<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sullivan:  Conservatives are Fascists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:17:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127846</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 17:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127846</guid>
		<description>bains,
    Only I didn&#039;t stretch to absurdity anything that was said.  Again, show me where I was uncivil, apologize, or just stop posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bains,<br />
    Only I didn't stretch to absurdity anything that was said.  Again, show me where I was uncivil, apologize, or just stop posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bains</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127670</link>
		<dc:creator>bains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 02:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127670</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ah, so civility on a political opinion forum means not expressing political opinions others might disagree with? &lt;/blockquote&gt;  No, civility means you express your disagreement with... civility.  You dont stretch to absurd something some one else said, and you dont try to mis-represent what they have said.  Greenwald has already tried that... and failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ah, so civility on a political opinion forum means not expressing political opinions others might disagree with? </p></blockquote>
<p>  No, civility means you express your disagreement with... civility.  You dont stretch to absurd something some one else said, and you dont try to mis-represent what they have said.  Greenwald has already tried that... and failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127433</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127433</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Civility begets civility Mike. Sometimes being civil is merely keeping ones opinions to oneself - especially if one is prone to expressing those opinions snidely.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Ah, so civility on a political opinion forum means not expressing political opinions others might disagree with?  Or that sarcasm is somehow below the line of civility on the internet?

You want to tell me my opinions are wrong, fine.  You want to do that though sarcasm, more power to you.  You want to drop petty insults that add no additional information or perspective on a topic and serve only to inflame emotions, that I don&#039;t find civil.

For the record, I was never uncivil to you or anyone else on this thread, and you have yet to provide any evidence otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Civility begets civility Mike. Sometimes being civil is merely keeping ones opinions to oneself - especially if one is prone to expressing those opinions snidely.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, so civility on a political opinion forum means not expressing political opinions others might disagree with?  Or that sarcasm is somehow below the line of civility on the internet?</p>
<p>You want to tell me my opinions are wrong, fine.  You want to do that though sarcasm, more power to you.  You want to drop petty insults that add no additional information or perspective on a topic and serve only to inflame emotions, that I don't find civil.</p>
<p>For the record, I was never uncivil to you or anyone else on this thread, and you have yet to provide any evidence otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127373</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 10:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127373</guid>
		<description>&quot;Democrat&quot; is a perfectly acceptable noun but considered a slur when used as an adjective. One could say &quot;Barack Obama is a lifelong Democrat&quot; but not &quot;Barack Obama wants to be the nominee of the Democrat Party.&quot;

I think this one is another legacy of Newt Gingrich, although it may go back a bit earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Democrat" is a perfectly acceptable noun but considered a slur when used as an adjective. One could say "Barack Obama is a lifelong Democrat" but not "Barack Obama wants to be the nominee of the Democrat Party."</p>
<p>I think this one is another legacy of Newt Gingrich, although it may go back a bit earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127281</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127281</guid>
		<description>bains; 
    Have you noticed that Obama lists his party as the Democrat &quot;party&quot; on his website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bains;<br />
    Have you noticed that Obama lists his party as the Democrat "party" on his website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bains</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127275</link>
		<dc:creator>bains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127275</guid>
		<description>Civility begets civility Mike.  Sometimes being civil is merely keeping ones opinions to oneself - especially if one is prone to expressing those opinions snidely.  You want to take offense at another referring to the Democratic Party as &#039;Democrat&#039; Party, fine, you want to object to comparisons of the Dems to socialists, fine.  But if you do so in a petulant way, dont be surprised when you get called on it.  And whining about doesnt help your &lt;strike&gt;hobby horse&lt;/strike&gt; cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Civility begets civility Mike.  Sometimes being civil is merely keeping ones opinions to oneself - especially if one is prone to expressing those opinions snidely.  You want to take offense at another referring to the Democratic Party as 'Democrat' Party, fine, you want to object to comparisons of the Dems to socialists, fine.  But if you do so in a petulant way, dont be surprised when you get called on it.  And whining about doesnt help your <strike>hobby horse</strike> cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Dish</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127244</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Dish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127244</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] James Joyner responds to my reader email of yesterday. Yes, he&#039;s largely right. But the Bush administration&#039;s doctrine of executive power, its disregard for the rule of law, its politicization of the Justice Department, its indefinite abridgment of habeas corpus, its deployment of torture against detainees, including an American citizen, are cause for serious concern. I think James agrees. I also like to publish emails that push envelopes. The only seriously fascistic element in this administration is torture, the mark of fascist regimes everywhere. But creeping authoritarianism is absolutely a threat. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] James Joyner responds to my reader email of yesterday. Yes, he's largely right. But the Bush administration's doctrine of executive power, its disregard for the rule of law, its politicization of the Justice Department, its indefinite abridgment of habeas corpus, its deployment of torture against detainees, including an American citizen, are cause for serious concern. I think James agrees. I also like to publish emails that push envelopes. The only seriously fascistic element in this administration is torture, the mark of fascist regimes everywhere. But creeping authoritarianism is absolutely a threat. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127120</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127120</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, nothing upthread either, so why don&#039;t you post an actual example, apologize, or just shut the hell up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, nothing upthread either, so why don't you post an actual example, apologize, or just shut the hell up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bains</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127018</link>
		<dc:creator>bains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 03:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127018</guid>
		<description>Upthread pal...  

My mom is well, thanks for asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upthread pal...  </p>
<p>My mom is well, thanks for asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127015</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 02:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127015</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m sorry Mike, I did not realize that you were asking to be treated differently than you treat your political opponents.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Examples, please.  Otherwise, this is no different than how you talk bad about motherhood and apple pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I'm sorry Mike, I did not realize that you were asking to be treated differently than you treat your political opponents.</p></blockquote>
<p>Examples, please.  Otherwise, this is no different than how you talk bad about motherhood and apple pie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bains</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127012</link>
		<dc:creator>bains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 02:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127012</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hey, why not insult us one more time... We&#039;re asking for civility,...&lt;/blockquote&gt;  I&#039;m sorry Mike, I did not realize that you were asking to be treated differently than you treat your political opponents.

I&#039;d hazard a guess that you take objection to the usage of illegal alien as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hey, why not insult us one more time... We're asking for civility,...</p></blockquote>
<p>  I'm sorry Mike, I did not realize that you were asking to be treated differently than you treat your political opponents.</p>
<p>I'd hazard a guess that you take objection to the usage of illegal alien as well...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127010</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 01:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127010</guid>
		<description>absent: That was sarcasm, not concern trolling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>absent: That was sarcasm, not concern trolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: absent observer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127008</link>
		<dc:creator>absent observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 01:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127008</guid>
		<description>Michael: &lt;i&gt;Hey, why not insult us one more time to prove how mature you are.&lt;/i&gt;

My GOSH, Scarlett!  I do say, how your blush must run!  The outrage!

--- and Michael was becoming such a good concern troll! ---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: <i>Hey, why not insult us one more time to prove how mature you are.</i></p>
<p>My GOSH, Scarlett!  I do say, how your blush must run!  The outrage!</p>
<p>--- and Michael was becoming such a good concern troll! ---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127006</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 01:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127006</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;No Mike, I was merely pointing out that petulance abounds. To use &quot;Democrat party&quot; is improper, and juvenile. To decry that usage is equally juvenile. But to claim that the usage is an epithet is childish.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Hey, why not insult us one more time to prove how mature you are.  We&#039;re asking for civility, and while that may be naive on a political forum, it is by no means juvenile or childish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>No Mike, I was merely pointing out that petulance abounds. To use "Democrat party" is improper, and juvenile. To decry that usage is equally juvenile. But to claim that the usage is an epithet is childish.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, why not insult us one more time to prove how mature you are.  We're asking for civility, and while that may be naive on a political forum, it is by no means juvenile or childish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/comment-page-2/#comment-127005</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 01:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/05/sullivan_conservatives_are_fascists/#comment-127005</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It is grandly ironic to here of liberals speak of fascism. Who is it that kills those who it deems unworthy for life&lt;/blockquote&gt;Death penalty&lt;blockquote&gt;, who is it that suppress all but but what they believe in&lt;/blockquote&gt;Gay marraige ammendment&lt;blockquote&gt;, who is it that regulates everyday life because they know better then the rest of us&lt;/blockquote&gt;Terri&#039;s law&lt;blockquote&gt;, who is it that teaches only what they believe in&lt;/blockquote&gt;Intelligent Design&lt;blockquote&gt;,who is it that would take away the freedom of all speech but their own&lt;/blockquote&gt;Free speech zones&lt;blockquote&gt;, who is it that rights laws with nontraditional and unconstitutional methods to enact all of the above&lt;/blockquote&gt;The Republican congress that held power to write laws for the past decade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It is grandly ironic to here of liberals speak of fascism. Who is it that kills those who it deems unworthy for life</p></blockquote>
<p>Death penalty<br />
<blockquote>, who is it that suppress all but but what they believe in</p></blockquote>
<p>Gay marraige ammendment<br />
<blockquote>, who is it that regulates everyday life because they know better then the rest of us</p></blockquote>
<p>Terri's law<br />
<blockquote>, who is it that teaches only what they believe in</p></blockquote>
<p>Intelligent Design<br />
<blockquote>,who is it that would take away the freedom of all speech but their own</p></blockquote>
<p>Free speech zones<br />
<blockquote>, who is it that rights laws with nontraditional and unconstitutional methods to enact all of the above</p></blockquote>
<p>The Republican congress that held power to write laws for the past decade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
