<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SupCt Upholds Lethal Injection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supct_upholds_lethal_injection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supct_upholds_lethal_injection/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:28:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BeldarBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supct_upholds_lethal_injection/comment-page-1/#comment-336286</link>
		<dc:creator>BeldarBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/supct_upholds_lethal_injection/#comment-336286</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Beldar on Baze...&lt;/strong&gt;

Today, in Baze v. Rees, the SCOTUS rejected two capital defendants&#039; challenge to Kentucky&#039;s intended use of the three-drug cocktail for administering its death penalty. The vote was seven to two — only Justices Ginsberg and Souter voted to reverse ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Beldar on Baze...</strong></p>
<p>Today, in Baze v. Rees, the SCOTUS rejected two capital defendants' challenge to Kentucky's intended use of the three-drug cocktail for administering its death penalty. The vote was seven to two — only Justices Ginsberg and Souter voted to reverse ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supct_upholds_lethal_injection/comment-page-1/#comment-336187</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/supct_upholds_lethal_injection/#comment-336187</guid>
		<description>I was posting my UPDATE linking your post even as you were posting that comment.

That&#039;s kinda eerie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was posting my UPDATE linking your post even as you were posting that comment.</p>
<p>That's kinda eerie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beldar</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supct_upholds_lethal_injection/comment-page-1/#comment-336179</link>
		<dc:creator>Beldar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/04/supct_upholds_lethal_injection/#comment-336179</guid>
		<description>Justice Ginsberg, joined by Justice Souter, believe that the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States requires executioners to &lt;i&gt;tickle the eyelashes&lt;/i&gt; of apparently unconscious condemned murderers, and to call their names aloud. 

Seriously.

Either a Pres. Obama or a Pres. Clinton-44 would do their best to appoint clones of Justice Ginsberg to the SCOTUS. 

I agree that it&#039;s very unusual, and significant, that Thomas and Scalia approached the case so differently than Roberts, Alito, and Kennedy did. My own extended take on today&#039;s decision is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beldar.org/beldarblog/2008/04/beldar-on-baze.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this link&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Ginsberg, joined by Justice Souter, believe that the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States requires executioners to <i>tickle the eyelashes</i> of apparently unconscious condemned murderers, and to call their names aloud. </p>
<p>Seriously.</p>
<p>Either a Pres. Obama or a Pres. Clinton-44 would do their best to appoint clones of Justice Ginsberg to the SCOTUS. </p>
<p>I agree that it's very unusual, and significant, that Thomas and Scalia approached the case so differently than Roberts, Alito, and Kennedy did. My own extended take on today's decision is at <a href="http://www.beldar.org/beldarblog/2008/04/beldar-on-baze.html" rel="nofollow">this link</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
