		<dc:creator>JackLewis.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9626#comment-39066</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why would they lie?&lt;/strong&gt;
James Joyner discovers that media polls about media biased surprisingly are &quot;somewhat&quot;? biased....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why would they lie?</strong><br />
James Joyner discovers that media polls about media biased surprisingly are "somewhat"? biased....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/state_of_the_american_news_media_2005/comment-page-1/#comment-39063</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9626#comment-39063</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm.  Journalists who say that network news is not biased.  No conflict of interest though.

Actually, I agree more with Fox News than the Networks.  That shows the problem with this study, since I&#039;m always right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm.  Journalists who say that network news is not biased.  No conflict of interest though.</p>
<p>Actually, I agree more with Fox News than the Networks.  That shows the problem with this study, since I'm always right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlog:  Politics is the Master Science &#187; Shocking</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/state_of_the_american_news_media_2005/comment-page-1/#comment-39075</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlog:  Politics is the Master Science &#187; Shocking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9626#comment-39075</guid>
		<description>[...] ight&#8217;s Boston Legal) you&#8217;d think everyone gets their news from Fox (which, is, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/9626&quot;&gt;of course&lt;/a&gt;, ultra-biased). 	And, as far as bloggers are concerned, there&#8217;s this nugget:  The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ight&#8217;s Boston Legal) you&#8217;d think everyone gets their news from Fox (which, is, <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/9626">of course</a>, ultra-biased). 	And, as far as bloggers are concerned, there&#8217;s this nugget:  The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
