<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Reinstates N.H. Abortion Law&#8211;for Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_affirms_nh_abortion_law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_affirms_nh_abortion_law/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:50:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_affirms_nh_abortion_law/comment-page-1/#comment-71143</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13322#comment-71143</guid>
		<description>&quot;bypass&quot; is better read &quot;this law is a farce&quot;if the parents are so dangerous that their involvement would not be in the &quot;girl&#039;s best interests&quot;[sic]then the &quot;DCFS&quot; should certainly never let them regain custody afterward. that clause simply means that children are wards of the state from birth.for those of you who want more state interference in families, remember this irrefutable fact; it is impossible for any government to care about anyone for even a moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"bypass" is better read "this law is a farce"if the parents are so dangerous that their involvement would not be in the "girl's best interests"[sic]then the "DCFS" should certainly never let them regain custody afterward. that clause simply means that children are wards of the state from birth.for those of you who want more state interference in families, remember this irrefutable fact; it is impossible for any government to care about anyone for even a moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_affirms_nh_abortion_law/comment-page-1/#comment-71119</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13322#comment-71119</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top court dodges abortion ruling&lt;/strong&gt;

In a unanimous vote Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a lower court was wrong to str</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top court dodges abortion ruling</strong></p>
<p>In a unanimous vote Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a lower court was wrong to str</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/supreme_court_affirms_nh_abortion_law/comment-page-1/#comment-71115</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13322#comment-71115</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Read most broadly, though, the opinion could be understood as laying down a new limit on lower court judges&#039; authority to issue sweeping decisions that nullify new abortion laws, end to end.&lt;/em&gt;

Wow, and they ruled 9-0, huh? That evil Bush! He&#039;s infected the liberal wing of the court with his anti-abortion, strict constructionist mumbo jumbo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Read most broadly, though, the opinion could be understood as laying down a new limit on lower court judges' authority to issue sweeping decisions that nullify new abortion laws, end to end.</em></p>
<p>Wow, and they ruled 9-0, huh? That evil Bush! He's infected the liberal wing of the court with his anti-abortion, strict constructionist mumbo jumbo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
