<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Superdelegates Jumping to Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:32:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bornonthefourth</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/comment-page-1/#comment-287021</link>
		<dc:creator>bornonthefourth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/02/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/#comment-287021</guid>
		<description>Did anyone see CSPAN friday morning? The DNC explained the differences between the two campaigns citing BO. has been running a local and HC has run a national campaign. BO. has not won a big state and has taken every caucus while HC has taken all the big states. All eyes on Texas and Ohio. National electability will be proven on this day and the Supers will follow. Good luck to both for thier courage and we hope everyone stays mobile for the fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone see CSPAN friday morning? The DNC explained the differences between the two campaigns citing BO. has been running a local and HC has run a national campaign. BO. has not won a big state and has taken every caucus while HC has taken all the big states. All eyes on Texas and Ohio. National electability will be proven on this day and the Supers will follow. Good luck to both for thier courage and we hope everyone stays mobile for the fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Munk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/comment-page-1/#comment-286874</link>
		<dc:creator>Munk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/02/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/#comment-286874</guid>
		<description>Then why even vote? If the super-delegates are akin to the House of Lords, why bother with going through the charade of popular voting? Have them select the nominee directly, saving us the trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why even vote? If the super-delegates are akin to the House of Lords, why bother with going through the charade of popular voting? Have them select the nominee directly, saving us the trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/comment-page-1/#comment-286766</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/02/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/#comment-286766</guid>
		<description>I think clinton is a sinking ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think clinton is a sinking ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/comment-page-1/#comment-286614</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/02/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/#comment-286614</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Superdelegates Jumping to Obama&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There&#039;s plenty of room to jump into his empty suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Superdelegates Jumping to Obama</p></blockquote>
<p>There's plenty of room to jump into his empty suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/comment-page-1/#comment-286568</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/02/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/#comment-286568</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The irony, though, is that Perez is precisely wrong. The whole point of superdelegates was to give party bigwigs some control over the process in case the regular Joes don’t get it right.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree that was the &#039;main&#039; point of superdelegates, but also I think the super delegates have a responsibility to keep the moral of the troops up.  They didn&#039;t get to be supers by just being an arrogant better than Joe guy, they had to display some democratic party accomplishment/loyalty (accomplishment being a relative term.)  Though there might be something to the better than Joe argument...

I think many delegates are simply concluding that a Hillary vote would do more damage than good to the party.  Not to mention keeping in mind the Obama and Hillary vs. McCain polls.  I&#039;m sure being in the winner camp has nothing do with it, this being politics and all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The irony, though, is that Perez is precisely wrong. The whole point of superdelegates was to give party bigwigs some control over the process in case the regular Joes don&rsquo;t get it right.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree that was the 'main' point of superdelegates, but also I think the super delegates have a responsibility to keep the moral of the troops up.  They didn't get to be supers by just being an arrogant better than Joe guy, they had to display some democratic party accomplishment/loyalty (accomplishment being a relative term.)  Though there might be something to the better than Joe argument...</p>
<p>I think many delegates are simply concluding that a Hillary vote would do more damage than good to the party.  Not to mention keeping in mind the Obama and Hillary vs. McCain polls.  I'm sure being in the winner camp has nothing do with it, this being politics and all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/comment-page-1/#comment-286563</link>
		<dc:creator>Edd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/02/superdelegates_jumping_to_obama/#comment-286563</guid>
		<description>Expect to see the floodgates open now that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dirtyelection.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-turns-back-on-hillary-clinton/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NY times formally stabbed Hillary in the back&lt;/a&gt;! Superdelegates will be jumping ship like rats in a port!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect to see the floodgates open now that the <a href="http://dirtyelection.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-turns-back-on-hillary-clinton/" rel="nofollow">NY times formally stabbed Hillary in the back</a>! Superdelegates will be jumping ship like rats in a port!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
